A chasm is growing between our rapidly rising aspirations for our educational systems and what schools can routinely accomplish. Education needs an improvement paradigm—one that recognizes the complexity of the work of education and the wide variability in outcomes that our systems currently produce. This article sketches out such a paradigm. It joins together the discipline of improvement science with the power of structured networked communities to accelerate learning to improve. These networked improvement communities (NICs) combine analytic thinking and systematic methods to develop and test changes that can achieve better outcomes more reliably. NICs are inclusive in drawing together the expertise of practitioners, researchers, designers, technologists, and many others. And they organize their activities in ways akin to a scientific community. They develop practice-based evidence as an essential complement to findings from other forms of educational research. The point is not just to know what can make things better or worse; it is to develop the know-how necessary to actually make things better.
AxelrodR. M.CohenM. D. (2000). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York, NY: Free Press.
2.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.
3.
BarkhamM.Mellor-ClarkJ. (2003). Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: Developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10(6), 319–327.
4.
BrykA. S.GomezL. M.GrunowA. (2010). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
5.
BrykA. S.GomezL. M.GrunowA.LeMahieuP. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CohenD. K. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
9.
DolleJ. R.GomezL. M.RussellJ. L.BrykA. S. (2014). More than a network: Building professional communities for educational improvement. In FishmanB. J.PenuelW. R. (Eds.), Design-based implementation research: Theories, methods, and exemplars (pp. 443–463). New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
10.
ElmoreR.BurneyD. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in community school district #2. New York, NY: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future & the Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
11.
ElmoreR.BurneyD. (1998). Continuous improvement in community school district #2. New York, NY: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, High Performance Learning Communities Project.
12.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 393–394.
13.
FinkE.ResnickL. B. (2001). Developing principals as instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(8), 598–606.
14.
FishmanB. J.PenuelW. R.AllenA.-R.ChengB. H.SabelliN. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. In FishmanB. J.PenuelW. R. (Eds.), National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 136–156). New York, NY: Teachers College Record.
15.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FountasI. C.PinellG. S. (2001). Guiding readers and writers (Grades 3-6): Teaching, comprehension, genre, and content literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Gallup. (2014). State of America’s schools: The path to winning again in education. Washington, DC: Gallup.
GouldS. J. (1985). The median isn’t the message. Discover, 6, 40–42.
22.
GrahamP. (2005). Schooling America: How the public schools meet the nation’s changing needs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
GreenL. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence?Family Practice, 25(Supplement 1), I20–I24.
24.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–290.
25.
HiebertJ.GallimoreR.StiglerJ. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like, and how can we get one?Educational Researcher, 31, 3–15.
26.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K. (2009). Building a knowledge base for teacher education: An experience in K–8 mathematics teacher preparation. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 475–490.
27.
HutchinsE. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19(3), 265–405.
28.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2012). Best care at lower costs: The path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30.
JacobB. A.LevittS. (2003). Catching cheating teachers: The results of an unusual experiment in implementing theory (Working Paper No. 9413). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9414
31.
LangleyG. L.MoenR. D.NolanK. M.NolanT. W.NormanC. L.ProvostL. P. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MayH.GrayA.GillespieJ.SirinidesP.SamC.GoldsworthyH.. . . TognottaN. (2013). Evaluation of the i3 scale-up of Reading Recovery: Year one report, 2011–12 (CPRE Research Report No. RR-76). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
34.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 378–386.
35.
MillerJ. H.PageS. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
NielsenM. A. (2012). Reinventing discovery: The new era of networked science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
PascaleR.SterninJ.SterninM. (2010). The power of positive deviance: How unlikely innovators solve the world’s toughest problems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
39.
PentlandA. (2014). Social physics: How good ideas spread—the lessons learned from a new science. New York: Penguin Press.
40.
PfefferJ.SuttonR. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41.
RoderickM. (1994). Grade retention and school dropout: Investigating the association. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 729–759.
42.
SuttonR. I.RaoH. (2014). Scaling up excellence: Getting to more without settling for less. New York, NY: Crown Business.
43.
TyackD.CubanL. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
WeisbergH. I. (2014). Willful ignorance: The mismeasure of uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
