While there is a robust literature examining the patterns and causes of teacher turnover, few articles to date have critically examined the measures of turnover used in these studies. Yet, an assessment of the way turnover is measured is important, as the measures become the means by which the “problem” of turnover becomes defined and its varying dimensions understood. In this conceptual essay, we outline a typology of teacher turnover measures, discussing both measures used in existing teacher turnover literature as well as new measures that we have developed. We illustrate each of the measures using 10 years of administrative data from Texas. We discuss how the measures can help illuminate different ways in which staff instability can affect schools and identify schools that suffer from particularly severe staffing issues. We conclude with implications for policymakers and researchers who may seek to apply these measures to future empirical studies.
AllensworthE.PonisciakS.MazzeoC. (2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago Public Schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
2.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2017). Teacher churning: Reassignment rates and implications for student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 3–30. doi:10.3102/0162373716659929
3.
AudS.HussarW.PlantyM.SnyderT.BiancoK.FoxM.. . . DrakeL. (2010). The condition of education 2010 (NCES 2010-028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
4.
BéteilleT.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41(4), 904–919.
5.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333.
6.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132.
7.
BrykA. S.GomezL. M.GrunowA.LeMahieuP. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
8.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.
CamburnE. M.SpillaneJ. P.SebastianJ. (2010). Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 707–737.
12.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2011). The long-term impacts of teachers: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood (No. w17699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
13.
ClotfelterC. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
ClotfelterC. TLaddH.VigdorJ.DiazR. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high quality teachers?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 251–271.
15.
ClotfelterC.LaddH.F.VigdorJ.WheelerJ. (2007). High poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. Durham, NC: Sanford Institute of Public Policy.
16.
CoburnC. E.RussellJ. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
EdwardsA. (2014). The dynamics of economic well-being: Poverty, 2009–2011 (Report No. P70–137). Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.
19.
ElmoreR. (2003). Accountability and capacity. In CarnoyM.ElmoreR.SiskinL. S. (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 195–209). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
FengL.FiglioD.SassT. (2010). School accountability and teacher mobility. Washington, DC: CALDER (Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Educational Research).
21.
FinniganK. S.DalyA. J. (2012). Mind the gap: Organizational learning and improvement in an underperforming urban system. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 41–71.
22.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM. (2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012–13 Teacher Follow-up Survey (NCES 2014-077). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354.
24.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2010). Constrained job matching: Does teacher job search harm disadvantaged urban schools? (No. w15816). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G.SchimanJ. C. (2016). Dynamic effects of teacher turnover on the quality of instruction. Economics of Education Review, 55, 132–148.
26.
HolmeJ. J.RangelV. S. (2012). Putting school reform in its place: Social geography, organizational social capital, and school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 257–283.
27.
HorngE. L.KlasikD.LoebS. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491–523.
28.
IcelandJ. (1997). The dynamics of poverty spells and issues of left censoring. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.
29.
IcelandJ. (2013). Poverty in America: A handbook. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
31.
IngersollR. M.MayH. (2012). The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 435–464.
32.
IngersollR. M.PerdaD. (2010). Is the supply of mathematics and science teachers sufficient?American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 563–594.
33.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
34.
KimberlinS.Duerr BerrickJ. D. (2015). Poor for how long? Chronic versus transient child poverty in the United States. In FernandezE.ZeiraA.VecchiatoT.CanaliC. (Eds.), Theoretical and empirical insights into child and family poverty (pp. 141–158). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
35.
KraftM. A.MarinellW. H.YeeD. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1499.
36.
LaddH. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235–261.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.
42.
SimonN. S.JohnsonS. M. (2013). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–36.
43.
SmylieM. A.EvansA. E. (2006). Social capital and the problem of implementation. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 187–208). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
44.
SpillaneJ. P.KimC. M.FrankK. A. (2012). Instructional advice and information providing and receiving behavior in elementary schools exploring tie formation as a building block in social capital development. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1112–1145.
45.
SutcherL.Darling-HammondL.Carver-ThomasD. (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the U.S. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
46.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). Better use of information could help agencies identify disparities and address racial discrimination (GAO-16-345). Washington, DC: Author.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
