Commentaries regarding appropriate methods for researching professional development have been a frequent topic in recent issues of Educational Researcher as well as other venues. In this article, the authors extend this discussion by observing that randomized trials of specific professional development programs have not enhanced our knowledge of effective program characteristics, leaving practitioners without guidance with regard to best practices. In response, the authors propose that scholars should execute more rigorous comparisons of professional development designs at the initial stages of program development and use information derived from these studies to build a professional knowledge base. The authors illustrate with examples of both a proposed study and reviews of evidence on key questions in the literature.
AngristJ. D.LavyV. (2001). Does teacher training affect pupil learning? Evidence from matched comparisons in Jerusalem public schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 343–369.
2.
ArensS. A.StokerG.BarkerJ.ShebbyS.WangX.CicchinelliL. F.WillamsM. J. (2012). Effects of curriculum and teacher professional development on the language proficiency of elementary English language learner students in the central region (NCEE 2012-4013). Denver, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
3.
BaumB. E.GrayJ. J. (1992). Expert modeling, self-observation using videotape, and acquisition of basic therapy skills. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 220–225.
4.
BorkoH. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
5.
BorkoH.StecherB. M.AlonzoA. C.MoncureS.McClamS. (2005). Artifact packages for characterizing classroom practice: A pilot study. Educational Assessment, 10, 73–104.
6.
BosJ. M.SanchezR. C.TsengF.RayyesN.OrtizL.SinicropeC. (2012). Evaluation of Quality Teaching for English Learners (QTEL) professional development (NCEE 2012-4005). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
7.
BushW. S.RonauR.BrownT. E.MyersM. H. (2006, April). Reliability and validity of diagnostic mathematics assessments for middle school teachers. Paper presented at the American Educational Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
8.
BuysseV.CastroD. C.Peisner-FeinbergE. (2010). Effects of a professional development program on classroom practices and outcomes for Latino dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 194–206.
9.
CabaloJ. V.MaB.JaciwA. (2007). Comparative effectiveness of professional development and support tools for world language instruction: A report on a randomized experiment in Delaware. Palo Alto, CA: Empirical Education Inc.
10.
CarlisleJ. F.KelceyB.RowanB.PhelpsG. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge about early reading: Effects on students’ gains in reading achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 289–321.
11.
CarpenterT. P.FennemaE.PetersonP. L.ChiangC. P.LoefM. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499–531.
12.
CohenD. K.HillH. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
DaehlerK. R.ShinoharaM. (2001). A complete circuit is a complete circle: Exploring the potential of case materials and methods to develop teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of science. Research in Science Education, 31, 267–288.
15.
DedeC.KetelhutD. J.WhitehouseP.BreitL.McCloskeyE. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 8–19.
16.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.
17.
ElmoreR. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1–27.
18.
FeuerM. J.TowneL.ShavelsonR. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14.
19.
FinklesteinN.HansenT.HuangC.- W.HirschmanB.HuangM. (2011). The effect of problem based economics on high school economics instruction (NCEE 2010-4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
20.
FisherJ. B.SchumakerJ. B.CulbertsonJ.DeshlerD. D. (2010). Effects of a computerized professional development program on teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 301–312.
21.
FishmanB.KonstantopoulosS.KubitskeyB. W.VathR.ParkG.JohnsonH.EdelsonD. C. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 426–438. doi:10.1177/0022487113494413
GaretM. S.CronenS.EatonM.KurkiA.LudwigM.JonesW.SztejnbergL. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE 2008-4030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
24.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
25.
GaretM. S.WayneA. J.StancavageF.TaylorJ.EatonM.WaltersK.DoolittleF. (2011). Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings after the second year of implementation (NCEE 2011-4025). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
26.
GerstenR.DiminoJ.JayanthiM.KimJ. S.SantoroL. E. (2010). Teacher study group: Impact of the professional development model on reading instruction and student outcomes in first grade classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 694–739.
27.
GoodT.GrouwsD.EbmeierH. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
28.
GrossmanP. L.LoebS.CohenJ.HammernessK.WyckoffJ. H.BoydD. J.LankfordH. (2010). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores (Working Paper 16015). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
29.
HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798–812.
30.
HawleyW. D.ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
HellerJ. I.DaehlerK. R.WongN.ShinoharaM.MiratrixL. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362.
32.
HillH. C.SchillingS. G.BallD. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30.
33.
Institute for Educational Sciences. (2012). Request for applications, education research grants (CFDA Number: 84.305A). Washington, DC: Author.
