Does the School Context Really Matter for Teacher Burnout? Review of Existing Multilevel Teacher Burnout Research and Results From the Teaching and Learning International Survey 2018 in the Flemish- and French-Speaking Communities of Belgium

Abstract

It is widely believed that the school context plays a crucial role in teacher burnout. Against that background, we (1) critically review existing empirical multilevel studies on teacher burnout and (2) use data from the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 to assess the school-level variance and its correlates in emotional exhaustion, cynical depersonalization, and personal accomplishment in 2,300 primary (183 schools) and 2,700 lower secondary (190 schools) teachers in the Flemish-speaking community of Belgium, and 2,135 lower secondary (120 schools) teachers in the French-speaking community of Belgium. Our results reveal that (1) conceptual confusion exists surrounding school-context variables and (2) the between-school variance in teacher burnout is small. Implications for educational policy and teacher burnout research are discussed.

Keywords

emotional exhaustion hierarchical linear modeling school context survey research teacher burnout

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agirdag

Van Houtte

(2011). A tale of two cities: Bridging families and schools. Educational Leadership, 68(8), 42–46.

Ainley

Carstens

(2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework (OECD Education Working Papers No. 187). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en

Ainsworth

Oldfield

(2019). Quantifying teacher resilience: Context matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.012

Alarcon

G. M.

(2011). A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.007

Alker

H. R.

Jr. (1969). A typology of ecological fallacies. In Dogan

Rokkan

(Eds.), Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences (pp. 69–86). MIT Press.

Bakker

A. B.

Demerouti

(2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.

Byrne

B. M.

(1994). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003645

Cano-García

F. J.

Padilla-Muñoz

E. M.

Carrasco-Ortiz

M. A.

(2005). Personality and contextual variables in teacher burnout. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(4), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.018

10.

Chan

(1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234

11.

Chang

M.-L.

(2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y

12.

Conley

You

(2018). School organizational factors relating to teachers’ intentions to leave: A mediator model. Current Psychology, 40, 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9953-0

13.

*Ford

T. G.

Olsen

Khojasteh

Ware

Urick

. (2019). The effects of leader support for teacher psychological needs on teacher burnout, commitment, and intent to leave. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(6), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0185

14.

*González-Morales

M. G.

Peiró

J. M.

Rodríguez

Bliese

P. D

. (2011). Perceived collective burnout: A multilevel explanation of burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 25(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.542808

15.

Greenglass

E. R.

Burke

R. J.

Konarski

(1997). The impact of social support on the development of burnout in teachers: Examination of a model. Work & Stress, 11(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379708256840

16.

Hobfoll

S. E.

(1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

17.

Horn

J. E.

Schaufeli

W. B.

(1998). Maslach Burnout Inventory: The Dutch Educators Survey (MBI-NL-ES) psychometric evaluations. Manual [Unpublished manuscript]. Utrecht University.

18.

Hox

J. J.

Moerbeek

Schoot

R. van de

. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982

19.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

20.

Hyman

H. H.

Singer

(1968). Readings in reference group theory and research. Free Press.

21.

Jacobs

Rea

Teney

Callier

Lothaire

(2009). De sociale lift blijft steken de prestaties van allochtone leerlingen in de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en de Franse Gemeenschap. [The social lift stops working. The performance of immigrant pupils in the Flemish community and the French community]. Koning Boudewijnstichting.

22.

*Kim

Youngs

& Frank

(2017). Burnout contagion: Is it due to early career teachers’ social networks or organizational exposure? Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.017

23.

*Klusmann

Kunter

Trautwein

Lüdtke

& Baumert

(2008). Engagement and emotional exhaustion in teachers: Does the school context make a difference? Applied Psychology, 57(s1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00358.x

24.

Lai

M. H. C.

Kwok

(2015). Examining the rule of thumb of not using multilevel modeling: The “design effect smaller than two” rule. Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.907229

25.

Langballe

E. M.

(2006). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory: General survey in representative samples of eight different occupational groups. Journal of Career Assessment, 14(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706286497

26.

Lazarus

R. S.

Folkman

(1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304

27.

Lee

R. T.

Ashforth

B. E.

(1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.123

28.

*Lim

& Eo

(2014). The mediating roles of collective teacher efficacy in the relations of teachers’ perceptions of school organizational climate to their burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.007

29.

Lorah

(2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0061-2

30.

Maas

C. J. M.

Hox

J. J.

(2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86

31.

