The purpose of this review is to expand understanding of the ways culturally, ethnically, and racially diverse youth have begun to reimagine urban and rural spaces using digital storytelling and photovoice, two methods that often fall under the broad field of youth participatory action research. To explain the conditions under which these methods favor movement toward socially just ideas and actions, we also build on and extend research in critical youth empowerment to call attention to the relational nature of the kind of work that positions youth as coresearchers and democratically engaged citizens. Of importance are the availability of safe, nurturing spaces that foster youth engagement, the quality of relationships between youth and adults, and the extent to which decisions and actions remain in the hands of youth. Finally, this review considers the implications for further research and what it could mean to reimagine schools and communities as spaces where youth have a voice as civically engaged citizens.
AkomA.GinwrightS.CammarotaJ. (2008). Youthtopias: Towards a new paradigm of critical youth studies. Youth Media Reporter: The Profession Journal of the Youth Media Field, 2(4), 1–30.
AndreouthE.SkovdalM.CampbellC. (2013). “It made me realize that I am lucky for what I got.” British young carers encountering the realities of their African peers. Journal of Youth Studies, 16, 1038–1053.
4.
BakerB.LuhmT.JohnsonM.SciarraD. (2017). Is school funding fair? A national report card. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
5.
BangM.FaberL.GurneauJ.MarinA.SotoC. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41.
6.
BangM.VossoughiS. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making, cognition and instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 34, 173–193.
7.
*BeucherR. (2016). Speaking through digital storytelling: A case study of agency and the politics of identity formation in school. In GreeneS.BurkeK.McKennaM. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp. 50–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BishopE. (2015). Becoming activist: Critical literacy and youth organizing. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
9.
BlundellD. (2016). Rethinking children’s spaces and places. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
10.
BowmanN. (2011). Promoting participation in a diverse democracy: A meta-analysis of college diversity experiences and civic engagement. Review of Educational Research, 81, 29–68.
11.
*Brann-BarrettM. (2011). Same landscape, different lens: Variations in young people’s socio-economic experiences and perceptions in their disadvantaged working-class community. Journal of Youth Studies, 14, 261–278.
12.
BrayboyB. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. Urban Review, 37, 425–446.
13.
*BurkeK. J.GreeneS. (2015). Participatory action research, youth voices, and civic engagement. Language Arts, 92, 389–402.
14.
*BurkeK. J.GreeneS.McKennaM. K. (2016). A critical geographic approach to youth civic engagement: Reframing educational opportunity zones and the use of public spaces. Urban Education, 51, 143–169.
15.
*BurkeK. J.GreeneS.McKennaM. K. (2017). Youth voice, civic engagement and failure in participatory action research. Urban Review, 49, 585–601. doi:10.1007/s11256-017-0410-4
16.
CammarotaJ.FineM. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In CammarotaJ.FineM. (Eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
CaraballoL.LozenskiB.LyiscottJ.MorrellE. (2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies: Rethinking educational research. Review of Research in Education, XX, 1–26.
18.
*CargoM.GramsG. D.OttosonJ. M.WardP.GreenL. W. (2003). Empowerment as fostering positive youth development and citizenship. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Suppl. 1), S66–S79.
19.
CarterP. L.ReardonS. F. (2014). Inequality matters. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
20.
CataliniC.MinklerM. (2000). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior, 37, 424–451.
21.
ChambersT.GopaulB. (2010). Toward a social justice-centered engaged scholarship: A public and private good. In FitzgeraldH.BurackC.SeiferS. (Eds.), Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions (pp. 55–70). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
22.
*CharmaramanL. (2013). Congregating to create for social change: Urban youth media production and sense of community. Learning, Meaning and Technology, 38, 102–115.
23.
*ChonodyJ.FermanB.Amitrani-WelshJ.MartinT. (2013). Violence through the eyes of youth: A photovoice exploration. Community Psychology, 41, 84–101.