34.
JacobR.GoddardR.KimE.S. (n.d.). Assessing the use of aggregate data in the evaluation of school-based interventions: Implications for evaluation research and state policy regarding public use data. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35.
JacobB. A.LefgrenL. (2004). The impact of teacher training on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 50–79.
36.
KaiserA. (2011). Beginning teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the first through third waves of the 2007-08 Beginning Teacher Longitudinal Study (NCES 2011-318). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
37.
KennedyM. M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. NISE Brief, 3(2), 1–7.
38.
LandryS. H.AnthonyJ. L.SwankP. R.Monseque-BaileyP. (2009). Effectiveness of comprehensive professional development for teachers of at-risk preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 448–465.
39.
Learning Mathematics for Teaching Project. (2011). Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 25–47.
40.
MastersJ.De KramerR. M.O’DwyerL. M.DashS.RussellM. (2010). The effects of online professional development on fourth grade English Language Arts teachers’ knowledge and instructional practices. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43, 355–375.
41.
McCroryR.FlodenR.Ferrini-MundyJ.ReckaseM. D.SenkS. L. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43, 584–615.
42.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education, ShavelsonR.TowneL. Eds. Washington, DC: Committee on Scientific Principles for Educational Research, National Academy Press.
43.
NewmanD.FinneyP. B.BellS.TurnerH.JaciwA. P.ZacamyJ. L.GouldL. F. (2012). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Alabama Math, Science, and Technology Initiative (AMSTI) (NCEE 2012-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
44.
O’DwyerL. M.MasterJ.DashS.De KramerR. M.HumezA.RussellM. (2010). E-learning for educators: Effects of on-line professional development on teachers and their students: Findings from four randomized trials. Retrieved July 9, 2010, from http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/PDF/EFE_Findings2010_Report.pdf
45.
PenuelW. R.FishmanB. J.ChengB. H.SabelliN. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337.
46.
PenuelW. R.FishmanB. J.YamaguchiR.GallagherL. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958.
47.
PenuelW. R.GallagherL. P.MoorthyS. (2011). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in earth systems science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 996–1025.
48.
PowellD. R.DiamondK. E. (2011). Improving the outcomes of coaching-based professional development interventions. In NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 3, pp. 295–307). New York: Guilford.
49.
PowellD. R.DiamondK. E.BurchinalM. R.KoehlerM. J. (2010). Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on head start teachers and children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 299.
50.
RameyS. L.RameyC. T.CrowellN. A.GraceC.TimrazN. (in press). The dosage of professional development for early childhood professionals: How the amount, density, and duration of professional development may influence its effectiveness. In SutterbyJ. A. (Ed.), Early childhood professional development: Research and practice through the early childhood educator professional development grant. Boston: The Emerald Group.
51.
RussellM.CareyR.KleimanG.VenableJ. D. (2009). Face-to-face and online professional development for mathematics teachers: A comparative study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13, 71–87.
52.
RussellM.KleimanG.CareyR.DouglasJ. (2009). Comparing self-paced and cohort-based online courses for teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 443–466.
53.
SantagataR.AngeliciG. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 339–349.
54.
SantagataR.KerstingN.GivvinK. B.StiglerJ. W. (2011). Problem implementation as a lever for change: An experimental study of the effects of a professional development program on students’ mathematics learning. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 1–24.
55.
ScherL.O’ReillyF. (2009). Professional development for K–12 math and science teachers: What do we really know?Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(3), 209–249.
56.
SeidelT.StürmerK.BlombergG.KobargM.SchwindtK. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?Teaching & Teacher Education, 27, 259–267.
57.
SherinM. G.HanS. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching & Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
58.
SherinM. G.van EsE. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37.
59.
ShinoharaM.DaehlerK. R.HellerJ. L. (2004, April). Using a pedagogical content framework to determine the content of case-based teacher professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada.
60.
SmithS. P.BanilowerE. R. (2006, April). Measuring teachers’ knowledge for teaching force and motion concepts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
61.
SowderJ. T.PhilippR. A.ArmstrongB. E.SchappelleB. P. (1998). Middle-grade teachers’ mathematical knowledge and its relationship to instruction: A research monograph. Albany: State University of New York Press.
62.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
WayneA. J.YoonK. S.ZhuP.CronenS.GaretM. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479.
65.
YoonK. S.DuncanT.LeeS. W. Y.ScarlossB.ShapleyK. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
66.
ZhangM.LundebergM.KoehlerM. J.EberhardtJ. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 454–462.
