The history of research on interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4 through 12 dates back to 19th-century case studies of seemingly intelligent children who were unable to learn to read. Physicians, psychologists, educators, and others were determined to help them. In the process, they launched a century of research on a wide variety of approaches to reading intervention. As shown in this systematic narrative review, much has changed over time in the conceptualization of reading interventions and the methods used to determine their efficacy in improving outcomes for struggling readers. Building on the knowledge gathered over the past 100 years, researchers and practitioners are well-poised to continue to make progress in developing and testing reading interventions over the next 100 years.
*AbbottS. P.BerningerV. W. (1999). It’s never too late to remediate: Teaching word recognition to students with reading disabilities in Grades 4-7. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 223–250. doi:10.1007/s11881-999-0025-x
2.
*AlfassiM. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 309–332. doi:10.3102/00028312035002309
3.
*AllinderR. M.DunseL.BrunkenC. D.Obermiller-KrolikowskiH. J. (2001). Improving fluency in at-risk readers and students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 48–45. doi:10.1177/074193250102200106
4.
*AmbleB. R.ButlerG. (1966). Phrase-reading training and the reading achievement of slow learners: An experimental study. Journal of Special Education, 1, 119–123. doi:10.1177/002246696600100203
5.
*AndersP. L.BosC. S.FilipD. (1984). The effect of semantic feature analysis on the reading comprehension of learning-disabled students. In NilesJ. S.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), Changing perspectives on reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 162–166). Rochester, NY: The National Reading Conference.
6.
*AtkinsonJ. K.CochraneK. J.ElkinsJ. (1968). Retarded readers at high school start: An investigation in diagnosis and treatment. Slow Learning Child, 15, 67–83. doi:10.1080/0156655680150202
7.
*BalowB. (1965). The long-term effect of remedial reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 18, 581–586.
8.
BalowB. (1971). Perceptual-motor activities in the treatment of severe reading disability. The Reading Teacher, 24, 513–525.
9.
BarqueroL. A.DavisN.CuttingL. E. (2014). Neuroimaging of reading intervention: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis. PloS one, 9, e83668.
10.
*BartletD.ShapiroM. B. (1956). Investigation and treatment of a reading disability in a dull child with severe psychiatric disturbances. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 180–190. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1956.tb01378.x
11.
BellJ. E. (1945). Emotional factors in the treatment of reading difficulties. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 9, 125–131.
12.
*BemboomC. M.McMasterK. L. (2013). A comparison of lower- and higher-resourced tier 2 reading interventions for high school sophomores. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 184–195. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12020
13.
BerkR. A. (Ed.). (1981). Educational evaluation methodology: The state of the art. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
*BerkeleyS.MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (2011). Reading comprehension strategy instruction and attribution retraining for secondary students with learning and other mild disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 18–32. doi:10.1177/0022219410371677
15.
*BhatP.GriffinC. C.SindelairP. T. (2003). Phonological awareness instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 73–87.
16.
*BhattacharyaA.EhriL. C. (2004). Graphosyllabic analysis helps adolescent struggling readers read and spell words. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 331–348.
17.
BiancarosaC.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
18.
*BiggsM. C.HomanS. P.DedrickR.MinickV.RasinskiT. (2008). Using an interactive singing software program: A comparative study of struggling middle school readers. Reading Psychology, 29, 195–213. doi:10.1080/02702710802073438
19.
*BillingsleyB. S.WildmanT. M. (1988). The effects of prereading activities on the comprehension monitoring of learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research, 4, 36–44.
20.
BlanchardP. (1946). Psychoanalytic contributions to the problems of reading disabilities. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 163–187.
21.
*BlockC.ParrisS. R.ReedK. L.WhiteleyC. S.ClevelandM. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 262–281. doi:10.1037/a0014319
22.
*BloomerR. H. (1964). Progressive choice reading techniques in a remedial reading clinic. Journal of Educational Research, 57, 486–488.
23.
