Growing evidence shows that a student’s growth mindset (the belief that intelligence is malleable) can benefit their academic achievement. However, less is known about how a teacher’s growth mindset affects their students’ academic performance. In this article, we study the impact of being assigned to a teacher with a growth mindset in a nationwide sample from Chile. Using data from two subject teachers per student, we find that having a teacher with a growth mindset increases standardized test scores by approximately 0.02 SD. The effect is larger for students with high grade point averages and those from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Exploratory analysis suggests that growth mindset teachers are more likely to employ effective classroom practices than those with a fixed mindset.
AguirreJ. (2022). How can progressive vouchers help the poor benefit from school choice? Evidence from the Chilean voucher system. Journal of Human Resources, 57(3), 956–997. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.3.0318-9386R2
2.
AlanS.BonevaT.ErtacS. (2019). Ever failed, try again, succeed better: Results from a randomized educational intervention on grit. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1121–1162.
3.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.
4.
BowlesS.GintisH.OsborneM. (2001). The determinants of earnings: A behavioral approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1137–1176.
5.
ClaroS.LoebS. (2024). Students with growth mindset learn more in school: Evidence from California’s CORE school districts. Educational Researcher, 53(7), 389–402.
6.
ClaroS.PauneskuD.DweckC. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–8668.
7.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school. A cross-subject analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681.
8.
DeeT. S. (2005). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter?American Economic Review, 95(2), 158–165.
9.
DeeT. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 528–554.
10.
DeeT. S.CohodesS. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(1), 7–32.
11.
DeLucaC.CoombsA.LaPointe-McEwanD. (2019). Assessment mindset: Exploring the relationship between teacher mindset and approaches to classroom assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 159–169.
12.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Taylor & Francis.
13.
DweckC. (2012). Mindset: Changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. Hachette UK.
14.
EgaliteA. J.KisidaB. (2018). The effects of teacher match on students’ academic perceptions and attitudes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 59–81.
15.
EgaliteA. J.KisidaB.WintersM. A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52.
16.
FarringtonC.LevensteinR.NagaokaJ. (2013). Becoming Effective Learnerssurvey development project. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED563049.pdf
17.
FrondozoC. E.KingR. B.NalipayM. J. N.MordenoI. G. (2022). Mindsets matter for teachers, too: Growth mindset about teaching ability predicts teachers’ enjoyment and engagement. Current Psychology, 41(8), 5030–5033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01008-4
18.
GershensonS.HoltS. B.PapageorgeN. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student–teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224.
19.
KraftM. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253.
20.
KraftM. A. (2023). The effect-size benchmark that matters most: Education interventions often fail. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 183–187.
21.
LaddH. F.SorensenL. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279.
22.
LaineS.TirriK. (2023). Literature review on teachers’ mindsets, growth-oriented practices and why they matter. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1275126. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1275126
23.
MetzlerJ.WoessmannL. (2012). The impact of teacher subject knowledge on student achievement: Evidence from within-teacher within-student variation. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 486–496.
ParedesV. (2014). A teacher like me or a student like me? Role model versus teacher bias effect. Economics of Education Review, 39, 38–49.
27.
ParkD.GundersonE. A.TsukayamaE.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000064
28.
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.
29.
PetekN.PopeN. G. (2023). The multidimensional impact of teachers on students. Journal of Political Economy, 131(4), 1057–1107.
30.
PorterT.Catalán MolinaD.CimpianA.RobertsS.FredericksA.BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. (2022). Growth-mindset intervention delivered by teachers boosts achievement in early adolescence. Psychological Science, 33(7), 1086–1096.
31.
RattanA.GoodC.DweckC. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737.
32.
RissanenI.KuusistoE.TuominenM.TirriK. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher’s classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204–213.
33.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
34.
Rubie-DaviesC. M.FlintA.McDonaldL. G. (2011). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 270–288.
35.
SchmidtJ. A.ShumowL.Kackar-CamH. (2015). Exploring teacher effects for mindset intervention outcomes in seventh-grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 17–32.
36.
SeatonF. S. (2018). Empowering teachers to implement a growth mindset. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(1), 41–57.
37.
SmithT.BrumskillR.JohnsonA.ZimmerT. (2018). The impact of teacher language on students’ mindsets and statistics performance. Social Psychology of Education, 21(4), 775–786.
38.
SpoorenP.BrockxB.MortelmansD. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642.
39.
TaylorR. D.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171.
40.
TrzesniewskiK.YeagerD.Catalán MolinaD.ClaroS.OberleC.MurphyM. (2021). Global mindset initiative paper 3: Measuring growth mindset classroom cultures. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911591
41.
WillinghamJ. C.BarlowA. T.StephensD. C.LischkaA. E.HartlandK. S. (2021). Mindset regarding mathematical ability in K-12 teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 121(4), 234–246.
42.
YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
43.
YeagerD. S.HanselmanP.WaltonG. M.MurrayJ. S.CrosnoeR.MullerC.TiptonE.SchneiderB.HullemanC. S.HinojosaC. P.PauneskuD.RomeroC.FlintK.RobertsA.TrottJ.IachanR.BuontempoJ.YangS. M.CarvalhoC. M.. . . DweckC. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
44.
YeagerD. S.RomeroC.PauneskuD.HullemanC. S.SchneiderB.HinojosaC.LeeH. Y.O’BrienJ.FlintK.RobertsA.TrottJ.GreeneD.WaltonG. M.DweckC. S. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098
45.
YeagerD. S.WaltonG. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301.
46.
ZengG.ChenX.CheungH. Y.PengK. (2019). Teachers’ growth mindset and work engagement in the Chinese educational context: Well-being and perseverance of effort as mediators. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00839
47.
ZilkaA.GrinshtainY.BoglerR. (2022). Fixed or growth: Teacher perceptions of factors that shape mindset. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689524
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
