When Making the Grade Isn’t Enough: The Gendered Nature of Premed Science Course Attrition

Abstract

Women take qualifying exams and enter medical school at substantially lower levels than predicted by their interest in medical degrees at the end of high school. We examined how science course experiences contribute to gendered attrition in premed using a multicohort data set of 8,253 undergraduates taking the traditional premed sequence of introductory science courses at a public research university between 2008 and 2016. Gendered attrition was not based in academic performance, was specific to high-performing women, and yet was grounded in competency beliefs. The result is that high-performing women often graduate with lower paying, lower status degrees. Motivational interventions in premed science courses will be critical for retaining high-performing women in premed, an important outcome with implications for equity and women’s health.

Keywords

equity gender longitudinal studies medical education motivation premed regression analyses retention STEM structural equation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

Dewitt

Osborne

Dillon

Willis

Wong

(2012). “Balancing acts": Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. doi:10.1002/sce.21031

Association of American Medical Colleges. (2017a). AAMC FACTS table (No. Tab. A-1). Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/data/facts/applicantmatriculant/

Association of American Medical Colleges. (2017b). Required premedical coursework and competencies. Retrieved from https://students-residents.aamc.org/choosing-medical-career/article/required-premedical-coursework-and-competencies/

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Barr

D. A.

(2010). Questioning the premedical paradigm: Enhancing diversity in the medical profession a century after the Flexner report. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Barr

D. A.

Gonzalez

M. E.

Wanat

S. F.

(2008). The leaky pipeline: Factors associated with early decline in interest in premedical studies among underrepresented minority undergraduate students. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 83(5), 503–511. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31816bda16

Bates

Gordon

Travis

Chatterjee

Chaudron

Fivush

. . . Moses

. (2016). Striving for gender equity in academic medicine careers. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1050–1052. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001283

Bauer

C. F.

(2005). Beyond “student attitudes”: Chemistry Self-Concept Inventory for assessment of the affective component of student learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(12), 1864. doi:10.1021/ed082p1864

Beede

Julian

Langdon

McKittrick

Khan

Doms

(2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation (No. Issue Brief 04-11). Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1964782

10.

Beyer

Bowden

E. M.

(1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172. doi:10.1177/0146167297232005

11.

Bickel

(2005). Gender equity in undergraduate medical education : A status report. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 10(3), 261–270.

12.

Boulis

A. K.

Jacobs

J. A.

(2008). The changing face of medicine: Women doctors and the evolution of health care in America. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.

13.

Cheryan

Ziegler

S. A.

Montoya

Jiang

(2016). Why are some STEM field more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 142(206), 1–131. doi:10.1037/bul0000052

14.

Cromley

J. G.

Perez

Kaplan

(2016). Undergraduate STEM achievement and retention: Cognitive, motivational, and institutional factors and solutions. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 4–11. doi:10.1177/2372732215622648

15.

Davis

Allison

(2013). Increasing representation, maintaining hierarchy: An assessment of gender and medical specialization. Social Thought and Research, 32, 17–45.

16.

Duckworth

A. L.

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198

17.

Eccles

J. S.

(1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x

18.

Eccles

J. S.

Wang

M. Te

. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100–106. doi:10.1177/0165025415616201

19.

Fiorentine

Cole

(1992). Why fewer women become physicians: Explaining the premed persistence gap. Sociological Forum, 7(3), 469–496. doi:10.1007/BF01117557

20.

Gee

J. P.

(2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

21.

Hazari

Sonnert

Sadler

P. M.

Shanahan

M.-C.

(2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. doi:10.1002/tea.20363

22.

Hyde

J. S.

(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581

23.

Johnson

P. A.

Fitzgerald

Salganicoff

Wood

Goldstein

(2014). Sex-specific medical research: Why women’s health can’t wait. Retrieved from https://www.brighamandwomens.org/Departments_and_Services/womenshealth/ConnorsCenter/Policy/ConnorsReportFINAL.pdf

24.

Kilminster

Downes

Gough

Murdoch-Eaton

Roberts

(2007). Women in medicine—Is there a problem? A literature review of the changing gender composition, structures and occupational cultures in medicine. Medical Education, 41(1), 39–49. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02645.x

25.

Kugler

A. D.

Tinsley

C. H.

Akerlof

Autor

Butcher

Figlio

. . . Lavy

. (2017). Choice of majors: Are women really different from men? (Working Paper No. 23735, National Bureau of Economic Research). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w23735

26.