24.
*CookK. (2015). Grappling with wicked problems: Exploring photovoice as a decolonizing methodology. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 581–592.
25.
Cook-SatherA. (2009). Learning from the student’s perspective: A methods sourcebook for effective teaching. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
26.
CresswellT. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
27.
*DavisD. (2011). Intergenerational digital storytelling: A sustainable community initiative with inner-city residents. Visual Communication, 10, 527–540.
28.
*DeGenerroD. (2008). The dialectics informing identity in an urban youth digital storytelling workshop. E-Learning, 5, 429–444. doi:10.2304/elea.2008.5.4.429
29.
*DelgadoM. (2015). Urban youth and photovoice: Visual ethnography in action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
DelgadoM.StaplesL. (2007). Youth-led organizing, community engagement, and opportunity creation. In WeirM.ReischM.OhmerM. L. (Eds.), The handbook of community practice (2nd ed., pp. 547–565). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
*DennerJ.MartinezJ. (2015). Children and youth making digital media for the social good. In GuzzettiB.LesleyM. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the societal impact of digital media (pp. 398–416). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
32.
*DerrV.ChawlaL.MintzerM.CushingD.Van VlietW. (2013). A city for all citizens: Integrating children and youth from marginalized populations into city planning. Buildings, 3, 482–505.
33.
*Duncan-AndradeJ. (2006). Urban youth, media literacy, and increased critical civic participation. In GinwrightS.NogueraP.CammarotaJ. (Eds.), Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change (pp. 149–169). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Duncan-AndradeJ.MorrellE. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
35.
EllsworthE. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 297–325.
36.
*EwaldW.HydeK.LordL. (2011). Literacy and justice through photography: A classroom guide. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
FernandezJ. S.LanghoutR. D. (2014). “A community with diversity of culture, wealth, resources, and living experiences”: Defining neighborhood in an unincorporated community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 122–133.
38.
*FilipiakD.MillerI. (2014). Me and the D: (Re)imagining literacy and Detroit’s future. English Journal, High School Edition, 103(5), 59–66.
39.
FineM.TorreM.BurnsA.PayneY. (2007). Youth research/participatory methods for reform. In ThiessenD.Cook-SatherA. (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 805–828). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
40.
*FletcherS.MullettJ. (2016). Digital stories as a tool for health promotion and youth engagement. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 107, 183–187.
41.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
42.
*GarciaA. (Ed.). (2014). Teaching in the connected learning classroom. Berkeley, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub and the National Writing Project.
43.
*GarciaA.MinklerM.CardenasZ.GrillC.PorterC. (2015). Engaging homeless youth in community-based participatory research: A case study from Skid Row, Los Angeles. Health Promotion Practice, 5, 18–27.
44.
*GibbonsD.DriftT.DriftD. (2010). Whose story is it? Being Native and American: Crossing borders, hyphenated selves. In FisherkellerJ. (Ed.), International perspectives on youth media: Cultures of production and education (pp. 172–191). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
45.
*GinwrightS. (2010). Black youth rising: Activism and radical healing in urban America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46.
GinwrightS.CammarotaJ. (2007). Youth activism in the urban community: Learning critical civic praxis within community organizations. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 693–710.
47.
*GoldmanS.BookerA.McDermottM. (2008). Mixing the digital, social, and cultural: Learning, identity, and agency in youth participation. In BuckinghamD (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 185–206). Cambridge: MIT Press and The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning.
48.
*GoodmanS. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production, & social change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
49.
*GoodmanS.CoccaC. (2013). Youth voices for change: Building political efficacy and civic engagement through digital media literacy. Journal of Digital and Media Literacy, 1(1). Retrieved from www.jodml.org/2013/02/01/youth-voices-for-change/
50.