Marsh

H. W.

Trautwein

Lüdtke

Köller

(2008). Social comparison and big-fish-little-pond effects on self-concept and other self-belief constructs: Role of generalized and specific others. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.510

32.

Maslach

Jackson

S. E.

(1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory (2nd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press.

33.

Maslach

Leiter

M. P.

(1999). Teacher burnout: A research agenda. In Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 295–303). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527784.021

34.

Maslach

Schaufeli

W. B.

Leiter

M. P.

(2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

35.

*McCarthy

C. J.

Lambert

R. G.

O’Donnell

Melendres

L. T

. (2009). The relation of elementary teachers’ experience, stress, and coping resources to burnout symptoms. Elementary School Journal, 109(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/592308

36.

*McCormick

Barnett

. (2011). Teachers’ attributions for stress and their relationships with burnout. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(3), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111120114

37.

Merlo

Wagner

Austin

P. C.

Subramanian

Leckie

(2018). General and specific contextual effects in multilevel regression analyses and their paradoxical relationship: A conceptual tutorial. SSM - Population Health, 5, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.05.006

38.

Musca

S. C.

Kamiejski

Nugier

Méot

Er-Rafiy

Brauer

(2011). Data with hierarchical structure: Impact of intraclass correlation and sample size on type-I error. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00074

39.

*O’Brennan

Pas

Bradshaw

. (2017). Multilevel examination of burnout among high school staff: Importance of staff and school factors. School Psychology Review, 46(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2015-0019.V46-2

40.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 technical report. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf

41.

Parrello

Ambrosetti

Iorio

Castelli

(2019). School burnout, relational, and organizational factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01695

42.

*Pas

E. T.

Bradshaw

C. P.

& Hershfeldt

P. A.

(2012). Teacher- and school-level predictors of teacher efficacy and burnout: Identifying potential areas for support. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.003

43.

Pietarinen

Pyhältö

Soini

Salmela-Aro

(2013). Reducing teacher burnout: A socio-contextual approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.003

44.

*Ross

S. W.

Romer

Horner

R. H

. (2012). Teacher well-being and the implementation of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711413820

45.

Sampson

R. J.

Groves

W. B.

(1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068

46.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Bakker

A. B.

Hoogduin

Schaap

Kladler

(2001). On the clinical validity of the maslach burnout inventory and the burnout measure. Psychology & Health, 16(5), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405527

47.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Daamen

Van Mierlo

(1994). Burnout among Dutch teachers: An Mbi-validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 803–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003027

48.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Enzmann

(1998). The burnout companion to study and practice: A critical analysis. Taylor & Francis.

49.

*Shackleton

Bonell

Jamal

Allen

Mathiot

Elbourne

Viner

. (2019). Teacher burnout and contextual and compositional elements of school environment. Journal of School Health, 89(12), 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12839

50.

Skaalvik

E. M.

Skaalvik

(2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.006

51.

Skaalvik

E. M.

Skaalvik

(2017). Still motivated to teach? A study of school context variables, stress and job satisfaction among teachers in senior high school. Social Psychology of Education, 20(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9363-9

52.

Statacorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16.

53.

Steinhardt

M. A.

Jaggars

S. E. S.

Faulk

K. E.

Gloria

C. T.

(2011). Chronic work stress and depressive symptoms: Assessing the mediating role of teacher burnout. Stress Health, 27(5), 420–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1394

54.

Subramanian

S. V.

Jones

Kaddour

Krieger

(2009). Revisiting Robinson: The perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(2), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn359

55.

*Ullrich

Lambert

R. G.

McCarthy

C. J

. (2012). Relationship of German elementary teachers’ occupational experience, stress, and coping resources to burnout symptoms. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(4), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030121

56.

Vandenberghe

Huberman

A. M.

(1999). Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527784

57.

Van Droogenbroeck

Spruyt

Vanroelen

. (2014). Burnout among senior teachers: Investigating the role of workload and interpersonal relationships at work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.005

58.

*Van Maele

Van Houtte

. (2015). Trust in school: A pathway to inhibit teacher burnout? Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2014-0018

59.

Vercambre

M.-N.

Brosselin

Gilbert

Nerrière

Kovess-Masféty

(2009). Individual and contextual covariates of burnout: A cross-sectional nationwide study of French teachers. BMC Public Health, 9(1), Article 333. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-333

60.

*Zheng

Chen

Loeb

. (2017). What aspects of principal leadership are most highly correlated with school outcomes in China? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 409–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17706152

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.14 MB