Informed by the theoretical lens of opportunity hoarding, this study considers whether STEM postsecondary fields stand apart via the disproportionate exclusion of Black and Latina/o youth. Utilizing national data from the Beginning Postsecondary Study (BPS), the authors investigate whether Black and Latina/o youth who begin college as STEM majors are more likely to depart than their White peers, either by switching fields or by leaving college without a degree, and whether patterns of departure in STEM fields differ from those in non-STEM fields. Results reveal evidence of persistent racial/ethnic inequality in STEM degree attainment not found in other fields.
AndersonE. (2010). The importance of integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
ArcidiaconoP. (2004). Ability sorting and the returns to college major. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 343–375.
3.
ArcidiaconoP.AucejoE.HotzV. J. (2016). University differences in the graduation of minorities in STEM fields: Evidence from California. American Economic Review, 106(3), 525–562.
4.
BeasleyM. A. (2011). Opting out: Losing the potential of America’s young Black elite. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BeasleyM. A.FischerM. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427–448.
6.
ChangM. J.SharknessJ.HurtadoS.NewmanC. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–677.
7.
ChenX. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES No. 2009-161). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
8.
ChenX. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
DicksonL. (2010). Race and gender differences in college major choice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627, 108–124.
10.
EaganK.HurtadoS.FigueroaT.HughesB. (2015). Examining STEM pathways among students who begin college at four-year institutions (Commissioned Paper Prepared for the Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2- and 4-Year STEM Degrees). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_088834.pdf
11.
FerrareJ. J.LeeY. (2014). Should we still be talking about leaving? A comparative examination of social inequality in undergraduate patterns of switching majors (WCER Working Paper No. 2014-5). Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php
12.
GarrisonH. (2013). Underrepresentation by race–ethnicity across stages of U.S. science and engineering education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 357–363.
13.
GriffithA. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922.
14.
GuiffridaD. A. (2003). African American student organizations as agents of social integration. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 304–319.
15.
HanselmanP.FielJ. (2017). School opportunity hoarding? Racial segregation and access to high growth schools. Social Forces, 95(3), 1077–1104.
KaoG.ThompsonJ. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442.
18.
KellyS. (2009). The Black-White gap in mathematics course-taking. Sociology of Education, 82, 47–69.
19.
KellyS.PriceH. (2011). The correlates of tracking policy: Opportunity hoarding, status competition, or a technical-functional explanation?American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 560–585.
20.
LaneT. B. (2016). Beyond academic and social integration: Understanding the impact of a STEM enrichment program on the retention and degree attainment of underrepresented students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 1–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0070
21.
LewisA.DiamondJ. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
Lewis-McCoyR. (2014). Inequality in the promised land. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
McGeeE. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino identities: A by-product of STEM college culture?American Educational ResearchJournal, 53(6), 1626–1662.
24.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support diverse student pathways. Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees. MalcomS.FederM. (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Board on Higher Education and the Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21739
25.
National Academy of Science. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
26.
PriceJ. (2010). The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 901–910.
27.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB. (2010). Questioning a White male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major. Educational Researcher, 39, 656–664.
28.
RoystonP. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ice. The Stata Journal, 5(4), 527–536.
29.
RuryJ.SaatciogluA. (2011). Suburban advantage: Opportunity hoarding and secondary attainment in the postwar metropolitan north. American Journal of Education, 117, 307–342.
30.
SeymourE.HewittN. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
31.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2012). Digest of education statistics 2011 (NCES 2012-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
32.
TillyC. (1997). Durable inequality. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
33.
TillyC. (2000). Relational studies of inequality. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 782–785.
34.
TillyC. (2007). Unequal access to scientific knowledge. Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 245–258.
35.
ValenciaR. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
WineJ.JansonN.WheelessS. (2011). 2004/09 Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS:04/09): Full-scale methodology report (NCES 2012-246). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
37.
WoodcockA.HernandezP. R.EstradaM.SchultzP. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 635–646. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/a0029120
38.
XieY.FangM.ShaumanK. (2015). STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331–357.
39.
XieY.KillewaldA. A. (2012). Is American science in decline?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
