The Value in Value Added Depends on the Ecology

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

American Statistical Association. (2014). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf

Ballou D. Springer M. G. (2015). Using student test scores to measure teacher performance: Some problems in the design and implementation of evaluation systems [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 77–86.

Betebenner D. (2009). Growth, standards and accountability. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.nciea.org/publications/growthandStandard_DB09.pdf

Bird S. Cox D. Farewell V. Goldstein H. Holt T. Smith P. (2005). Performance indicators: Good, bad, ugly. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 168(1), 1–27.

Braun H. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teaching: A primer on value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.

Braun H. (2012). The many facets of growth modeling. Unpublished PARCC Briefing Paper.

Campbell D. T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Hanover, NH: Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.

Chetty R. Friedman J. N. Rockoff J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632.

Committee on Value-Added Methodology for Instructional Improvement, Program Evaluation, and Accountability; Board on Testing and Assessment; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Research Council; & National Academy of Education. (2010). In Braun H. Chudowsky N. Koenig J. (Eds.), Getting value out of value-added: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Goldhaber D. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 87–95.

Goldring E. Grissom J. A. Rubin M. Neumerski C. M. Cannata M. Drake T. Schuermann P. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 96–104.

Hargreaves A. Braun H. (2013). Data-driven improvement and accountability [Policy brief]. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.

Harris D. (2007). The promises and pitfalls of alternative teacher compensation approaches. East Lansing, MI: Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice. Retrieved from http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Harris_Merit%20Pay.pdf

Harris D. (2009). Would accountability based on teacher value-added be smart policy? An examination of the statistical properties and policy alternatives. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 319–350.

Harris D. (2011). Value-added measures in education: What every educator needs to know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Hill H. Kapitula L. Umland K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794–831.

Jiang J. Y. Sporte S. E. Luppescu S. (2015). Teacher perspectives on evaluation reform: Chicago’s REACH students [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 105–116.

Johnson S. M. (2015). Will VAMS reinforce the walls of the egg-crate school? [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 117–126.

Key issues in value-added modeling [Special issue]. (2009). Education Finance and Policy, 4(4).

Marion S. F. (2014). Using common assignments and an SLO framework to support educator effectiveness in Kentucky and Colorado. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.

Measured Progress. (2014). A system for using student academic growth in the evaluation of teaching effectiveness in the non-tested subjects and grades. Dover, NH: Author.

Measures of Effective Teaching. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET Project’s three-year study [Policy and practice brief]. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

National Research Council. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in Education. Hout M. Elliott S.W. , (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Rothstein J. (2014). Revisiting the impacts of teachers [Technical report]. Berkeley: Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley.

Steinberg M. P. Sartain L. (2015). Does better observation make better teachers? Education Next, 15(1). Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/better-observation-make-better-teachers/