Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

How much do teachers value compensation deferred for retirement (CDR)? This question is important because the vast majority of public school teachers are covered by defined benefit pension plans that “backload” a large share of compensation to retirement relative to the compensation structure in the private sector, and there is scant evidence about whether pension structures are consistent with teacher preferences for current compensation versus CDR. This study examines a unique setting in Washington State, where teachers are enrolled in a hybrid pension system that has both defined benefit and defined contribution components. We exploit the fact that teachers have choices over their defined contribution rate to infer their revealed preferences for current versus CDR. We find that teachers on average contribute 7.23% of salary income toward retirement; 62% in fact elect to contribute more than the minimally required contribution of 5%. This suggests that teachers value CDR far more than suggested by prior evidence.

Keywords

descriptive analysis educational policy policy statistics teacher research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldeman

(2016, May 13). The Pension Pac-Man: How pension debt eats away at teacher salaries. Bellwether Education Partners. https://bellwethereducation.org/publication/pension-pac-man-how-pension-debt-eats-away-teacher-salaries#:~:text=In%20our%20new%20report%2C%20%E2%80%9CThe,could%20be%20spent%20on%20salaries

Aldeman

(2020, November 12). Default settings: How Ohio can nudge teachers toward a more secure retirement. Bellwether Education Partners. https://bellwethereducation.org/publication/default-settings-how-ohio-can-nudge-teachers-toward-secure-retirement

Aldeman

Robson

(2017, May 16). Why most teachers get a bad deal on pensions. Education Next. https://www.educationnext.org/why-most-teachers-get-bad-deal-pensions-state-plans-winners-losers/#:~:text=Teachers%20generally%20accept%20lower%20base,goes%20toward%20teacher%20retirement%20benefits

Attanasio

O. P.

Rohwedder

(2003). Pension wealth and household saving: Evidence from pension reforms in the United Kingdom. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655419

Bernheim

B. D.

(2002). Taxation and saving. In Auerbach

A. J

Feldstein

(Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1173–1249). Elsevier.

Biggs

A. G.

(2015). The State of Public Pension Funding: Are government employee plans back on track? AEI Economic Perspectives. American Enterprise Institute.

Boivie

Weller

C. E.

(2012). The fiscal crisis, public pensions, and labor and employment relations. In Mitchell

(Ed.), Public jobs and political agendas: the public sector in an era of economic stress (pp. 167–194). Labor and Employment Relations Association.

Brown

J. R.

Weisbenner

S. J.

(2014). Why do individuals choose defined contribution plans? Evidence from participants in a large public plan. Journal of Public Economics, 116, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.05.004

Brown

K. M.

(2013). The link between pensions and retirement behavior: Lessons from California teachers. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.007

10.

Chan

Stevens

A. H.

(2008). What you don’t know can’t help you: Pension knowledge and retirement decision-making. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.2.253

11.

Clingman

Burkhalter

Chaplain

(2016). Replacement rates for hypothetical retired workers (Actuarial Note No. 2016.9). Office of the Chief Actuary. Social Security Administration.

12.

Costrell

R. M.

(2020, July 20). School pension costs have doubled over the last decade, now top $1,000 per pupil nationally. Teacherpensions.org .

13.

Costrell

R. M.

McGee

J. B.

(2010). Teacher pension incentives, retirement behavior, and potential for reform in Arkansas. Education, 5(4), 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00013

14.

Costrell

R. M.

Podgursky

(2009). Peaks, cliffs, and valleys: The peculiar incentives in teacher retirement systems and their consequences for school staffing. Education, 4(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.2.175

15.

Fitzpatrick

M. D.

(2015). How much are public school teachers willing to pay for their retirement benefits? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140087

16.

Fornia

Rhee

(2014). Still a better bang for the buck: An update on the economic efficiencies of defined benefit pensions. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2785732

17.

Fuchsman

McGee

J. B.

Zamarro

(2020). Teachers’ willingness to pay for retirement benefits: A national stated preferences experiment (Working Paper No. 20–313). https://doi.org/10.26300/m3b7-nn67

18.

Glaeser

E. L.

Ponzetto

G. A.

(2014). Shrouded costs of government: The political economy of state and local public pensions. Journal of Public Economics, 116, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.03.005

19.

Goda

G. S.

Manchester

C. F.

(2013). Incorporating employee heterogeneity into default rules for retirement plan selection. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 198–235. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2013.0000

20.

Goldhaber

Grout

(2016a). Pension choices and the savings patterns of public school teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 11(4), 449–481. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00208

21.

Goldhaber

Grout

(2016b). Which plan to choose? The determinants of pension system choice for public school teachers. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 15(1), 30–54.

22.

Goldhaber

Grout

Holden

K. L.

Brown

(2015). Crossing the border? Exploring the cross-state mobility of the teacher workforce. Educational Researcher, 44(8), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15613981

23.

Goldhaber

Grout

Holden

K. L.

(2017). Pension structure and employee turnover: Evidence from a large public pension system. ILR Review, 70(4), 976–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916678424

24.

