You are on the new improved site. You can view the old site in view-only mode here until June 27, 2026

Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

/

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

Copyright © 2026 by Sage Publications.京ICP备09090397号-11

Educational Researcher

Impact Factor: 4.9 / 5-Year Impact Factor: 7.5

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

Letter

First published online 2016-5

VAMs Are Never “Accurate,Reliable,and Valid”

Volume 45, Issue 4

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651081

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1.

American Educational Research Association. (2015). AERA statement on use of value-added models (VAM) for the evaluation of educators and educator preparation programs. Educational Researcher, 44, 448–452.

2.

Klees

S.

(2016). Inferences from regression analysis; Are they valid. Real World Economics Review, 74, 85–97.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues

Similar articles

Retricted access

Nonprofits into the core? An early assessment of potential curricular changes after the 2019 NASPAA standards amendments

Retricted access

Teaching Techniques of Analysis in the MPA Curriculum: Research Methods,Management Science,and “The Third Path”

Retricted access

A review of Title IX and the impact of the ‘Dear Colleague’ Letter on sexual assault reporting policies: Evidence from Massachusetts

Retricted access

John Glenn College of Public Affairs Dean Trevor Brown’s remarks as the new President of NASPAA