Students with disabilities are disciplined at disproportionately high rates, despite federal laws designed to ensure disciplinary protection. We examine the association between disability and discipline using a novel approach, investigating whether behavior problems trigger special education referral, and if disciplinary outcomes change once students are enrolled. Using longitudinal data from an urban school district, we estimate lagged variance decomposition models that disaggregate the outcomes of special education services from the behavioral characteristics that prompt disciplinary responses. We find that (1) ongoing disruptive behavior leads to placement in special education and (2) receiving special education is associated with a reduced likelihood of punishment. Earlier identification is vital in order to treat, rather than punish, disruptive behavior.
AchillesG. M.McLaughlinM. J.CroningerR. G. (2007). Sociocultural correlates of disciplinary exclusion among students with emotional, behavioral, and learning disabilities in the SEELS national dataset. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266070150010401
2.
AnyonY.GregoryA.StoneS.FarrarJ.JensonJ. M.DowningB.GreerE.SimmonsJ. (2016). Restorative interventions and school discipline sanctions in a large urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1663–1697. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216675719
3.
BishopG. B.RosénL. A.MillerC. D.HendricksonJ. (1996). Evaluation of the Boy’s Town Motivation System in a US school setting. School Psychology International, 17(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034396172002
4.
Bowman-PerrottL.BenzM. R.HsuH.-Y.KwokO.EisterholdL. A.ZhangD. (2013). Patterns and predictors of disciplinary exclusion over time: An analysis of the SEELS national data set. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611407501
5.
CamachoK. A.KrezmienM. P. (2019). Individual- and school-level factors contributing to disproportionate suspension rates: A multilevel analysis of one state. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(4), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426618769065
6.
ChristleC. A.JolivetteK.NelsonC. M. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality, 13(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1302_2
7.
Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. No. 20 (2015). USC.
8.
GageN. A.WhitfordD. K.KatsiyannisA. (2018). A review of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports as a framework for reducing disciplinary exclusions. Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918767847
9.
Government Accountability Office. (2018). K-12 Education: Discipline disparities for black students, boys, and students with disabilities (GAO-18-258). https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-258
10.
HarrisonJ. R.BunfordN.EvansS. W.OwensJ. S. (2013). Educational accommodations for students with behavioral challenges: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 551–597. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313497517
11.
HemphillS. A.ToumbourouJ. W.HerrenkohlT. I.McMorrisB. J. B.CatalanoR. F. (2006). The effect of school suspensions and arrests on subsequent adolescent antisocial behavior in Australia and the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(5), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.010
12.
HurwitzS.PerryB.CohenE. D.SkibaR. (2020). Special education and individualized academic growth: A longitudinal assessment of outcomes for students with disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 576–611. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219857054
13.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 20 USC Section 1400.
14.
KauffmanJ. M.MockD. R.SimpsonR. L. (2007). Problems related to underservice of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 33(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290703300104
15.
KrezmienM. P.CamachoK. (2018). Suspension and students with low incidence disabilities: Implications of trends over time. Empirische Sonderpädagogik, (2), 121–133.
16.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140040501
17.
KrezmienM. P.TraversJ. C.CamachoK. A. (2017). Suspension rates of students with autism or intellectual disabilities in Maryland from 2004 to 2015. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 61(11), 1011–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12406
18.
LewisT. J.McIntoshK.SimonsenB.MitchellB. S.HattonH. L. (2017). Schoolwide systems of positive behavior support: Implications for students at risk and with emotional/behavioral disorders. AERA Open, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417711428
19.
LosenD. J.GillespieJ. (2012). Opportunities suspended: The disparate impact of disciplinary exclusion from school. The Civil Rights Project.
MarchbanksM. P. I.BlakeJ. J.SmithD.SeibertA. L.CarmichaelD.BoothE. A.FabeloT. (2014). More than a drop in the bucket: The social and economic costs of dropouts and grade retentions associated with exclusionary discipline. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5(2), Article 17.
22.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(2), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv026
23.
NelsonJ. R.BennerG. J.LaneK.SmithB. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407100104
24.
PerryB. L.MorrisE. W. (2014). Suspending progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1067–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414556308
25.
RameyD. M. (2015). The social structure of criminalized and medicalized school discipline. Sociology of Educcation, 88(3), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715587114
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC.-G.RauschM. K.MayS. L.TobinT. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–107.
28.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release15.
29.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2008). What we know and need to know about preventing problem behavior in schools. Exceptionality, 16(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830801981138
30.
SullivanA. L.Van NormanE. R.KlingbeilD. A. (2014). Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519825
TheriotM. T.CraunS. W.DupperD. R. (2010). Multilevel evaluation of factors predicting school exclusion among middle and high school students. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2009.06.009
33.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (2019). Beyond suspensions: Examining school discipline policies and connections to the school-to-prison pipeline for students of color with disabilities.
WallaceJ. M.GoodkindS.WallaceC. M.BachmanJ. G. (2008). Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in school discipline among U.S. high school students: 1991-2005. Negro Educational Review, 59(1–2), 47–62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