BoardmanA. G.KlingnerJ. K.BuckleyP.AnnammaS.LasserC. J. (2015). The efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading in middle school science and social studies classes. Reading and Writing, 28, 1257–1283. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9570-3
24.
*BookbinderK. F.FlierlN. T. (1968). A plan for teaching pupils with severe reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 140–147. doi:10.1177/002221946800100207
25.
*BorkowskiJ. G.WeyhingR. S.CarrM. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46–53. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.46
26.
*BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31–42.
27.
*BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1992). Using interactive teaching and learning strategies to promote text comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39, 225–238. doi:10.1080/0156655920390305
28.
*BosC. S.AndersP. L.FilipD.JaffeL. E. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384–390.
29.
*BoyleJ. R. (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 19, 86–98.
30.
*BrailsfordA.SnartF.DasJ. P. (1984). Strategy training and reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 287–290. doi:10.1177/002221948401700508
31.
*BrownR. I. (1967). A remedial reading program for the adolescent illiterate. Journal of Special Education, 1, 409–417. doi:10.1177/002246696700100411
32.
*BuergerT. A. (1968). A follow-up of remedial reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 21, 329–334.
33.
*BurnsM. K.HodgsonJ.ParkerD. C.FremontK. (2011). Comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of text previewing and preteaching keywords as small-group reading comprehension strategies with middle-school students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 241–252. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.519097
34.
*BurtC.LewisR. B. (1946). Teaching backward readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 116–132.
35.
*ButlerS. R. (1991). Reading program—remedial, integrated, and innovative. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 119–127. doi:10.1007/BF02648081
36.
*CalhoonM. (2005). Effects of a peer-mediated phonological skill and reading comprehension program on reading skill acquisition for middle school students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 424–433. doi:10.1177/00222194050380050501
37.
*CalhoonM.SandowA.HunterC. V. (2010). Reorganizing the instructional reading components: Could there be a better way to design remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities’ response to treatment?Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 57–85. doi:10.1007/s11881-009-0033-x
38.
*CameronJ. L.BorstC. A.FiferW. P.LaVigneG. L.SmithS. A. (1972). Remedial reading: A psychoanalytic and operant approach. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 45, 273–278. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1972.tb02209.x
39.
*CampB. W.van DoorninckW. J. (1971). Assessment of “motivated” reading therapy with elementary school children. Behavior Therapy, 2, 214–222.
40.
*CantrellS.AlamsiJ.CarterJ.RintamaaM.MaddenA. (2010). The impact of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 257–280. doi:10.1037/a0018212
41.
*ChanL. K.ColeP. G. (1986). The effects of comprehension monitoring training on the reading competence of learning disabled and regular class students. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 33–40. doi:10.1177/074193258600700407
42.
*ChanL. K.ColeP. G.MorrisJ. N. (1990). Effects of instruction in the use of a visual-imagery strategy on the reading-comprehension competence of disabled and average readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 2–11. doi:10.2307/1510388
43.
*ChanK. S. (1991). Promoting strategy instruction generalization through self-instructional training in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 427–290.
44.
ChoE.RobertsG. J.CapinP.RobertsG.MiciakJ.VaughnS. (2015). Cognitive attributes, attention, and self-efficacy of adequate and inadequate responders in a fourth grade reading intervention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 159–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12088
*ColemanJ. C. (1953). Results of a ‘total-push’ approach to remedial education. Elementary School Journal, 53, 454–458. doi:10.1086/458523
47.
*CollyerM. A. (1940). Improving reading in the ninth grade. The English Journal, 29, 37–43.
48.
ComptonD. L.MillerA. C.EllemanA. M.SteacyL. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability?Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55–73.
49.
*ConteR.HumphreysR. (1989). Repeated readings using audiotaped material enhances oral reading in children with reading difficulties. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 65–79.
50.
*CowinP.GraffV. (1969). Comprehensive treatment of the older disabled reader. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 19, 100–112. doi:10.1007/BF02653566
51.
