This article investigates trends in the relative wealth of the richest school districts in the United States between 2000 and 2015. For the purposes of discussion, I focus on the top 1% of districts. I argue that trends in school funding for the richest districts deserve greater attention from education researchers. Districts in the top 1% of the cost-adjusted, national school funding distribution are disproportionately suburban, affluent, and White. The relative wealth of these districts increased sharply (31.59%) between 2000 and 2015. Disaggregating these trends reveals large variation between states. Nevertheless, resource concentration in the top percentile of school districts increased in a large majority of states. These findings cannot be explained by efforts to provide additional educational resources to students with the greatest needs, and they suggest the ways in which the concentration of affluence accompanying growing economic inequality may be changing school funding.
AlexanderK.WallA. (2006). Adequate funding of education programs for at-risk children: An econometric application of research-based cost differentials. Journal of Education Finance, 31, 297–319.
2.
AlvaredoF.AtkinsonA.PikettyT.SaezE. (2013). The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 3–20.
3.
BakerB. D. (2005). The emerging shape of educational adequacy: From theoretical assumptions to empirical evidence. Journal of Education Finance, 30, 259–287.
4.
BakerB. (2018). Educational inequality and school finance: Why money matters for America’s students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
BakerB. D.SrikanthA.WeberM. A. (2016). School funding fairness data system (Rutgers Graduate School of Education/Education Law Center). Retrieved from http://www.schoolfundingfairness.org/data-download
7.
BerneR.StiefelL. (1984). The conceptualization and measurement of equity in school finance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
8.
BrighouseH.SwiftA. (2009). Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 26, 117–128.
9.
CandelariaC. A.ShoresK. A. (2019). Court-ordered finance reforms in the adequacy era: Heterogeneous causal effects and sensitivity. Education Finance and Policy, Advance online publication. doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00236
10.
CardD.PayneA. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 49–82.
11.
ChettyR.GruskyD.HellM.HendrenN.ManducaR.NarangJ. (2017). The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science, 356(6336), 398–406.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2013). Inequality and school resources: What it will take to close the opportunity gap. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 78–97). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. M. (2008). Measurement of cost differentials. In LaddH. F.FiskeE. (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 203–221). New York: Routledge.
14.
EvansW. N.SchwabR. M.WagnerK. L. (2018). The Great Recession and public education. Education Finance and Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00245
15.
GoldsteinA.HastingsO. P. (2019). Buying in: Positional competition, schools, income inequality, and housing consumption. Sociological Science, 6, 416–445.
16.
JacksonC. K.JohnsonR. C.PersicoC. P. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 157–218.
17.
KeisterL. A. (2014). The one percent. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 347–367.
18.
KeisterL. A.LessH. Y. (2014). The one percent: Top incomes and wealth in sociological research concentration. Social Currents, 1, 13–24.
19.
KornrichS. (2016). Inequalities in parental spending on young children: 1972 to 2010. AERA Open, 2, 1–12.
20.
KoskiW. S.ReichR. (2006). When “adequate” isn’t: The retreat from equity in educational law and policy and why it matters. Emory Law Review, 56, 545–617.
21.
LafortuneJ.RothsteinJ.SchanzenbachD. W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 1–26.
22.
LoebS.MorrisP.DynarskiS.ReardsS.McFarlandD.ReberS. (2017, March). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers (NCEE 2017–4023). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
23.
MurrayS. E.EvansW. N.SchwabR. M. (1998). Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review, 88, 789–812.
24.
NelsonA. A.GazleyB. (2014). The rise of school-supporting nonprofits. Education Finance and Policy, 9(4), 541–566.
25.
NelsonM. K. (2010). Parenting out of control: Anxious parents in uncertain times. New York: New York University Press.
26.
OwensA. (2018). Income segregation between school districts and inequality in students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 1–27.
27.
OwensA.ReardonS. F.JencksC. (2016). Income segregation between schools and school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1159–1197.
28.
PikettyT.SaezE. (2006). The evolution of top incomes: A historical and international perspective. American Economic Review, 96(2), 200–205.
29.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In LaddH. F.FiskeE. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 203–221). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
ReardonS. F.BischoffK. (2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 166(4), 1092–1153.
31.
ReschovskyA.ImazekiJ. (2001). Achieving educational adequacy through school finance reform. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 373–396.
32.
SaezE.ZucmanG. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 519–578.
33.
SugrueT. (2008). Sweet land of liberty: The forgotten struggle for civil rights in the North. New York: Random House.
34.
VerstegenD. A. (2013). Leaving equity behind? A quantitative analysis of fiscal equity in Nevada’s public education finance system. Journal of Education Finance, 39(2), 132–149.
35.
VerstegenD. A. (2015a). On doing an analysis of equity and closing the opportunity gap. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(41), 1–20.
VerstegenD. A.DriscollL. G. (2008). Educational opportunity: The Illinois dilemma. Journal of Education Finance, 33, 331–351.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