Kvaerner

K. J.

Aasland

O. G.

Botten

G. S.

(1999). Female medical leadership: Cross sectional study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 318(7176), 91–94. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7176.91

27.

Lopez

M. H.

Gonzalez-Barrera

(2014). Women’s college enrollment gains leave men behind. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/1qckLFE

28.

Marsh

H. W.

(1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(7), 129–149. doi:10.3102/00028312023001129

29.

Mazure

C. M.

Jones

D. P.

(2015). Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical research. BMC Women’s Health, 15(1), 94. doi:10.1186/s12905-015-0251-9

30.

Morgan

S. L.

Gelbgiser

Weeden

K. A.

(2013). Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection. Social Science Research, 42(4), 989–1005. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.008

31.

O’Brien

R. M.

(2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

32.

S. S.

Lewis

G. B.

(2011). Stemming inequality? Employment and pay of female and minority scientists and engineers. Social Science Journal, 48(2), 397–403. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2010.11.008

33.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Health care resources. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?datasetcode=HEALTH_REAC&lang=en#

34.

Page

(2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

35.

Perkins

Kleiner

Roey

Brown

(2004). The high school transcript study: A decade of change in curricula and achievement, 1990–2000. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004455.pdf

36.

Reed

Buddeberg-Fischer

(2001). Career obstacles for women in medicine: An overview. Medical Education, 35(2), 139–147. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00837.x

37.

Riska

(2011). Gender and medical careers. Maturitas, 68(3), 264–267. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.09.010

38.

Rosenthal

Levy

S. R.

London

Lobel

Bazile

(2013). In pursuit of the MD: The impact of role models, identity compatibility, and belonging among undergraduate women. Sex Roles, 68(7–8), 464–473. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0257-9

39.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modelingle. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02

40.

Ryan

C. L.

Bauman

(2016). Educational attainment in the United States: 2015 population characteristics (No. P20-578). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p20-578.pdf

41.

Sadler

P. M.

Sonnert

Hazari

Tai

(2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. doi:10.1002/sce.21007

42.

Sanfey

H. A.

(2006). Influences on medical student career choice. Archives of Surgery, 141(11), 1086. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1086

43.

Schunk

D. H.

Meece

J. L.

(2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In Pajares

Urdan

(Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 71–96). Greewich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

44.

Semsar

Knight

J. K.

Birol

Smith

M. K.

(2011). The Colorado Learning Attitudes About Science Survey (CLASS) for use in biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 268–278. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-10-0133

45.

Siriwardena

A. N.

Irish

Asghar

Z. B.

Dixon

Milne

Neden

. . . Blow

. (2012). Comparing performance among male and female candidates in sex-specific clinical knowledge in the MRCGP. British Journal of General Practice, 62(599), 446–450. doi:10.3399/bjgp12X649142

46.

Spelke

E. S.

(2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: A critical review. The American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.9.950

47.

Tsugawa

Jena

A. B.

Figueroa

J. F.

Orav

E. J.

Blumenthal

D. M.

Jha

A. K.

(2017). Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(2), 206–213. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875

48.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statisics. (2017). Women in the labor force : A databook (Rep. No. 1065). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2010.pdf

49.

Vincent-Ruz

Binning

Schunn

C. D.

Grabowski

(2018). The effect of math SAT on women’s chemistry competency beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19, 342–351. doi:10.1039/C7RP00137A

50.

Vincent-Ruz

Schunn

C. D.

(2017). The increasingly important role of science competency beliefs for science learning in girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 790–822. doi:10.1002/tea.21387

51.

Wang

M.-T.

Eccles

J. S.

Kenny

(2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775. doi:10.1177/0956797612458937

52.

Watt

H. M. G.

Eccles

J. S.

Durik

A. M.

(2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 642–659. doi:10.1108/02610150610719119

53.

Weisgram

E. S.

Diekman

A. B.

(2017). Making STEM “family friendly”: The impact of perceiving science careers as family-compatible. Social Sciences, 6(2), 61. doi:10.3390/socsci6020061

54.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

55.

Zohar

Bronshtein

(2005). Physics teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding girls’ low participation rates in advanced physics classes. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 61–77. doi:10.1080/0950069032000138798

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.60 MB

2.94 MB

0.01 MB