*GrahamL.ReyesA.LopezW.GraceyA.SnowR.PadillaM. (2013). Addressing economic devastation and built environment degradation to prevent violence: A photovoice project of Detroit Youth Passages. Community Literacy Journal, 8(1), 41–52.
51.
GreeneS. (2013). Race, community, and urban schools: Partnering with African American families. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
52.
*GreeneS.BurkeK.McKennaM. K. (2014). Reframing spatial inequality: Youth, photography and a changing urban landscape. In HallH. R.RobinsonC. C.KohliA. (Eds.), Uprooting urban America: Multidisciplinary perspectives on race, class & gentrification (pp. 107–130). New York: Peter Lang.
53.
*GreeneS.BurkeK. J.McKennaM. K. (2016). “When words fail, art speaks”: Learning to listen to youth stories in a community photovoice project. In GreeneS.BurkeK. J.McKennaM. K. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp. 235–258). New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
*GrieblingS.VaughnL.HowellB.RamstetterC.DoleD. (2013). From passive to active voice: Using photography as a catalyst for social action. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(2), 16–28.
55.
*GuajardoF. (2013, April-May). Digital storytelling and the Llano Grande Center. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
56.
*GuajardoF.GuajardoM.CantuM. (2016). Where are they now? An intergenerational conversation on the work of the Llano Grande Center for Research and Development. In GreeneS.BurkeK.McKennaM. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp. 169–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
GutiérrezK. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.
58.
*HackettM.Gillens-EromoseleC.DixonJ. (2015). Examining childhood obesity and the environment of a segregated, lower-income US suburb. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 8, 247–259.
59.
*HalsallT.FornerisT. (2016). Behind the scenes of youth-led community events: A participatory evaluation approach using photovoice in a Canadian First Nation Community. Youth Engagement in Health Promotion, 1(2), 1–14.
60.
*HawK. (2008). “Voice” and video: Seen, heard, and listened to? In ThomsonP. (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 193–208). New York, NY: Routledge.
61.
*HergenratherK.RhodesS.CowanC.BardhoshiG. (2009). Photovoice as community-based participatory research: A qualitative review. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33, 686–698.
62.
*HillM.VasudevanL. (Eds.). (2007). Media, learning, and sites of possibility. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
63.
*HughesJ. (2009). New media, new literacies and the adolescent learner. E-Learning, 6, 259–271.
64.
*HullG. (2003). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 229–333.
65.
*HullG.James. (2006). Geographies of hope: A study of urban landscapes, digital media, and children’s representations of place. In O’NeillP. (Ed.), Blurring boundaries: Research and teaching beyond a discipline (pp. 72–93). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
66.
*HullG.KatzM. (2006). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.
67.
*HullG.NelsonM. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22, 224–261.
68.
JamesA. (2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist, 109, 261–272.
69.
JenningsL.GreenJ. (1999). Locating democratizing and transformative practices within classroom discourse. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 34, i-iv.
70.
JenningsL.Parra-MedinaD.MessiasD.McLoughlinK. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 31–55.
71.
JocsonK. (2013). Cultural transformations: Youth and pedagogies of possibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
*JohnsonK. (2008). Teaching visual research methods. In ThomsonP. (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 77–94). New York, NY: Routledge.
73.
Johnston-GoodstarK. (2013). Indigenous youth participatory action research: Re-visioning social justice for social work with Indigenous youths. Social Work, 58, 314–320.
74.
Johnston-GoodstarK.SethiJ. (2013). Youth media as social justice youth development. Journal of American Indian Education, 52, 65–80.
75.
KaplanE. (2013). We live in the shadow: Inner-city kids tell their stories through photographs. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
76.
*KaplanI. (2008). Being “seen” being “heard.” In ThomsonP. (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 175–191). New York, NY: Routledge.
77.
*KimS.CrutchfieldC.WilliamsC.HeplerN. (1998). Toward a new paradigm in substance abuse and other problem behavior prevention for youth: Youth development and empowerment approach. Journal of Drug Education, 28, 1–17.