*CurrW. M.GourlayN. (1953). An experimental evaluation of remedial education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 45–55.
52.
*DamerauR. (1934). Influence of treatment on the reading ability and behavior disorders of reading disability cases. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 5, 160–183.
53.
*DarchC.EavesR. (1986). Visual displays to increase comprehension of high school learning-disabled students. Journal of Special Education, 20, 309–318.
54.
*DarchC.GerstenR. (1986). Direct setting activities in reading comprehension: A comparison of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 235–243.
55.
*DarchC. B.KameenuiE. J. (1987). Teaching LD students critical reading skills: A systematic replication. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 82–91. doi:10.2307/1510215
56.
DelacatoC. H. (1963). The diagnosis and treatment of speech and reading problems. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
57.
*DiCeccoV. M.GleasonM. M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository texts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 306–320.
58.
*DilibertoJ. A.BeattieJ. R.FlowersC. P.AlgozzineR. F. (2009). Effects of teaching syllable skills instruction on reading achievement in struggling middle school readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 14–27. doi:10.1080/19388070802226253
59.
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
60.
Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 107-279, § 116, Stat. 1941 (2002).
61.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. Pub. L. No. 89-10, § 79, Stat. 27 (1965).
62.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM. T.MoodyS. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.605
63.
*EllisA. (1949). Results of a mental hygiene approach to reading disability problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 13, 56–61.
64.
*EnglertC. S.MariageT. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading “posse.”Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 123–138. doi:10.2307/1510519
65.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015. Pub. L. No. 114-95, § 1000 et seq., Stat. 1814 (2015).
66.
FabianA. A. (1955). Reading disability: An index of pathology. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 25, 319–329.
67.
*Faggella-LubyM.WardwellM. (2011). RTI in a middle school: Findings and practical implications of a tier 2 reading comprehension study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 35–49.
68.
FarrR.TuinmanJ. J. (1972). The dependent variable: Measurement issues in reading research. Reading Research Quarterly, 7, 413–423.
69.
FernaldG. M.KellerH. (1921). The effect of kinaesthetic factors in the development of word recognition in the case of non-readers. Journal of Educational Research, 4, 335–377.
70.
FernaldG. M.KellerH. (1936). On certain language disabilities: Their nature and treatment. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
71.
*FleisherL. S.JenkinsJ. R. (1983). The effect of word- and comprehension-emphasis instruction on reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 146–154. doi:10.2307/1510792
72.
FleschR. F. (1955). Why Johnny can’t read and what you can do about it. New York, NY: Harper.
73.
FlynnL. J.ZhengX.SwansonH. L. (2012). Instructing struggling older readers: A selective meta-analysis of intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 21–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00347.x
74.
*FontM. M. (1942). Orientation in clinical approach through remedial reading instruction. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 12, 324–334.
75.
*ForlanoG.WritestoneJ. W. (1956). Measuring the effectiveness of special reading instruction in selected vocational high schools. High Points, 38, 31–36.
76.
*FreedH.AbramsJ.PeiferC. (1959). Reading disability: A new therapeutic approach and its implications. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychopathology & Quarterly Review of Psychiatry and Neurology, 20, 251–259.
77.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 13–18. doi:10.1177/0040059914522966
78.
*FuchsL. S.FuchsD.KazdanS. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309–319.
79.
*GajriaM.SalviaJ. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508–516.
80.
GatesA. I. (1922). Teachers College contributions to education: Vol. 129. The psychology of reading and spellingwith special, reference to disability. New York, NY: Teachers College.
81.
GatesA. I. (1927). The improvement of reading (1st ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
82.
GatesA. I. (1935). The improvement of reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
83.
GatesA. I. (1941). The role of personality maladjustment in reading disability. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 59, 77–83.
84.
*GatesA. I.BondG. L. (1936). Some outcomes of instruction in the Speyer Experimental School (P.S. 500). Teachers College Record, 38, 206–217.
85.
