Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper reports on the progress of users through 16 Coursera courses taught by University of Pennsylvania faculty for the first time between June 2012 and July 2013. Using descriptive analyses, this study advances knowledge by considering two definitions of massive open online course (MOOC) users (registrants and starters), comparing two approaches to measuring student progress through a MOOC course (sequential versus user driven), and examining several measures of MOOC outcomes and milestones. The patterns of user progression found in this study may not describe current or future patterns given the continued evolution of MOOCs. Nonetheless, the findings provide a baseline for future studies.

Keywords

postsecondary education retention technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashby

(2004). Monitoring student retention in the open university: Definition, measurement, interpretation and action. Open Learning, 19(1), 63–78.

Baxter

(2012). Who am I and what keeps me going? Profiling the distance learning student in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 107–129.

Bowen

W. G.

Chingos

M. M.

Lack

K. A.

Nygren

T. I.

(2012). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. New York, NY: Ithaka S+R.

Brinton

C. G.

Lam

Chiang

Liu

Jain

Wong

(2013). Learning about social learning in MOOCs: From statistical analysis to generative model. Unpublished manuscript.

Brooke

C. G.

(2003). Where do you want to learn tomorrow? The paradox of the virtual university. In Kolko

B. E.

(Ed.), Virtual publics: Policy and community in the electronic age (pp. 265–285). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Carmichael

(2008, June 4). Employer tuition assistance programs. Fastweb. Retrieved from http://www.fastweb.com/financial-aid/articles/709-employer-tuition-assistance-programs

Carnoy

Jarillo Rabling

Castano-Munoz

Duart Montoliu

J. M.

Sancho-Vinuesa

(2012). Who attends and completes virtual universities: The case of the open University of Catalonia (UOC). Higher Education, 63, 53–82.

Council for Adult and Experiential Learning. (2007). Enrollment decisions and persistence of on-line learners in NACTEL and EPCE: An exploratory study. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from from http://www.cael.org/pdfs/SloanReport

Creelman

Reneland-Forsman

(2013). Completion rates: A false trail to measure quality? Let’s call in the HEROEs instead. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2013&halfyear=2&article=583

10.

Cusack

(2014, January 10). A handy cheatsheet on MOOCs. edSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/n/2014-01-10-a-handy-cheatsheet-on-moocs

11.

Daniel

(2012, September 24). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blog4222.blogspot.ca/2012/09/making-sense-of-moocs-musings-in-maze.html

12.

DeBoer

A. D.

Stump

G. S.

Breslow

(2014). Changing “course”: Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43, 74–84.

13.

Dodd

(2014, October 6). Top MOOC provider edX no longer free for all. Financial Review. Retrieved from http://www.afr.com/p/national/education/top_mooc_provider_edx_no_longer_FooMSmV3LdSQHYGKND4LoI

14.

Downes

(2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Ottawa, ON: National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/files/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012.pdf

15.

Grainger

(2013). Massive open online course (MOOC) report. London, UK: University of London International Programmes. Retrieved from http://www.londoninternational.ac.uk

16.

Haggard

(2013). The maturing of the MOOC: Literature review of massive open online courses and other forms of online distance learning. London, UK: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

17.

Hart

(2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/11.1.2.pdf

18.

Hills

F. W.

(2010). An exploratory study of the impact of institutional policies and practices of community and technical colleges in Texas on student persistence in online courses. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

19.

A. D.

Reich

Nesterko

Seaton

D. T.

Mullaney

Waldo

Chuang

(2014). Harvard X and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University/MIT.

20.

Hossler

Gallagher

K. S.

(1987). Studying college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policy-makers. College and University, 2, 207–221.

21.

Jaggars

S. S.

Edgecombe

Stacey

G. W.

(2013). What we know about online course outcomes: Research overview. Community College Research Center, Columbia University, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/What-We-Know-About-Online-Course-Outcomes.pdf

22.

King

M. A.

(1972). Primary and secondary indicators of education. In Shonfield

Shaw

(Eds.), Social indicators and social policy (pp. 53–66). London, UK: Heinemann Educational Books.

23.

Kizilcec

R. F.

Piech

Schneider

(2013, April). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK’13, Leuven, Belgium.

24.

Koller

Chuong

Chen

(2013, May/June). Retention and intention in massive open online courses. Educause Review, pp. 62–63.

25.

Kuh

Kinzie

Bridges

B.K.

Hayek

J. C.

(2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.

26.

Landes

(2012, July 20). Tuition reimbursement: A benefit for some employees and employers. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/moneybuilder/2012/07/20/tuition-reimbursement-a-benefit-for-some-employees-and-employers/

27.

Lease

A. J.

Brown

T. A.

(2009). Distance learning past, present and future. International Journal of Instructional Media, 36, 415–426.

28.

McGuire

(2014). The best MOOC provider: A review of Coursera, Udacity, and edX. Retrieved from http://www.skilledup.com/blog/the-best-mooc-provider-a-review-of-coursera-udacity-and-edx/

29.

Moloney

J. F.

Oakley

(2010). Scaling online education: Increasing access to higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14, 55–70.

30.

MOOCs @ Edinburgh Group. (2013). MOOCS @ Edinburgh 2013, Report #1. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6683

31.

Moore

Shulock

Offenstein

(2009). Steps to success: Analyzing milestone achievement to improve community college student outcomes. Sacramento, CA: Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Policy.

32.

Noel-Levitz. (2011). National online learners priorities report. Coralville, IA: Author.

33.

Ochoa

E. M.

(2011). Guidance to institutions and accrediting agencies regarding a credit hour as defined in the final regulations published on October 29, 2010 (GEN-11-06). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education.

34.

Open University. (2014). Teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/about/main/strategy/teaching-learning-ou

35.

Perna

L. W.

Thomas

S. L.

(2008). Theoretical perspectives on student success: Understanding the contributions of the disciplines (ASHE-Higher Education Reader Report, Vol. 34, No 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

36.

Picciano

A. G.

(2012). Report on the evaluation of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation’s anytime, anyplace learning program. New York, NY: Sloan Consortium.

37.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2013). Letter to president Barak Obama on the development of massive open online courses. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_edit_dec-2013.pdf?dm_i=1ZJN,26IAK,E29F2Z,7VXSC,1

38.

Rhoads

(in press). MOOCs, high technology, and higher learning. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

39.

Rogers

(1962). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

40.

Simpson

(2013). Student retention in distance education: Are we failing our students. Open-Learning: The Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 28(2), 105–119.

41.

Stone

(1970). Mathematical models of the economy and other essays. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.

42.

Swan

(2003). Learning effectiveness online: What the research tells us. In Bourne

Moore

J. C.

(Eds.), Elements of quality online education, practice and direction (pp. 13–45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.

43.

Universities UK. (2013). Massive open online courses: Higher education’s digital moment? London, UK: Author. Retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk

Moving Through MOOCs

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References