78.
*KinlochV. (2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
81.
LatzA. (2017). Photovoice research in education and beyond: A practical guide from theory to exhibition. New York, NY: Routledge.
82.
*LeeC.SoepE. (2016). None but ourselves can free our minds: Critical computational literacy as a pedagogy of resistance. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49, 480–492.
83.
LeitchR. (2008). Children’s narratives through images. In ThomsonP. (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 37–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
84.
LevinsonM. (2012). No citizen left behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
*LopezE.EngE.RobinsonN.WangC. C. (2005). Photovoice as a community-based participatory research method: A case study with African American breast cancer survivors in rural eastern North Carolina. In IsraelB.EngE.SchultzA.ParkerE.SatcherD. (Eds.), Methods in community-based participatory research for health (pp. 326–348). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
86.
LundyL. (2007). “Voice” is not enough: Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 927–942.
87.
*LuttrellW. (2010). “A camera is a big responsibility”: A lens for analyzing children’s visual voices. Visual Studies, 25, 224–237.
88.
MarceloK.LopezM.KirbyE. (2007). Civic engagement among minority youth. Medford, MA: The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
89.
MatthewsH.LimbM. (1999). Defining the agenda for the geography of children: Review and prospect. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 61–90.
90.
MedirattaK.ShahS.McAlisterS. (2009). Community organizing for stronger schools: Strategies and successes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
91.
*MessiasD.JenningsL.FordM.McLoughlinK.Parra-MedinaD. (2008). Societal images of youth: Representations and interpretations by youth actively engaged in their communities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 159–178.
92.
MillerP. (2012). Mapping educational opportunity zones: A geospatial analysis of neighborhood block groups. Urban Review, 44, 189–218.
93.
MirraN.FilipiakD.GarciaA. (2015). Revolutionizing inquiry in urban English classrooms: Pursuing voice and justice through youth participatory action research. English Journal, 105(2), 49–57.
94.
MirraN.MorrellE.CainE.ScorzaD.FordA. (2013). Educating for a critical democracy: Civic participation reimagined in the council of youth research. Democracy and Education, 21(1), 1–10.
95.
*MorrellE. (2004). Becoming critical researchers: Literacy and empowerment for urban youth. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
96.
*MorrellE. (2007). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York, NY: Routledge.
97.
*MorrellE.DueñasR.GarciaV.LópezJ. (2013). Critical media pedagogy: Teaching for achievement in city schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
98.
NeumanS. B.CelanoD. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 8–26.
99.
*NicoteraJ. (2008). Building skills for civic engagement: Children as agents of neighborhood change. Journal of Community Practice, 16, 221–242. doi:10.1080/10705420801998045
100.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
101.
*PellegrinoA.ZenkovK.GallagherM.LongL. (2016). Picturing new notions of civic engagement in the U.S.: Youth-facilitated, visually-based explorations of the perspectives of our least franchised and most diverse citizens. In GreeneS.BurkeK.McKennaM. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp. 25–49). New York, NY: Routledge.
102.
*PritzkerS.LaChapelleA.TatumJ. (2012). “We need their help”: Encouraging and discouraging adolescent civic engagement through photovoice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2247–2254.
103.
*RhoadesM. (2012). LGBTQ youth + video artivism: Arts-based critical civic praxis. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 53, 317–329.
104.
Richards-SchusterK.DobbieD. (2011). Tagging walls and planting seeds: Creating spaces for youth civic action. Journal of Community Practice, 19, 234–251. doi:10.1080/10705422.2011.595283
105.
RodriguezR. J. (2017). Enacting adolescent literacies across communities: Latino/a scribes and their rites. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
106.
*RogersT.WintersK.LaMondeM. (2014). Youth, critical literacies, and civic engagement: Arts, media, and literacy in the lives of adolescents. New York, NY: Routledge.
107.
