For a century, AERA has had as its mission using research to improve K–12 and higher education practices. Born in a period of reform, the Association’s mission—reformist both in spirit and the letter—has been articulated time and again by its elected presidents. As different reform movements have swept across U.S. schools, as demographics and contexts changed, elected presidents reflecting those shifting reforms, contexts, and demographics have adhered to the founding mission of the Association. Using presidents’ addresses across the century, I show that the belief in using research to improve practice has remained stable yet contested in recent decades.
BallA. (2012). To know is not enough: Knowledge power, and the zone of generativity. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 283–293.
3.
BallouF. (1916). Improving instruction through educational measurement. Proceedings N.E.A., 1086–1093.
4.
BerlinerD.ResnickL. B.CubanL.ColeN.PophamW. J.GoodladJ. I. (1997). “The vision thing”: Educational research and AERA in the 21st century, part 2: Competing visions for enhancing the impact of educational research. Educational Researcher, 26(5), 12–18, 27.
5.
BloomB. (1966). Twenty-five years of educational research. American Educational Research Journal, 3(3), 211–221.
6.
BowersC. A. (1964). The Social Frontier Journal: A historical sketch. History of Education Quarterly, 4(3), 167–180.
7.
BransfordJ.StipekD. J.VyeN. J.GomezL. M.LamD. (Eds.). (2009). The role of research in educational improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
8.
BuckinghamB. R. (1920). A proposed index of efficiency in teaching United States history. Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 161–171.
9.
CallahanR. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CoburnC.SteinM. K.(Eds.). (2010). Research and practice in education. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
11.
CreminL. (1964). The transformation of the school. New York, NY: Vintage.
12.
CubanL. (2007). The blackboard and the bottom line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Darling-HammondL. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5–17.
14.
GageN. (Ed.). (1963). Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
15.
GrubbN.LazersonM. (2007). The education gospel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
JacksonP. (1990). The functions of educational research. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 3–9.
17.
KennedyM. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4–12.
18.
KerlingerF. (1977). The influence of research on educational practice. Educational Researcher, 6(8), 5–12.
19.
LabareeD. (2005). Progressivism, schools and schools of education: An American romance. Paedagogica Historica, 41, 275–288.
20.
LabareeD. (2007, November). Limits on the impact of educational reform: The case of Progressivism and U.S. schools, 1900-1950. Paper presented at The Century of the School: Continuity and Innovation During the First Half of the 20th Century, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland.
21.
LabareeD. (2012). Someone has to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the educational debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12.
23.
LagemannE. (2000). An elusive science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MarquisC.TilcsikA. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 193–243.
26.
MershonS.SchlossmanS. (2008). The education, science, and the politics of knowledge: The American Educational Research Association, 1915–1940. American Journal of Education, 114, 307–340.
27.
PetersonP. (1998). Why do educational research? Rethinking our roles and identities, our texts and contexts. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 4–10.
28.
RavitchD. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reform. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
RichardsonV. (Ed.). (2001). Fourth handbook of research on teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
31.
SchoenfeldA. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4–14.
32.
ShavelsonR. (1988). Contributions of educational research to policy and practice: Constructing, challenging, changing cognition. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 4–11, 22.
33.
ShepardL. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
34.
TraversR.(Ed.). (1973). Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
35.
TraversR. (1983). How research has changed American Schools. Kalamazoo, MI: Mythos Press.
36.
TyackD. (1974). One best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
TyackD.CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
TyackD.HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue. New York, NY: Basic Books.
39.
WittrockM. (Ed.). (1986). Third handbook of research on teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan.
40.
WoodyC. (1924). A survey of educational research in 1923. Journal of Educational Research, 9(5), 357–381.
41.
ZilversmitA. (1993). Changing schools: Progressive education theory and practice, 1930–1960. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