Gustman

A. L.

Mitchell

O. S.

Steinmeier

T. L.

(1995). Retirement measures in the health and retirement study. Journal of Human Resources, 30, S57–S83. https://doi.org/10.2307/146278

25.

Holden

VanDerhei

J. L.

(2001). Contribution behavior of 401 (k) plan participants. Employee Benefit Research Institute.

26.

Huberman

Iyengar

S. S.

Jiang

(2007). Defined contribution pension plans: determinants of participation and contributions rates. Journal of Financial Services Research, 31(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-007-0003-6

27.

Ippolito

R. A.

(2002). Stayers as” workers” and” savers”: toward reconciling the pension-quit literature. Journal of Human Resources, 37(2), 275–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069648

28.

Johnson

R. W.

Butrica

B. A.

Haaga

Southgate

B. G.

(2014). How long must state and local employees work to accumulate pension benefits? Urban Institute. http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/22571/413107-How-Long-Must-State-and-Local-Employees-Work-to-Accumulate-Pension-Benefits-.PDF

29.

Johnston

A. C.

(2020). Teacher preferences, working conditions, and compensation structure. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532779

30.

Keller

Siegrist

(2006). Investing in stocks: The influence of financial risk attitude and values-related money and stock market attitudes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.07.002

31.

Knoll

M. A.

Tamborini

C. R.

Whitman

(2012). I do . . . want to save: Marriage and retirement savings in young households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00877.x

32.

Koedel

Podgursky

Shi

(2013). Teacher pension systems, the composition of the teaching workforce, and teacher quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21699

33.

Koedel

Xiang

B. P.

(2017). Pension enhancements and the retention of public employees. ILR Review, 70(2), 519–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916650452

34.

Laibson

(1998). Life-cycle consumption and hyperbolic discount functions. European Economic Review, 42(3), 861–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00132-3

35.

Laibson

D. I.

Repetto

Tobacman

Hall

R. E.

Gale

W. G.

Akerlof

G. A.

(1998). Self-control and saving for retirement. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1998(1), 91–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534671

36.

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037

37.

Lankford

Wyckoff

(1997). The changing structure of teacher compensation, 1970–1994. Economics of Education Review, 16(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00066-0

38.

Lazear

E. P.

(1979). Why is there mandatory retirement? Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1261–1284. https://doi.org/10.1086/260835

39.

Lazear

E. P.

Moore

R. L.

(1984). Incentives, productivity, and labor contracts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885526

40.

Lehmann-Hasemeyer

Streb

(2018). Does social security crowd out private savings? The Case of Bismarck’s system of social insurance. European Review of Economic History, 22(3), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/hex022

41.

Madrian

B. C.

Shea

D. F.

(2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401 (k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543

42.

Monk

D. H.

Jacobson

S. L.

(1985). The distribution of salary increments between veteran and novice teachers: Evidence from New York State. Journal of Education Finance, 11(2), 157–175.

43.

Munnell

A. H.

Aubry

J. P.

Hurwitz

Quinby

(2011). A role for defined contribution plans in the public sector (Issue Brief No. 11). Center for Retirement Research. https://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/slp_16.pdf

44.

Munnell

A. H.

Hou

Sanzenbacher

G. T.

(2017). The impact of raising children on retirement security (Issue Brief No. 17–16). Center for Retirement Research. https://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/IB_17-16.pdf

45.

Munnell

A. H.

Sundén

Soto

Taylor

(2002). How will the rise in 401 (K) plans affect bequests (Issue Brief No. 10). Center for Retirement Research. https://crr.bc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2002/11/ib_10-508.pdf

46.

National Education Association. (2010). Characteristics of large public education pension plans (p. 182).

47.

Podgursky

(2016). How teachers respond to pension system incentives: New estimates and policy applications. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(4), 1075–1104. https://doi.org/10.1086/686263

48.

Podgursky

Wang

(2020). How teachers value pension wealth: A reexamination of the Illinois experience (Working Paper No. 20–07). https://economics.missouri.edu/sites/default/files/wp-files/ni-podgursky-wang-a.pdf

49.

Novy-Marx

Rauh

(2011). Public pension promises: How big are they and what are they worth? Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1211–1249.

50.

Pew Charitable Trusts. (2019). The state pension funding gap: 2018. https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2020/06/statepensionfundinggap2018.pdf

51.

Poterba

Rauh

Venti

Wise

(2007). Defined contribution plans, defined benefit plans, and the accumulation of retirement wealth. Journal of Public Economics, 91(10), 2062–2086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.08.004

52.

Ronfeldt

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813

53.

Wärneryd

K. E.

(1996). Risk attitudes and risky behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(6), 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(96)00034-7

54.

Yoo

K. Y.

De Serres

(2004). Tax treatment of private pension savings in OECD countries and the net tax cost per unit of contribution to tax-favoured schemes. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.607185. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=607185

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.19 MB

How Much Do Teachers Value Compensation Deferred for Retirement? Evidence From Defined Contribution Rate Choices

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material