AndersonC. W. (2003). How can schools support teaching for understanding in math and science? In GamoranA.AndersonC. W.QuirozP. A.SecadaW. G.WilliamsT.AshmannS. (Eds.), Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
2.
FredericksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisP. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
3.
HarackiewiczJ. M.PintrichP. R.BarronK. E.ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645.
4.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5.
NewmannF. W.WehlageG. G.LambornS. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In NewmannF. W. (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
ShernoffD. J.VandellD. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 891–903.
7.
VandellD. L.ShernoffD. J.PierceK. M.BoltD. M.DadismanK.BrownB. B. (2005). Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). New Directions for Youth Development, 105, 121–129.