*SalazarJ. (2010). Digital stories and emerging citizens’ media practices by migrant youth in Western Sydney. Journal of Community, Citizen’s and Third Sector Media and Communication, 7, 65–84.
108.
SharkeyP. (2013). Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
109.
*SoepL.ChavezV. (2010). Drop that knowledge: Youth radio stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
110.
SojaE. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
111.
SternM.SeifertS. (2009). Civic engagement and the arts: Issues of conceptualization and measurement. Philadelphia, PA: Arts and Civic Engagement Impact Initiative of Animating Democracy and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
112.
TuanY. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
113.
*TeixeiraS. (2015). “It seems like no one cares”: Participatory photo mapping to understand youth perspectives on property vacancy. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 390–414.
114.
*ThomsonP. (2008). Young people: Voices in visual research. In ThomsonP. (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Routledge.
115.
TuckE. (2009). Re-visioning action: Participatory action research and Indigenous theories of change. Urban Review, 41(1), 47–65.
116.
TuckE. (2013). Uncollapsing ethics: Racialized scientism, settler coloniality, and an ethical framework of decolonial participatory action research. In KressT.MalottC.PorfilioB. (Eds.), Challenging status quo retrenchment (pp. 3–27). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
117.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
118.
*TupperJ.CarsonT.JohnsonI.MangatJ. (2008). Building place: Children’s negotiation of spaces and citizenship in schools. Canadian Journal of Education, 31, 1065–1092.
*ValaitisR. (2005). Computers and the Internet: Tools for youth empowerment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(5), 1–20.
121.
*VasudevanL.DeJaynesT. (Eds.). (2013). Arts, media and justice: Multimodal explorations with youth. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
122.
*WallersteinN.Sanchez-MerkiV.VerladeL. (2005). Freirian praxis in health education and community organizing: A case study of an adolescent prevention program. In MinklerM. (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (2nd ed., pp. 218–239). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
123.
*WangC.PiesC. A. (2004). Family, maternal, and child health through photovoice. Maternal and Child Health, 8, 95–102.
124.
*WangC.PiesC. A. (2008). Using photovoice for participatory assessment and issue selection: Lessons from a family, maternal, and child health department. In MinklerM.WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (pp. 183–197). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
125.
*WangC. C.CashJ.PowersL. (2000). Who knows the streets as well as the homeless? Promoting personal and community action through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 81–89.
126.
*WaltonG.SchleienS.BrakeL.TrovatoC.OakesT. (2012). Photovoice: A collaborative methodology giving voice to underserved populations seeking community inclusion. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46, 168–178.
127.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 237–269.
128.
*WexlerL.GubriumA.GriffinM.DiFulvioG. (2013). Promoting positive youth development and highlighting reasons for living in Northwest Alaska through digital storytelling. Health Promotion Practice, 14, 617–623.
129.
*WilsonN.DashoS.MartinA.WallersteinN.WangC.MinklerM. (2007). Engaging young adolescents in social action through photovoice: The Youth Empowerment Strategies (YES!) Project. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 241–261.
130.
WinnM. (2016). Still writing in rhythm: Youth poets at work. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085916641174
131.
WinnM.WinnL. (2016). “We want this to be owned by you.” The promise and perils of youth participatory action research. In GreeneS.BurkeK.McKennaM. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp. 50–67). New York, NY: Routledge.
132.
*WoodB. E. (2016). Excluded citizens? Participatory research with young people from a “failing” school community. Children’s Geographies, 14, 310–324.
133.
ZeldinS.CaminoL.CalvertM. (2003). Toward an understanding of youth in community governance: Policy priorities and research directions. Social Policy Report: Giving Child and Youth Development Knowledge Away, 17, 1–20.
134.
*ZenkovK.HarmonJ.BellA.EwaidaM.LynchM. (2011). What leadership looks like: Using photographs to see the school leaders city youth desire. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 119–157.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
