Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Understanding how children’s broader context influences their development is critical if we are to develop policies that help them flourish. Combining sociological, economic, and psychological literature, we argue that ability stratification—the degree to which children of similar levels of ability are schooled together—influences a child’s academic self-concept. This is because countries with more ability stratification should have larger Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effects (the negative effect of school average achievement on academic self-concept). We used four cycles of the Trends in International Math and Science Study to test the hypothesis that more country-level ability stratification is associated with larger country-level Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effects for math self-concept. Findings strongly support this hypothesis. Our findings have implications for school system design and policy.

Keywords

ability grouping educational policy hierarchical linear modeling interdisciplinary approach international comparison meta-analysis motivation school psychology self-concept social stratification structural equation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alicke

M. D.

Zell

Bloom

D. L.

(2010). Mere categorization and the frog-pond effect. Psychological Science, 21(2), 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357718

Buchmann

Park

(2009). Stratification and the formation of expectations in highly differentiated educational systems. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 27(4), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2009.10.003

Bürkner

P.-C.

Vuorre

(2019). Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199

Chmielewski

A. K.

(2014). An international comparison of achievement inequality in within- and between-school tracking systems. American Journal of Education, 120(3), 293–324. https://doi.org/10.1086/675529

Dicke

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

P. D.

Pekrun

Guo

Televantou

(2018). Effects of school-average achievement on individual self-concept and achievement: Unmasking phantom effects masquerading as true compositional effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1112–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000259

Elsner

Isphording

I. E.

(2017). A big fish in a small pond: Ability rank and human capital investment. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(3), 787–828. https://doi.org/10.1086/690714

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Foy

Yin

(2016). Scaling the TIMSS 2015 achievement data. In Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Hooper

(Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 13.1–13.62). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timss.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-13.html

Goldthorpe

J. H.

(2007). On sociology. Stanford University Press.

10.

Kamens

D. H.

Benavot

(2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: Trends among developing countries, 1960–2009. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.577337

11.

LaRoche

Joncas

Foy

(2015). Sample design in TIMSS 2015. In Martin

M. O.

Mullis

I. V. S.

Hooper

(Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 3.1–3.38. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-3.html

12.

Lubienski

(2005). Public schools in marketized environments: shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111(4), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1086/431180

13.

Marsh

H. W.

(2006). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. British Psychological Society.

14.

Marsh

H. W.

Abduljabbar

A. S.

Morin

A. J.

Parker

Abdelfattah

Nagengast

Abu-Hilal

M. M.

(2015). The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Generalizability of social comparison processes over two age cohorts from Western, Asian, and Middle Eastern Islamic countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037485

15.

Marsh

H. W.

Hau

K. T.

(2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364

16.

Marsh

H. W.

Köller

(2004). Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German school systems after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00034-1

17.

Marsh

H. W.

Kong

C. K.

Hau

K. T.

(2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337

18.

Marsh

H. W.

Kuyper

Morin

A. J. S.

Parker

P. D.

Seaton

(2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications. Learning and Instruction, 33, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.002

19.

Marsh

H. W.

Parker

J. W.

(1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213

20.

Micklewright

Schnepf

(2007). Inequalities in industrialised countries. In Jenkins

S. P.

Micklewright

(Eds). Inequality and poverty re-examined (pp. 129–145). Oxford University Press.

21.

Murphy

Weinhardt

(2014). Top of the class: The importance of ordinal rank (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4815). CESifo. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_4815.html

22.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

23.

Parker

P. D.

Jerrim

Schoon

Marsh

H. W.

(2016). A multination study of socioeconomic inequality in expectations for progression to higher education: The role of between-school tracking and ability stratification. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215621786

24.

Parker

P. D.

Marsh

H. W.

Ciarrochi

Marshall

Abduljabbar

A. S.

(2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.797339

25.

Parker

P. D.

Marsh

H. W.

Guo

Anders

Shure

Dicke

(2018). An information distortion model of social class differences in math self-concept, intrinsic value, and utility value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000215

26.

Parker

P. D.

Marsh

H. W.

Jerrim

J. P.

Guo

Dicke

(2018). Inequity and excellence in academic performance: Evidence from 27 countries. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 836–858. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218760213

27.

Richer

(1976). Reference-group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research. Sociology of Education, 49(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112394

28.

Salchegger

(2016). Selective school systems and academic self-concept: How explicit and implicit school-level tracking relate to the big-fish-little-pond effect across cultures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000063

29.

Zell

Alicke

M. D.

(2009). Contextual neglect, self-evaluation, and the frog-pond effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015453

30.

Zell

Alicke

M. D.

(2010). The local dominance effect in self-evaluation: Evidence and explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(4), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366144

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

Ability Stratification Predicts the Size of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material