Impact of Removing Exit Exams on Graduation Rates

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, almost a third of states have removed requirements to pass exit exams to graduate high school. This brief leverages an original data set of state-level graduation requirements between 2008–2009 and 2019–2020 to identify the effects of removing exit exams on 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rates (ACGR). Removing exams led to increases in school-level ACGR of about 3 percentage points, with larger effects on the limited English proficient (LEP) ACGR at 10 percentage points and smaller effects on the ACGR for White students at 2 percentage points. The LEP ACGR is projected to increase each year, up 15 percentage points at 4 years after exam removal.

Keywords

assessment educational policy high schools quasi-experimental analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Callaway

Sant’Anna

P. H. C.

(2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001

The Center for State Policy Analysis. (2024). Voters’ guide to 2024 Massachusetts ballot questions. Tisch College, Tufts University. https://cspa.tufts.edu/2024-ballot-questions

FairTest. (2023). Graduation test update: States that recently eliminated or scaled back high school exit exams. https://fairtest.org/graduation-test-update-states-recently-eliminated/

Harris

D. N.

Liu

Barrett

(2023). Is the rise in high school graduation rates real? High-stakes school accountability and strategic behavior. Labour Economics, 82, Article 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102355

Hemelt

S. W.

Marcotte

D. E.

(2013). High school exit exams and dropout in an era of increased accountability. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21688

Warren

J. R.

Jenkins

K. N.

Kulick

R. B.

(2006). High school exit examinations and state-level completion and GED rates, 1975 through 2002. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737028002131

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.23 MB

0.00 MB