Sexual minorities’ risk for exclusionary discipline is a commonly cited indicator of the challenges that these students face. The current study addresses this issue by introducing a new data source for research on sexual minority students: the Fragile Families and Childhood Wellbeing Study. In this geographically diverse, population-based sample, I find that sexual minorities continue to face higher rates of discipline than their peers. However, this risk is highly stratified by sex: Same-sex attraction is associated with 95% higher odds of discipline among girls but no apparent discipline risk among boys. Sexual minority girls’ risk for discipline is only partially mediated by behavior, a result that is plausibly consistent with the interpretation that these students continue to face discriminatory treatment in schools.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families.
2.
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2012). Practice parameter on gay, lesbian, or bisexual sexual orientation, gender nonconformity, and gender discordance in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(9), 957–974.
3.
ArredondoM.GrayC.RussellS.SkibaR.SnappS. (2016). Documenting disparities for LGBT students: Expanding the collection and reporting of data on sexual orientation and gender identity. Bloomington, IN: Discipline Disparities: A Research-to-Practice Collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~atlantic/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/SOGI-Brief-Final.pdf
4.
BellingerL. B.DarcangeloN.HornS. S.MeinersE. R.SchriberS. (2016). Ecologies of school discipline for queer youth: What listening to queer youth teaches us about transforming school discipline. In SkibaR. J.MedirattaK.RauschM. K. (Eds.), Inequality in School discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 135–153). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
ChmielewskiJ. F.BelmonteK. M.StoudtB. G.FineM. (2016). Intersectional inquiries with LGBTQ and gender nonconforming youth of color: Participatory research on discipline disparities at the race/sexuality/gender nexus. In SkibaR. J.MedirattaK.RauschM. K. (Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 171–188). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
CianciottoJ.CahillS. (2012). LGBT youth in America’s schools. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
7.
CokerT. R.AustinS. B.SchusterM. A. (2010). The health and health care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 457–77.
8.
Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate. (2012). Ending the school-to-prison pipeline: Hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate (Serial No. J–112–95). Washington, DC: The United States Senate.
9.
Council of State Governments. (2014). The school discipline consensus report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system. New York, NY: The Council of State Governments Justice Center. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/youth/school-discipline-consensus-report/
10.
DunlapA. (2016). Changes in coming out milestones across five age cohorts. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 28(1), 20–38.
11.
EnglandP.MishelE.CaudilloM. L. (2016). Increases in sex with same-sex partners and bisexual identity across cohorts of women (but not men). Sociological Science, 3, 951–970.
12.
FabeloT.ThompsonM. D.PlotkinM.CarmichaelD.MarchbanksM. P.IIIBoothE. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York, NY: The Council of State Governments Justice Center & Public Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from https://csgjusticecenter.org/youth/breaking-schools-rules-report/
13.
FanX.MillerB. C.ChristensenM.ParkK.GrotevantH. D.van DulmenM.BayleyB. (2002). Questionnaire and interview inconsistencies exaggerated differences between adopted and non-adopted adolescents in a national sample. Adoption Quarterly, 6(2), 7–27.
14.
FanX.MillerB. C.ParkK.WinwardB. W.ChristensenM.GrotevantH. D.TaiR. H. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods, 18(3), 223–244.
15.
FergusonA. A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16.
FishJ. N.RussellS. T. (in press). Have mischievous responders misidentified sexual minority youth disparities in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health?Archives of Sexual Behavior.
17.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.NogueraP. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68.
18.
HimmelsteinK. E. W.BrücknerH. (2011). Criminal-justice and school sanctions against nonheterosexual youth: A national longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127(1), 49–57.
19.
ImaiK.KeeleL.TingleyD. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334.
20.
KannL.OlsenE. O.McManusT.HarrisW. A.ShanklinS. L.FlintK. H.. . . ZazaS. (2016). Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-related behaviors among students in Grades 9–12: United States and selected sites, 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
21.
KosciwJ. G.GreytakE. A.GigaN. M.VillenasC.DanischewskiD. J. (2016). The 2015 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools. New York, NY: GLSEN. Retrieved from https://www.glsen.org/article/2015-national-school-climate-survey
22.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2017). Girls behaving badly? Race, gender, and subjective evaluation in the discipline of African American girls. Sociology of Education, 90(2), 127–148.
23.
MorrisM. M. (2016). Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. New York, NY: The New Press.
24.
NakamuraB. J.EbesutaniC.BernsteinA.ChorpitaB. F. (2009). A psychometric analysis of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(3), 178–189.
25.
National Research Council. (2011). The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: Building a foundation for better understanding. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
26.
OkonofuaJ. A.EberhardtJ. L. (2015). Two strikes: Race and the disciplining of young students. Psychological Science, 26(5), 617–624.
27.
PascoeC. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
PiqueroA. (2008). Disproportionate minority contact. The Future of Children, 18(2), 59–79.
29.
PoteatP. V.ScheerJ. R.ChongE. S. K. (2016). Sexual orientation-based disparities in school and juvenile justice discipline: A multiple group comparison of contributing factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 229–241.
30.
RameyD. M. (2015). The social structure of criminalized and medicalized school discipline. Sociology of Education, 88(3), 181–201.
31.
ReichmanN. E.TeitlerJ. O.GarfinkelI.McLanahanS. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(4/5), 303–326.
32.
Robinson-CimpianJ. P. (2014). Inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders: Several suggestions to assess conclusions. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 171–185.
33.
Savin-WilliamsR. C. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Savin-WilliamsR. C.JoynerK. (2014). The dubious assessment of gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents of AddHealth. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(3), 413–422.
35.
SkibaR. J.ChungC.TrachokM.BakerT. L.SheyaA.HughesR. L. (2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670.
36.
SnappS. D.HoenigJ. M.FieldsA.RussellS. T. (2015). Messy, butch, and queer: LGBTQ youth and the school-to-prison pipeline. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30(1), 57–82.
37.
SnappS. D.RussellS. T.ArredondoM.SkibaR. (2016). A right to disclose: LGBTQ youth representation in data, science, and policy. In HornS. S.RuckM. D.LibenL. S. (Eds.), Equity and justice in developmental science: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 135–159). New York, NY: Elsevier.
38.
ToomeyR. B.RussellS. T. (2016). The role of sexual orientation in school-based victimization: A Meta-analysis. Youth & Society, 48(2), 176–201.
WilsonB. D. M.JordanS. P.MeyerI. H.FloresA. R.StempleL.HermanJ. L. (2017). Disproportionality and disparities among sexual minority youth in custody. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1547–1561.
41.
WimberlyG. L. (Ed.). (2015). LGBTQ issues in education: Advancing a research agenda. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
42.
WimberlyG. L.BattleJ. (2015). Challenges to doing research on LGBTQ issues in education and important research needs. In WimberlyG. L. (Ed.), LGBTQ issues in education: Advancing a research agenda (pp. 219–236). Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
