“Grow Your Own” (GYO) programs have emerged as a new approach to expanding teacher supply, addressing localized shortages, and diversifying the profession. However, little is known about the scale and design of GYO programs, which recruit and support individuals from the local community to become teachers. We conduct a quantitative content analysis of 94 GYO initiatives and find that “GYO” is an umbrella term used to describe teacher pipeline programs with very different purposes, participants, and program features. Although nearly all GYO initiatives aim to increase local supply, far fewer offer programming aligned with reducing shortages in hard-to-staff subjects and schools, increasing diversity, and improving effectiveness. We propose a new classification scheme to facilitate more precise discussions of GYO programs.
BishtB.LeClairZ.LoebS.SunM. (2021). Paraeducators: Growth, diversity and a dearth of professional supports (EdWorkingPaper No. 21-490). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
2.
BlazarD.AnthenelliM.GaoW.GoingsR.GershensonS. (2024a). Disparate pathways: Understanding racial disparities in teaching (EdWorkingPaper No. 24-945). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
3.
BlazarD.GaoW.GershensonS.GoingsR.LagosF. (2024b). Do grow-your-own programs work? Evidence from the Teacher Academy of Maryland (EdWorkingPaper No. 24-958). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
4.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132.
ClotfelterC.GlennieE.LaddH.VigdorJ. (2008). Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1352–1370.
7.
EdwardsD. S.KraftM. A.ChristianA.CandelariaC. A. (2024). Teacher shortages: A framework for understanding and predicting vacancies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241235224
8.
EgaliteA.KisidaB.WintersM. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44–52.
9.
FengL.SassT. R. (2018). The impact of incentives to recruit and retain teachers in “hard-to-staff” subjects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(1), 112–135.
10.
FieldE. (2009). Educational debt burden and career choice: Evidence from a financial aid experiment at NYU Law School. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1), 1–21.
11.
FloresB.ClarkE.ClaeysL.VillarrealA. (2007). Academy for teacher excellence: Recruiting, preparing, and retaining Latino teachers through learning communities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 53–69.
GershensonS.HartC.HymanJ.LindsayC.PapageorgeN. (2022). The long-run impacts of same-race teachers. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(4), 300–342.
14.
GistC. D. (2019). For what purpose? Making sense of the various projects driving grow your own program development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(1), 9–22.
GistC. D. (2022b). Shifting dominant narratives of teacher development: New directions for expanding access to the educator workforce through grow your own programs. Educational Researcher, 51(1), 51–57.
17.
GistC.BiancoM.LynnM. (2019). Examining grow your own programs across the teacher development continuum: Mining research on teachers of color and nontraditional educator pipelines. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(1), 13–25.
18.
HenryG. T.BastianK. C.SmithA. A. (2012). Scholarships to recruit the “best and brightest” into teaching: Who is recruited, where do they teach, how effective are they, and how long do they stay?Educational Researcher, 41(3), 83–92.
19.
IrizarryJ. G. (2007). “Home-growing” teachers of color: Lessons learned from a town-gown partnership. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 87–102.
20.
JonesR.HoltonW.JosephM. (2019). Call me mister: Black male grow your own program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(1), 55–68.
21.
KleinerM. M. (2000). Occupational licensing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 189–202.
22.
KraftM. A.LyonM. A. (2024). The rise and fall of the teaching profession: Prestige, interest, preparation, and satisfaction over the last half century. American Educational Research Journal, 61(6), 1192–1236.
23.
LaskiM. E. (2024). Teacher in our midst: Using experienced school staff to solve teacher shortages (EdWorkingPaper No. 24-965). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
24.
LauK.DandyE.HoffmanL. (2007). The pathways program: A model for increasing the number of teachers of color. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(4), 27–40.
25.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
26.
LindsayC.HartC. (2017). Exposure to same-race teachers and student disciplinary outcomes for Black students in North Carolina. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 485–510.
PapayJ. P.WestM. R.FullertonJ. B.KaneT. J. (2012). Does an urban teacher residency increase student achievement? Early evidence from Boston. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 413–434.
ReddingC. (2022). Are homegrown teachers who graduate from urban districts more racially diverse, more effective, and less likely to exit teaching?American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 939–974.
32.
ReiningerM. (2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145.
33.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.
34.
SkinnerE.GarretonM.SchultzB. D. (2011). Grow your own teachers: Grassroots change for teacher education. Teaching for social justice. Teachers College Press.
35.
SteeleJ. L.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). Do financial incentives help low-performing schools attract and keep academically talented teachers? Evidence from California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 451–478.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
