Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).
2.
ChubinD. E.DePassA. L.BlockusL. (Eds.). (2009). Understanding interventions that broaden participation in research careers: Embracing a breadth of purpose. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
3.
CollinsS. N.StanleyG. G.WarnerI. M.WatkinsS. F. (2001). What is Louisiana State doing right?Chemical and Engineering News, 79(50), 39–42.
4.
DePassA. L.ChubinD. E. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding interventions that encourage minorities to pursue research careers: Building a community of research and practice. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Cell Biology.
5.
DunnJ.WestM. (2008). Calculated justice: Education research and the courts. In HessF. M. (Ed.), When research matters: How scholarship influences education policy (pp. 155–176). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6.
Fisher v. University of Texas, 631 F.3d 213, (5th Cir. 2011), certiorari granted (No. 11-345).
7.
FoxM. F.SonnertG.NikiforovaI. (2009). Successful programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Adapting vs. adopting the institutional environment. Research in Higher Education, 50, 333–353.
8.
GarcesL. M. (2013). Understanding the impact of affirmative action bans in different graduate fields of study. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3102/0002831212470483
9.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
10.
Hopwood v. Texas, 78F.3d 932, (5th Cir. 1996), certiorari denied, 518 U.S. 1033 (1996).
11.
JolliffL.LeadleyJ.CoakleyE.SloaneR. A. (2012). Women in U.S. academic medicine and science: Statistics and benchmarking report 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
KurdakC. (2011, April). Best practices from the University of Michigan applied physics program to enhance diversity. Paper presented at April Meeting of the American Physical Society, Anaheim, CA. Abstract retrieved from http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2011.APR.L5.2
14.
MalcomS. M.Van HorneV. V.GaddyC. D.GeorgeY. S. (1998). Losing ground: Science and engineering graduate education of Black and Hispanic Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
15.
MargolisJ.FisherA. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16.
MatonK. I.HrabowskiF. A.III. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: A strengths-based approach. American Psychologist, 59, 547–556.
17.
MorganJ. M.PullinD. (2010). Social science and the courts: Challenges and strategies for bridging gaps between law and research. Educational Researcher, 39, 515–524.
18.
MosesM.MarinP. (2006). Informing the debate on race-conscious education policy. Educational Researcher, 35, 3–5.
19.
MulveyP. J.NicholsonS. (2012, September). Physics bachelor’s degrees: Results from the 2010 survey of enrollments and degrees. Focus On. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/physbach0910.pdf
20.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013 (NSF 13–304). Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
21.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No.1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
22.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
23.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) [Computer file]. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
WarnerI. M. (2006, September). Models for creating and sustaining diversity among undergraduate and graduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Paper presented at the 232nd American Chemical Society national meeting, San Francisco, CA.
25.
WolfL. K. (2011). Blueprint for boosting diversity. Chemical and Engineering News, 89(51), 41–42.