*GivenB. K.WassermanJ. D.ChariS. A.BeattieK.EdenG. F. (2008). A randomized, controlled study of computer-based intervention in middle school struggling readers. Brain and Language, 106, 83–97. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.001
86.
GlassG. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Education Researcher, 10, 3–8.
87.
*GormlyJ.NittoliM. J. (1971). Rapid improvement of reading skills in juvenile delinquents. Journal of Experimental Education, 40, 45–48.
88.
*GravesA. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 90–100.
89.
*GravesA. W.DuesberyL.PyleN. B.BrandonR. R.McIntoshA. S. (2011). Two studies of tier II literacy development: Throwing sixth graders a lifeline. Elementary School Journal, 111, 641–661. doi:10.1086/659036
90.
*GravesA. W.LevinJ. R. (1989). Comparison of monitoring and mnemonic text-processing strategies in learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 232–236. doi:10.2307/1510693
91.
GrayW. S. (1916a). Methods of testing reading: I. Elementary School Journal, 16, 231–246.
92.
GrayW. S. (1916b). Methods of testing reading: II. Elementary School Journal, 16, 281–298.
93.
GrayW. S. (1921). Diagnostic and remedial steps in reading. Journal of Educational Research, 4, 1–15.
94.
GrayW. S. (1922). Remedial cases in reading: Their diagnosis and treatment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
95.
GrayW. S. (Ed.). (1925). Report of the national committee on reading (24th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
96.
*GroverV. M. (1962). The suitability of small group teaching in cases of reading and spelling disability among young primary school children. Journal for Social Research, 13, 19–28.
97.
*GünzburgH. C. (1948). The unsuccessful reader. Mental Health, 8(2), 34–37.
98.
*GuthrieJ. T.McRaeA.CoddingtonC. S.KlaudaS.WigfieldA.BarbosaP. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 195–214. doi:10.1177/0022219408331039
99.
*HaringN. G.HauckM. A. (1969). Improved learning conditions in the establishment of reading skills with disabled readers. Exceptional Children, 35, 341–352.
100.
HarrisA. J. (1967, May). Five decades of remedial reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association conference, Seattle, WA.
101.
*HarrisM.SchumakerJ.DeshlerD. (2011). The effects of strategic morphological analysis instruction on the vocabulary performance of secondary students with and without disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 17–33.
102.
*HasselbringT. S.GoinL. I. (2004). Literacy instruction for older struggling readings: What is the role of technology?Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 123–144.
103.
*HesterK. B. (1946). Dade County meets the reading problem. Elementary School Journal, 47, 148–156.
104.
*HicksR. A.HicksM. J.KelloggM.HonnenR. (1968). Reading gains and instructional sessions. The Reading Teacher, 21, 738–739, 744.
105.
HildrethG. (1942). The psychologist investigates reading disability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 6, 212–217.
106.
*HomanS. P.KlesiusJ. P.HiteC. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students’ fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94–99.
107.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Pub. L. No. 108-446, § 118, Stat. 2647 (2004).
*JacksonM.DandoF. (1976). An evaluation of the Delacto method for the facilitation of reading behavior. The Exceptional Child, 23, 113–118.
110.
*JitendraA. K.HoppesM. K.XinY. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
111.
*JohnsonG.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1987). Effects of instructional design variables on vocabulary acquisition of learning disabilities students: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 206–213.
112.
KaldenbergE.WattS.TherrienW. (2015). Reading instruction in science for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 160–173.
113.
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
114.
KellyF. J. (1916). The Kansas silent reading tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 63–80.
115.
*KennedyK. M.BackmanJ. (1993) Effectiveness of the Lindamood auditory in depth program with students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 253–259.
116.
*KennedyM. J.ThomasC. N.MeyerJ. P.AlvesK. D.LloydJ. W. (2014). Using evidence-based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 71–86. doi:10.1177/0731948713507262
117.
*KimA.VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.WoodruffA. L.ReutebuchC.KouzekananiK. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 235–249. doi:10.1177/07419325060270040401
118.
