Most members of the American public will never read this article. Instead, they will obtain much of their information about education from the news media. Yet little academic research has examined the type or quality of education research and expertise they will find there. Through the lens of gatekeeping theory, this mixed-methods study aims to address that gap by examining the prevalence of news media citations of evidence that has undergone the quality-control measure of peer review and expertise associated with academics generally required to have expertise in their fields. Results suggest that, unlike science or medical journalists, education writers virtually never cite peer-reviewed research. Nor do they use the American Educational Research Association as a resource. Academic experts are also underrepresented in news media coverage, especially when compared to government officials. Barriers between the news media and academia include structural differences between research on education and the medical or life sciences as well as journalists’ lack of knowledge of the definition and value of peer review and tendency to apply and misapply news values to social science research and expertise.
AmendE.SeckoD. M. (2011). In the face of critique: A metasynthesis of the experiences of journalists covering health and science. Science Communication, 34(2), 241–282. doi: 10.1177/1075547011409952
BreedW. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33(4), 326–335.
5.
BrittR. (2012). Universities report highest-ever R&D spending of $65 billion in FY 2011 (InfoBrief). Arlington, VA: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation.
6.
BrunsA. (2009). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
CassidyW. (2006). Gatekeeping similar for online, print journalists. Newspaper Research Journal, 27(2), 6–23.
9.
CroteauD.HoynesW.MilanS. (2012). Media society: Industries, images, and audiences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
DunwoodyS. (1980). The science writing inner club: A communication link between science and the lay public. Science, Technology & Human Values, 5(3), 14–22.
11.
GamsonW. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GansH. (2004). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. 25th Anniversary Edition. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
13.
GerbnerG.GrossL.MorganM.SignorielliN. (1982). Political correlates of television viewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(1), 283–300.
14.
GraberD. (2009). Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
15.
HaasE. (2007). False equivalency: Think tank references on education in the news media. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(1), 63–102.
16.
HaasT. (2005). From “Public Journalism” to the “Public’s Journalism”? Rhetoric and reality in the discourse on weblogs. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 387–396. doi: 10.1080/14616700500132073
17.
HenigJ. (2008). Spin cycle: How research is used in policy debates: The case of charter schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation and The Century Foundation.
18.
HesterJ.DougallE. (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811–824.
19.
HowellW. (2008). Education policy, academic research, and public opinion. In HessF. (Ed.), When research matters: How scholarship influences education policy (pp. 135–153). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
LagemannE. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
LacyS.RiffeD. (1996). Sampling error and selecting inter-coder reliability samples for nominal content categories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 963–973.
22.
LacyS.RobinsonK.RiffeD. (1995). Sample size in content analysis of weekly newspapers. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 336–345.
23.
LaiW.LaneT. (2009). Characteristics of medical research news reported on front pages of newspapersPLos ONE, 4(7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006103
24.
LeCompteM.SchensulJ. (1999). Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
25.
LewinK. (1997). Resolving social conflicts; and, Field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
LivingstonS.BennettW. L. (2003). Gatekeeping, indexing, and live-event news: Is technology altering the construction of news?Political Communication, 20(4), 363–380. doi: 10.1080/10584600390244121
27.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28.
Pew Research Center. (2011). The state of the news media: An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.
29.
Pew Research Center. (2013). The state of the news media 2013: An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.
30.
ReeseS.DanielianL. (Eds.). (1989). Intermedia influence and the drug issue: Converging on cocaine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
RichA. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
RiffeD.AustC.LacyS. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 133–139.
33.
RosenstielT.MitchellA.PurcellK.RainieL. (2011). How people learn about their local community. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.
34.
ShoemakerP.VosT. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
SingerJ. (2006). Stepping back from the gate: Online newspaper editors and the co-production of content in campaign 2004. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(2), 265–280.
36.
StackM. (2007). Constructing “common sense” policies for schools: The role of journalists. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 247–264. doi: 10.1080/13603120701373649
37.
StockingH.GrossP. (1989). How do journalists think? A proposal for the study of cognitive bias in newsmaking. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills: Smith Research Center, Indiana University.
38.
StormJ. (2007, May). The endurance of gatekeeping in an evolving newsroom: A multimethod study of web-generated user content. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
39.
SuleskiJ.IbarakiM. (2010). Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 19(1), 115–125. doi: 10.1177/0963662508096776
40.
SwansonC.BarlageJ. (2006). Influence: A study of factors shaping education policy. Washington, DC: Editorial Projects in Education Research Center.
41.
ReutersThomson (Ed.). (2010). Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index. Philadelphia, PA: Thomson Reuters.
42.
TunstallJ. (1971). Journalists at work: Specialist correspondents: Their news organizations, news sources, and competitor-colleagues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
UngderleiderC. (2006). Government, neo-liberal media, and education in Canada. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(1), 70–90.
44.
ViaderoD. (2009, October14). Scholars spar over research methods used to evaluate charters. Education Week, pp. 6–7.
45.
WeaverD.BeamR.BrownleeB.VoakesP.WilhoitG. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of a new millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
WeissC.SingerE. (1988). Reporting of social science in the national media. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
WestD.WhitehurstG.DionneE. J. (2011). Americans want more coverage of teacher performance and student achievement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
48.
WhiteD. (1950). The gatekeeper: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–396.
49.
YettickH. (2009). The research that reaches the public: Who produces the educational research mentioned in the news media?Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
