Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As researchers continue to examine the growing number of charter schools in the United States, they have focused attention on the significant heterogeneity of charter effects on student achievement. Our article contributes to this agenda by examining the achievement effects of virtual charter schools vis-à-vis brick-and-mortar charters and traditional public schools and whether characteristics of teachers and classrooms explain the observed impacts. We found that students who switched to virtual charter schools experienced large, negative effects on mathematics and English/language arts achievement that persisted over time and that these effects could not be explained by observed teacher or classroom characteristics.

Keywords

achievement charter schools CMOs EMOs governance quasi-experimental methods/analysis school effects school/teacher effectiveness virtual schools

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Athey

Imbens

G. W.

Wooldridge

(2017). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? (NBER Working Paper No. 24003). National Bureau for Economic Research.

Abadie

Imbens

G. W.

(2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781–807.

Abdulkadiroglu

Angrist

J. D.

Dynarski

S. M.

Kane

T. J.

Pathak

P. A.

(2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699–748.

Ahn

McEachin

(2017). Student enrollment patterns and achievement in Ohio’s online charter schools. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 44–57.

Angrist

J. D.

Dynarski

Kane

T. J.

Pathak

P. A.

Walters

C. R.

(2012). Student achievement in charter schools. Who benefits from KIPP? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 837–860.

Angrist

J. D.

Pathak

P. A.

Walters

C. R.

(2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5, 1–27.

Ashenfelter

(1978). Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 47–57

Berends

(2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. American Review of Sociology, 41(1), 159–180.

Berends

(2020). Social perspectives on school choice. In Berends

Primus

Springer

M. G.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (2nd ed., pp. 32–45). Routledge.

10.

Berends

Waddington

R. J.

(2018). School choice in Indianapolis: Effects of charter, magnet, private, and traditional public schools. Education Finance and Policy, 13(2), 227–255.

11.

Berends

Waddington

R. J.

(2019). Scaling up and sustaining charter school effects. In Berends

Waddington

R. J.

Schoenig

J. A.

(Eds.), School choice at the crossroads: Research perspectives (pp. 148–170). Routledge.

12.

Betts

J. R.

Tang

Y. E.

(2019). The effects of charter schools on student achievement. In Berends

Waddington

R. J.

Schoenig

J. A.

(Eds.), School choice at the crossroads: Research perspectives (pp. 69–91). Routledge.

13.

Bifulco

(2012). Can nonexperimental estimates replicate estimates based on random assignment in evaluations of school choice? A within-study comparison. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 729–751.

14.

Bross

Harris

D. N.

(2016). How (and how well) do charter authorizers choose schools? Evidence from the Recovery School District in New Orleans. Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/publications/the-ultimate-choice-how-charter-authorizers-approve-and-renew-schools-in-post-katrina-new-orleans

15.

Carlson

Lavery

Witte

J. F.

(2012). Charter school authorizers and student achievement. Special Issue: Charter Schools, 31(2), 254–267.

16.

Cavanaugh

Gillan

K. J.

Kromrey

Hess

Blomeyer

(2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Learning Point Associates/North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bf44/876245b9d72f9030cd3ad0119ca87384d91f.pdf?_ga=2.248277255.1886720507.1565372477-1018020979.1565372477

17.

Cavazos

(2019, January 4). Indiana online schools have success lobbying lawmakers despite dismal academics. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/in/2019/01/04/indiana-online-schools-have-success-lobbying-lawmakers-despite-dismal-academics/

18.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2015). Online charter school study.

19.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2019a). Charter school performance in Idaho.

20.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2019b). Charter school performance in Ohio.

21.

Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2019c). Charter school performance in Pennsylvania.

22.

Clark

M. A.

Gleason

P. M.

Tuttle

C. C.

Silverberg

M. K.

(2015). Do charter schools improve student achievement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 419–436.

23.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.

24.

Cook

Shadish

Wong

(2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 724–750.

25.

Davis

D. H.

Raymond

M. E.

(2012). Choices for studying choice: Assessing charter school effectiveness using two quasi-experimental methods. Special Issue: Charter Schools, 31(2), 225–236.

26.

Dobbie

Fryer

R. G.

(2011). Are high quality schools enough to close the achievement gap? Evidence from a social experiment in Harlem. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 158–187.

27.

Dobbie

Fryer

R. G.

(2013). Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: Evidence from New York City. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5, 28–60.

28.

Dobbie

Fryer

R. G.

(2017). Charter schools and labor market outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 22502). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://sites.google.com/site/willdobbie/.

29.

Epple

Romano

Zimmer

(2015). Charter schools: A survey of research on their characteristics and effectiveness (Working Paper No. 21256). National Bureau of Economic Research.

30.

Ferrare

J. J.

(2020). Charter school outcomes. In Berends

Primus

Springer

M. G.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (2nd ed., pp. 160–173). Routledge.

31.

Fortson

Gleason

Kopa

Verbitsky-Savitz

(2014). Horseshoes, hand grenades, and treatment effects? Reassessing whether nonexperimental estimators are biased. Economics of Education Review, 44, 100–113.

32.

Gill

Walsh

Wulsin

C. S.

Matulewicz

Grau

Lee

Kerwin

(2015). Inside online charter schools. Mathematic Policy Research.

33.

Harris

D. N.

Sass

T. R.

(2011). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.

34.

Hart

C. M. D.

Berger

Jacob

Loeb

Hill

(2019). Online learning, offline outcomes: Online course taking and high school student performance. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419832852

35.

Hoxby

C. M.

Murarka

(2008). Methods of assessing the achievement of students in charter schools. In Berends

Springer

M. G.

Walberg

H. J.

(Eds.), Charter school outcomes (pp. 7–37). Erlbaum.

36.

Indiana Department of Education (2011). 2011-2012 ISTEP+ program manual: Policies and procedures for Indiana’s assessment system.

37.

Indiana Department of Education (2018). 2018 state graduation rate data. https://www.doe.in.gov/accountability/find-school-and-corporation-data-reports

38.

Jenkins

J. L.

DiPrete

T. A.

(2010). Teacher effects on social and behavioral skills in early elementary school. Sociology of Education, 83(2), 135–159.

39.

Kelly

Pogodzinski

Zhang

(2018). Teaching quality. In Schneider

(Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21^st century (pp. 275–296). Springer.

40.

Koedel

Mihaly

Rockoff

J. E.

(2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195.

41.

Lindsay

(2018, October 22). State committee recommends big shift for virtual charter school rules. WFYI Public Media. https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/state-committee-recommends-big-shift-for-virtual-charter-school-rules

42.

Means

Toyama

Murphy

Bakia

(2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

43.

Molnar

Miron

Elgeberi

Barbour

M. K.

Huerta

Shafer

S. R.

Rice

J. K.

(2019). Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2019. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2019

44.

Orfield

(2014). Tenth annual Brown Lecture in Education Research: A new civil rights agenda for american education. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 273–292.

45.

Rivkin

S. G.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.

46.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

47.

Waddington

R. J.

Berends

(2018). Impact of the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program: Achievement effects for students in upper elementary and middle school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(4), 783–808.

48.

Zimmer

Gill

B. P.

Attridge

Obenauf

(2014). Charter school authorizers and student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 9(1), 59–85.

49.

Zimmer

Gill

Booker

Lavertu

Witte

(2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. RAND Corporation.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.41 MB

Virtual Illusion: Comparing Student Achievement and Teacher and Classroom Characteristics in Online and Brick-and-Mortar Charter Schools

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material