Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Empirically rigorous research on teacher education entry is extremely limited. Evidence on who enters teacher education and why is crucial for identifying undesired gaps in entry and can assist with teacher recruitment. Grounded in prior research, we identified four primary groups of relevant individual-level variables: student/family background, achievement/abilities, personality, and motivation. We empirically tested this conceptual model using rich data from a national cohort of German ninth-graders followed to college/university and their parents. Our study is the first to predict eventual teacher education entry early in secondary school. Although those students who eventually entered teacher education were significantly different from their counterparts across most variables, fewer were conditionally predictive. Social interests, desired working conditions, desire to have children, and students’ parents were particularly influential. Implications for research and teacher recruitment are discussed.

Keywords

international education/studies parents and families teacher characteristics teacher education/development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayaita

Stürmer

(2019). Risk aversion and the teaching profession: An analysis including different forms of risk aversion, different control groups, selection and socialization effects. Education Economics, 28(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2019.1675592

Bacolod

(2007a). Do alternative opportunities matter? The role of female labor markets in the decline of teacher quality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 737–751. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.4.737

Bacolod

(2007b). Who teaches and where they choose to teach: College graduates of the 1990s. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707305586

Blossfeld

H.-P.

Roßbach

H.-G.

(Eds.). (2019). Education as a lifelong process: The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (2nd ed.). Springer VS.

Boyd

Grossman

P. L.

Hammerness

Lankford

Loeb

Ronfeldt

Wyckoff

(2012). Recruiting effective math teachers: Evidence from New York City. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1008–1047. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211434579

Corcoran

S. P.

Evans

W. N.

Schwab

R. M.

(2004). Women, the labor market, and the declining relative quality of teachers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20021

Fray

Gore

(2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.009

Goldhaber

Walch

(2014). Gains in teacher quality: Academic capabilities of the US teaching force are on the rise. Education Next, 143(1), 38–46.

Han

S. W.

(2018). Who expects to become a teacher? The role of educational accountability policies in international perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.012

10.

Han

S. W.

Borgonovi

Guerriero

(2018). What motivates high school students to want to be teachers? The role of salary, working conditions, and societal evaluations about occupations in a comparative perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217729875

11.

Hanushek

E. A.

Pace

R. R.

(1995). Who chooses to teach (and why)? Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(95)90392-l

12.

Henry

G. T.

Bastian

K. C.

Smith

A. A.

(2012). Scholarships to recruit the “best and brightest” into teaching: Who is recruited, where do they teach, how effective are they, and how long do they stay? Educational Researcher, 41(3), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12437202

13.

Lankford

Loeb

McEachin

Miller

L. C.

Wyckoff

(2014). Who enters teaching? Encouraging evidence that the status of teaching is improving. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x14563600

14.

Patnaik

Wiswall

M. J.

Zafar

(2020). College majors (NBER Working Paper No. 27645). http://www.nber.org/papers/w27645

15.

Rockoff

J. E.

Jacob

B. A.

Kane

T. J.

Staiger

D. O.

(2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00022

16.

Roloff

Klusmann

Lüdtke

Trautwein

(2020). The predictive validity of teachers’ personality, cognitive and academic abilities at the end of high school on instructional quality in Germany: A longitudinal study. AERA Open, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419897884

17.

Roloff Henoch

Klusmann

Lüdtke

Trautwein

. (2015). Who becomes a teacher? Challenging the “negative selection” hypothesis. Learning and Instruction, 36, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.005

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB