Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A controversial, equity-focused mathematics reform in the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) featured delaying Algebra I until ninth grade for all students. This study examines student-level longitudinal data on mathematics course-taking across successive cohorts of SFUSD students who spanned the reform’s implementation. We observe large changes in ninth and 10th grades (e.g., delaying Algebra I and geometry). Participation in Advanced Placement (AP) math initially fell 15% (6 percentage points), driven by declines in AP calculus and among Asian/Pacific Islander students. However, growing participation in acceleration options attenuated these reductions. Large ethnoracial gaps in advanced math course-taking remained.

Keywords

ability grouping curriculum descriptive analysis educational policy longitudinal studies mathematics education policy analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

African American Parent Advisory Council. (2015). Letter to SF Board of Education. https://rpnorton.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/aapac-math-sequence-letter.pdf

Altonji

J. G.

(1995). The effects of high school curriculum on education and labor market outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/146029

Antonovics

Black

S. E.

Cullen

J. B.

Meiselman

A. Y.

(2022). Patterns, determinants, and consequences of ability tracking: Evidence from Texas public schools (Working Paper No. 30370). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30370

Ballis

Heath

(2021). The long-run impacts of special education. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(4), 72–111. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190603

Boaler

Schoenfeld

(2018, October 29). New math pays dividends in SF schools. San Francisco Chronicle. https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/New-match-shows-dividends-in-SF-schools-13342017.php

Boaler

Schoenfeld

Daro

Asturias

Callahan

Foster

(2018, October 9). OPINION: How one city got math right. The Hechinger Report. http://hechingerreport.org/opinion-how-one-city-got-math-right/

Bracco

K. R.

Barrat

Finkelstein

(2020). Student progress under California State University’s Executive Order 1110: A systemwide analysis of outcomes in 2018/19. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED613408

Bressoud

D. M.

(2021). The strange role of calculus in the United States. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(3), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01188-0

Burdman

Anderson

(2022). Calculating the odds: Counselor views on math coursetaking and college admissions. Just Equations & National Association for College Admission Counseling. https://justequations.org/resource/calculating-the-odds-counselor-views-on-math-coursetaking-and-college-admissions

10.

California Department of Education. (2015). Appendix D: Course placement and sequences of the mathematics framework for California Public Schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve.

11.

California Department of Education. (2019). Staff assignment and course data [Data set]. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/filesassign.asp

12.

Card

Giuliano

(2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13678–13683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605043113

13.

Carranza

(2015). Remarks to board. SFUSD Mathematics. https://www.sfusdmath.org/richard-carranzas-remarks-to-board.html

14.

Christopher

(2016). Why Did San Francisco schools stop teaching algebra in middle school? Priceonomics. https://priceonomics.com/why-did-san-francisco-schools-stop-teaching/

15.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Clifton

C. R.

Turaeva

M. R.

(2021). School segregation at the classroom level in a southern ‘new destination’ state. Race and Social Problems, 13(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-020-09309-w

16.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2015). The aftermath of accelerating algebra: Evidence from district policy initiatives. Journal of Human Resources, 50(1), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.1.159

17.

Cohodes

S. R.

(2020). The long-run impacts of specialized programming for high-achieving students. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(1), 127–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20180315

18.

Collins

C. A.

Gan

(2013). Does sorting students improve scores? An analysis of class composition (Working Paper No. 18848). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18848

19.

Conger

Long

M. C.

Iatarola

(2009). Explaining race, poverty, and gender disparities in advanced course-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(4), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20455

20.

Cortes

K. E.

Goodman

J. S.

(2014). Ability-tracking, instructional time, and better pedagogy: The effect of double-dose algebra on student achievement. American Economic Review, 104(5), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.400

21.

Domina

Hanselman

Hwang

McEachin

(2016). Detracking and tracking up: Mathematics course placements in California middle schools, 2003–2013. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1229–1266. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216650405

22.