*KimJ. S.SamsonJ. F.FitzgeraldR.HartryA. (2010). A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in Grades 4–6: Effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 23, 1109–1129. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9198-2
119.
*KlineC. L.KlineC. L.AshbrennerM.CalkinsS. (1968). The treatment of specific dyslexia in a community mental health centre. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 456–465. doi:10.1177/002221946800100805
120.
*KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. Elementary School Journal, 96, 275–293.
121.
KrafnickA. J.FlowersD. L.NapolielloE. M.EdenG. F. (2011). Gray matter volume changes following reading intervention in dyslexic children. Neuroimage, 57, 733–741.
122.
KunstM. S. (1959). Learning disabilities: Their dynamics and treatment. Social Work, 4, 95–101.
123.
KussmaulA. (1877). Cyclopedia of the practice of medicine: Vol. 14. Disturbances of speech: An attempt in the pathology of speech (von ZiemssenH., Ed., & McCreeryJ. A., Trans). New York, NY: William Wood.
124.
*LaffeyR. (1950). A program in remedial reading. Elementary English, 27, 230–239.
125.
*LaneA. (1974). Severe reading disability and the initial teaching alphabet. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 479–483. doi:10.1177/002221947400700803
126.
*LaneP. R. (1970). Educational therapy for adolescent nonreaders. Intervention in School and Clinic, 6, 155–159. doi:10.1177/1053451270006000205
127.
*LangL.TorgesenJ.VogelW.ChanterC.LefskyE.PetscherY (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 149–175. doi:10.1080/19345740802641535
128.
LemonsC. J.FuchsD.GilbertJ. K.FuchsL. S. (2014). Evidence-based practices in a changing world: Reconsidering the counterfactual in education research. Educational Researcher, 43, 242–252. doi:10.3102/0013189X14539189
129.
*LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.KelleyJ. G.HarrisJ. R. (2014). Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents: Evidence from a randomized field trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 1159–1194. doi:10.3102/0002831214532165
130.
*LloydJ.CullinanD.HeinsE. D.EpsteinM. H. (1980). Direct instruction: Effects on oral and written language comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 70–76. doi:10.2307/1510677
131.
*LoudenB.ArthurG. (1940). An application of the Fernald method to an extreme case of reading disability. Elementary School Journal, 40, 599–606. doi:10.1086/457811
132.
*LovellK.JohnsonE.PlattsD. (1962). A summary of a study of the reading ages of children who had been given remedial teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 66–71. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1962.tb01734.x
133.
*LovettM. W.LacerenzaL.De PalmaM.FrijtersJ. C. (2012). Evaluating the efficacy of remediation for struggling readers in high school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 151–169. doi:10.1177/0022219410371678
134.
*LovittT. C. (1975). Applied behavior analysis and learning disabilities: Part II: Specific research recommendations and suggestions for practitioners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 504–518. doi:10.1177/002221947500800809
135.
*MacarusoP.RodmanA. (2009). Benefits of computer-assisted instruction for struggling readers in middle school. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24, 103–113. doi:10.1080/08856250802596774
136.
MacGinitieW. H. (1980). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson.
137.
*MaloneL. D.MastropieriM. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270–279.
138.
*Manset-WilliamsonG.NelsonJ. M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59–74. doi:10.2307/4126973
139.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT.BakkenJ.WhedonC. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 10B, 201–227.
*MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT.MohlerL.BeranekM.SpencerV.BoonR. T.TalbottE. (2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 18–27.
142.
*MathesP. G.FuchsL. S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 233–243.
143.
*McCallumR.KrohnK. R.SkinnerC. H.Hilton-PrillhartA.HopkinsM.WallerS.PoliteF. (2011). Improving reading comprehension of at-risk high-school students: The Art of Reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 78–86. doi:10.1002/pits.20541
144.
McGannM. (1947). Dramatic dialogues for simultaneous treatment of reading and personality problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 96–104. doi:10.1037/h0055961
145.