Domina

McEachin

Hanselman

Agarwal

Hwang

Lewis

R. W.

(2019). Beyond tracking and detracking: The dimensions of organizational differentiation in schools. Sociology of Education, 92(3), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719851879

23.

Domina

McEachin

Penner

(2015). Aiming high and falling short: California’s eighth-grade Algebra-for-All effort. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714543685

24.

Domina

Penner

A. M.

Penner

E. K.

Conley

(2014). Algebra for All: California’s eighth-grade algebra initiative as constrained curricula. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1–32.

25.

Dougherty

S. M.

Goodman

J. S.

Hill

D. V.

Litke

E. G.

Page

L. C.

(2015). Middle school math acceleration and equitable access to eighth-grade algebra: Evidence from the Wake County Public School System. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(Suppl. 1), 80S–101S. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715576076

26.

Dougherty

S. M.

Goodman

J. S.

Hill

D. V.

Litke

E. G.

Page

L. C.

(2017). Objective course placement and college readiness: Evidence from targeted middle school math acceleration. Economics of Education Review, 58, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.04.002

27.

Dudnick

(2024, February 14). SFUSD to offer Algebra 1 in 8th grade beginning in 2024-25 school year [Press Release]. https://sfusd.bmeurl.co/10BB395C

28.

Duflo

(2001). Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 795–813.

29.

Evers

W. M.

Wurman

(2022). COMMENTARY: California’s math framework lacks sound research evidence to justify its progressive agenda. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2022/californias-math-framework-lacks-research-to-justify-its-progressive-agenda/670470

30.

Fensterwald

(2022). Deep divisions, further delay for California’s math guidelines. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2022/deep-divisions-further-delay-for-californias-math-guidelines/675881

31.

Figlio

D. N.

Page

M. E.

(2002). School choice and the distributional effects of ability tracking: Does separation increase inequality? Journal of Urban Economics, 51(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2001.2255

32.

Ford

(2022). COMMENTARY: Proposed mathematics pathways for California high school students raise equity concerns. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2022/proposed-mathematics-pathways-for-california-high-school-students-raise-equity-concerns/674400

33.

Fortin

(2021, November 4). California tries to close the gap in math, but sets off a backlash. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/california-math-curriculum-guidelines.html

34.

Mehta

(2018). Ability tracking, school and parental effort, and student achievement: A structural model and estimation. Journal of Labor Economics, 36(4), 923–979. https://doi.org/10.1086/697559

35.

Gamoran

(1989). Measuring curriculum differentiation. American Journal of Education, 97(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1086/443918

36.

Gamoran

Hannigan

E. C.

(2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737022003241

37.

Goodman

(2019). The labor of division: Returns to compulsory high school math coursework. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(4), 1141–1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/703135

38.

Grissom

J. A.

Redding

(2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175

39.

Han

S. W.

Kang

Weis

Dominguez

(2023). On track or off track? Identifying a typology of math course-taking sequences in U.S. high schools. Socius, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231169259

40.

Hanushek

E. A.

Wößmann

(2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C63–C76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x

41.

Hong

(2021). Understanding the debate behind California’s new math framework. CalMatters. http://calmatters.org/education/k-12-education/2021/11/california-math/

42.

Irizarry

(2021). On track or derailed? Race, advanced math, and the transition to high school. Socius, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120980293

43.

Jones

(2022). Despite divisions, math framework must be a ‘North Star,’ experts say. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2022/despite-divisions-math-framework-must-be-a-north-star-experts-say/675992

44.

Kalogrides

Loeb

(2013). Different teachers, different peers: The magnitude of student sorting within schools. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13495087

45.

Kariya

Rosenbaum

J. E.

(1999). Bright flight: Unintended consequences of detracking policy in Japan. American Journal of Education, 107(3), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/444216

46.

Lafortune

(2018). Essays on the distribution and effectiveness of educational resources. UC Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8qh075sj

47.