*McKerracherD. W. (1967). Alleviation of reading difficulties by a simple operant conditioning technique. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 51–56. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1967.tb02180.x
146.
*McLooneB. B.ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.ZuckerS. F. (1986). Memory strategy instruction and training with learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 45–52.
147.
*MeikleS.KilpatrickD. L. (1971). Changes in perceptual, motor, and reading test scores in a remedial reading group. The Canadian Psychologist, 12, 254–269.
148.
*MeyerB. F.WijekumarK. K.LinY. (2011). Individualizing a web-based structure strategy intervention for fifth graders’ comprehension of nonfiction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 140–168. doi:10.1037/a0021606
149.
MiciakJ.StuebingK. K.VaughnS.RobertsG.BarthA. E.FletcherJ. M. (2014). Cognitive attributes of adequate and inadequate responders to reading intervention in middle school. School Psychology Review, 43, 407–427. doi:10.17105/SPR-13-0052.1
150.
*MonroeM. (1937). Remedial reading: A monograph in character education. Boston, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
151.
*MooreP. J.ScevakJ. J. (1995). The effects of strategy training on high school students’ learning from science texts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 401–410.
152.
MorganW. P. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 2(1871), 1378.
153.
National Defense Education Act of 1958, Pub. L. No. 85-864, § 72 Stat. 1580.
154.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
155.
*NiedoJ.LeeY.-L.BreznitzZ.BerningerV. W. (2014). Computerized silent reading rate and strategy instruction for fourth graders at risk in silent reading rate. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 100–110. doi:10.1177/0731948713507263
156.
*O’BrienF. J. (1938). A child guidance approach to the treatment of a severe reading disability. Understanding the Child, 7, 22–26.
157.
*OrtonS. T. (1925). Word blindness in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581–615.
158.
*O’SheaL. J.SindelarP.O’SheaD. J. (1987). Effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on the reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103–109.
159.
*PanyD.JenkinsJ. R.SchreckJ. (1982). Vocabulary instruction: Effects on word knowledge and reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 202–215. doi:10.2307/1510288
160.
*PenneyC. G. (2002). Teaching decoding skills to poor readers in high school. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 99–118.
161.
PetticrewM.RobertsH. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470754887
162.
PyleN.VaughnS. (2012). Remediating reading difficulties in a response to intervention model with secondary students. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 273–284. doi:10.1002/pits.21593
163.
*RasinskiT.SamuelsS.HiebertE.PetscherY.FellerK. (2011). The relationship between a silent reading fluency instructional protocol on students’ reading comprehension and achievement in an urban school setting. Reading Psychology, 32, 75–97. doi:10.1080/02702710903346873
164.
*RedmountR. S. (1948). Description and evaluation of a corrective program for reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, 347–358.
165.
*RegensburgJ. (1930, June). Retraining in reading: A new method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Psychiatric Social Workers, Boston, MA.
166.
*RichardsonE.CollierL. (1971). Programmed tutoring of decoding skills with third and fifth grade non-readers. Journal of Experimental Education, 39, 57–64.
167.
*RichardsonD. C.HavlicekL. L. (1975). High school students as reading instructors. Elementary School Journal, 75, 389–393. doi:10.1086/460922
168.
*RitcheyK. D.SilvermanR. D.MontanaroE. A.SpeeceD. L.SchatschneiderC. (2012). Effects of a tier 2 supplemental reading intervention for at-risk fourth-grade students. Exceptional Children, 78, 318–334. doi:10.1177/001440291207800304
169.
*RobertsG.VaughnS.FletcherJ.StuebingK.BarthA. (2013). Effects of a response-based, tiered framework for intervening with struggling readers in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 237–254. doi:10.1002/rrq.47
170.
RobinsonH. (1939). Types of deficient readers and methods of treatment. Supplementary Educational Monographs, 49, 159–169.
171.
*RobinsonH. (1949). Problems of seriously retarded readers from the Chicago community. In Clinical studies in reading (Vol. 1, Supplementary Educational Monograph, No. 68) (pp. 114–173). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
172.
*RybackD.StaatsA. W. (1970). Parents as behavior therapy-technicians in treating reading deficits (dyslexia). Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1, 109–119. doi:10.1016/0005-7916(70)90034-0
173.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.. . . TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Reading interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
174.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.StuebingK. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4-12: 1980-2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 369–390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
175.
*SchonfieldD. (1956). Special difficulties at a reading age of 8+. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 39–50.
176.
*SchwormR. W. (1979). The effects of selective attention on the decoding skills of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 639–644.
177.
*SeemanJ.EdwardsB. (1954). A therapeutic approach to reading difficulties. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 18, 451–453.
178.
*SheddC. L. (1968). Dyslexia and its clinical management. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 171–184. doi:10.1177/002221946800100302
179.
*ShippenM. E.HouchinsD. E.SteventonC.SartorD. (2005). A comparison of two direct instruction reading programs for urban middle school students. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 175–182. doi:10.1177/07419325050260030501
180.
*ShippenM. E.MortonR. C.FlyntS. W.HouchinsD. E.SmithermanT. (2012). Efficacy of a computer-based program on acquisition of reading skills of incarcerated youth. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 14–22. doi:10.1177/0741932510362512
181.
*SilverA. A.HaginR. A.HershM. F. (1967). Reading disability: Teaching through stimulation of deficit perceptual areas. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 37, 744–752. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1967.tb00516.x
182.
*SimpsonS. B.SwansonJ. M.KunkelK. (1992). The impact of an intensive multisensory reading program on a population of learning-disabled delinquents. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 54–66. doi:10.1007/BF02654938
183.
SmithN. B. (2002). American reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
184.
*SniderV. E. (1989). Reading comprehension performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 87–96.
185.
*SomersM.CorrinW.SepanikS.SalingerT.LevinJ.ZmachC. (2010). The enhanced reading opportunity study final report: The impact of supplemental literacy courses for struggling ninth-grade readers. Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education.
186.
*SomervilleD. E.LeachD. J. (1988). Direct or indirect instruction? An evaluation of three types of intervention programme for assisting students with specific reading difficulties. Educational Research, 30, 46–53. doi:10.1080/0013188880300106
187.
*SpencerS.ManisF. (2010). The effects of a fluency intervention program on fluency and comprehension outcomes of middle-school students with severe reading deficits. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 76–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00305.x
188.
*StaatsA. W.MinkeK. A.GoodwinW. (1967). Cognitive behavior modification: “Motivated learning” reading treatment with subprofessional therapy-technicians. Behavior Research and Therapy, 5, 283–299. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(67)90020-4
189.
*SteinerR.WienerM.CromerW. (1971). Comprehension training and identification for poor and good readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 506–513.
190.
*StoddardK.ValcanteG.SindelarP.O’SheaL. (1993). Increasing reading rate and comprehension: The effects of repeated readings, sentence segmentation, and intonation training. Literacy Research and Instruction, 32, 53–65.
191.
*SullivanJ. (1972). The effects of Kephart’s perceptual motor-training on a reading clinic sample. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 545–551.
192.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.VaughnS.FallA.-M.RobertsG.HallC.MillerV. (in press). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below average readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly.
193.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis in intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504–532. doi:10.1177/002221949903200605
194.
*SwenbyC.ZielsdorfM. (1951). A remedial-reading program in a senior high school. The School Review, 59, 350–357.
195.
*SylvesterE.KunstM. S. (1943). Psychodynamic aspects of the reading problem. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 13, 69–76.
196.
*ThamesD. G.ReevesC.KazelskisR.YorkK.BolingC.NewellK.WangY. (2008). Reading comprehension: Effects of individualized, integrated language arts as a reading approach with struggling readers. Reading Psychology, 29, 86–115. doi:10.1080/02702710701853625
197.
*TherrienW. J.WickstromK.JonesK. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 89–97. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00209.x
198.