Lee

V. E.

(1993). Educational choice: The stratifying effects of selecting schools and courses. Educational Policy, 7(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904893007002001

48.

Legette

K. B.

Kurtz-Costes

(2021). Curricular Tracking, Students’ Academic Identity, and School Belonging. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(7), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243162097765

49.

Loeb

Dynarski

McFarland

Morris

Reardon

Reber

(2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A Guide for researchers. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED573325

50.

Long

M. C.

Conger

Iatarola

(2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and postsecondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 285–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211431952

51.

Loveless

(2021). Does detracking promote educational equity? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2021/10/04/does-detracking-promote-educational-equity/

52.

Loveless

(2022, March 29). San Francisco’s detracking experiment. Education Next. https://www.educationnext.org/san-franciscos-detracking-experiment/

53.

McEachin

Domina

Penner

(2020). Heterogeneous effects of early algebra across California middle schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(3), 772–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22202

54.

(2021). COMMENTARY: One district’s faulty data shouldn’t drive California’s math policy. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2021/one-districts-faulty-data-shouldnt-drive-californias-math-policy/663374

55.

Moses

R. P.

Cobb

Jr. (2001). Organizing algebra: The need to voice a demand. Social Policy, 31(4), 4–12.

56.

Oakes

(2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.

57.

Oakes

Ormseth

Bell

R. M.

Camp

(1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R3928.html

58.

Randazzo

(2024, February 4). In the battle over early algebra, parents are winning. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/education/in-the-battle-over-early-algebra-parents-are-winning-9f52ea5f

59.

Reardon

S. F.

(2019). Educational opportunity in early and middle childhood: Using full population administrative data to study variation by place and age. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Science, 5(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2019.5.2.03

60.

Regents of the University of California. (2018). University of California A-G course list. https://hs-articulation.ucop.edu/agcourselist

61.

Rosin

M. S.

Barondess

Leichty

(2009). Algebra policy in California: Great expectations and serious challenges. EdSource. https://edsource.org/wp-content/publications/pub_algebra_es_final.pdf

62.

Rui

(2009). Four decades of research on the effects of detracking reform: Where do we stand?—A systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2(3), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01032.x

63.

San Francisco Unified School District. (2014a). From middle school to high school: Mathematics course sequence for the CCSS-M. http://www.sfusdmath.org/uploads/2/4/0/9/24098802/sfusd_course_sequence_recommendation.pdf

64.

San Francisco Unified School District. (2014b). Regular meeting of the board agenda. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FvPtl38BhK0ExtVoAQcZ3vTYT4gumAwR

65.

Sawchuk

(2018, June 13). A bold effort to end algebra tracking shows promise. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/a-bold-effort-to-end-algebra-tracking-shows-promise/2018/06

66.

Schwartz

(2022, September 7). Why elite college admissions may play an outsized role in K-12 math programs. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/why-elite-college-admissions-may-play-an-outsized-role-in-k-12-math-programs/2022/09

67.

Stein

M. K.

Kaufman

J. H.

Sherman

Hillen

A. F.

(2011). Algebra: A challenge at the crossroads of policy and practice. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 453–492. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423025

68.

Tintocalis

(2015, July 22). San Francisco Middle Schools no longer teaching “Algebra 1.” KQED. https://www.kqed.org/news/10610214/san-francisco-middle-schools-no-longer-teaching-algebra-1

69.

Tucker

(2019, January 9). SF schools’ move to delay algebra shows positive results, district says. San Francisco Chronicle. https://www.sfchronicle.com/education/article/SF-schools-move-to-delay-algebra-shows-13518860.php

70.

Tucker

(2023, September 25). Math wars: S.F. supervisor wants voters to lean on school district about timing of algebra. San Francisco Chronicle. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/sf-algebra-18380914.php

71.

Wells

A. S.

Serna

(2010). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.274848214743t373

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.46 MB

Ahead of the Game? Course-Taking Patterns Under a Math Pathways Reform

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material