ThorndikeE. L. (1914). The measurement of ability in reading. Teachers College Record, 15, 1–70.
199.
TinkerM. A. (1934). Remedial reading for non-readers. School & Society, 40, 524–526.
200.
TinkerM. A. (1938). Trends in diagnostic and remedial reading as shown by recent publications in this field. Journal of Educational Research, 32, 293–303.
201.
TomkinsC. (1963, September14). A reporter at large: The last skill acquired. The New Yorker, 39(30), 127–128.
202.
TorgesenJ. K. (1977). Memorization processes in reading-disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 571–578.
203.
TorgesenJ. K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 2, 45–52.
204.
*TorgesenJ. K.StancavageF.MyersD.SchirmA.StuartE.VartivarianS.. . . HaanC. (2006). Closing the reading gap: First year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
205.
*TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.AlexanderA. W.ConwayT. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 8, 51–61.
206.
TraxlerA. E. (1941). Ten years of research in reading: Summary and bibliography. New York, NY: Educational Records Bureau.
207.
UhlW. L. (1916). The use of the results of reading tests as bases for planning remedial work. Elementary School Journal, 17, 266–275.
208.
UllmannC. A. (1949). A public health approach to improving community mental health through the schools. Public Health Reports, 64, 1655–1660.
209.
*VadasyP. F.SandersE. A. (2008). Benefits of repeated reading intervention for low-achieving fourth- and fifth-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 235–249. doi:10.1177/0741932507312013
210.
*Van OsdolB. M.JohnsonD. M.GeigerL. (1974). The effects of total body movement on reading achievement. Australian Journal of Mental Retardation, 3, 16–19. doi:10.3109/13668257409018751
211.
*VaughnS.CirinoP.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ.DentonC.. . . FrancisD. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21.
212.
VaughnS.ElbaumB. E.WanzekJ.ScammaccaN.WalkerM. A. (2014). Code sheet and guide for education-related intervention study syntheses. Austin, TX: The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk.
213.
*VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE. A.BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.MohammedS. S.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–964. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
214.
*VaughnS.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.BarthA.CirinoP.FletcherJ.…FrancisD. (2010). The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 23, 931–956. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9183-9
215.
*VaughnS.WexlerJ.LerouxA.RobertsG.DentonC.BarthA.FletcherJ. (2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 515–525. doi:10.1177/0022219411402692
216.
*VaughnS.WexlerJ.RobertsG.BarthA. A.CirinoP. T.RomainM. A.. . . DentonC. A. (2011). Effects of individualized and standardized interventions on middle school students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77, 391–407.
217.
*VeitD. T.ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1986). Extended mnemonic instruction with learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 300–308.
218.
*WanzekJ.RobertsG. (2012). Reading interventions with varying instructional emphases for fourth graders with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 90–101. doi:10.1177/0731948711434047
219.
*WanzekJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.FletcherJ. M. (2011). Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 73–87.
220.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.MetzK.MurrayC. S.RobertsG.DanielsonL. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163–195. doi:10.3102/0034654313477212
221.
WanzekJ.WexlerJ.VaughnS.CiulloS. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889–912. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
222.
*WexlerJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.DentonC. A. (2010). The efficacy of repeated reading and wide reading practice for high school students with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 2–10. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00296.x
223.
*WilderA. A.WilliamsJ. P. (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 268–278.
224.
*WilliamsJ. P.BrownL. G.SilversteinA. K.deCaniJ. S. (1994). An instructional program in comprehension of narrative themes for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 17, 205–221.
225.
WillinghamD. T. (2007). Ask the cognitive scientist: The usefulness of brief instruction in reading comprehension strategies. American Educator, 30(3), 39–45, 50.
226.
*WongB. Y.JonesW. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240. doi:10.2307/1510290
227.
*WordP.RozynkoV. (1974). Behavior therapy of an eleven-year-old-girl with reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 551–554. doi:10.1177/002221947400700904
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
