In this article, I argue that Harvey Siegel correctly points out the limitations of epistemic diversity in educational research. Building from Siegel’s analysis, I argue that we need to move away from the language of epistemic diversity and to the language of epistemic injustice. Epistemic injustice allows us to do the work that epistemic diversity sets out to do—that is, creating more inclusive epistemic practices that lead to more accurate descriptions of the world—without leading to the untenable and unjustified conclusions that follow from using the language of epistemic diversity. Drawing on recent work in feminist epistemology, I describe epistemic injustice and argue for its significance. I conclude by drawing out the implications of epistemic injustice for educational researchers.
AndersonE. (1995). Feminist epistemology: An interpretation and a defense. Hypatia, 10(3), 50–84.
4.
AndersonE. (2006). The epistemology of democracy. Episteme, 3, 8–22.
5.
BrownL. M.Chesney-LindM.SteinN. (2007). Patriarchy matters: Towards a gendered theory of teen violence and victimization. Violence Against Women, 13, 1249–1273.
6.
CalhounC. (1989). Responsibility and reproach. Ethics, 99, 389-406.
7.
Cochran-SmithM. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 5–28.
8.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.
FrickerM. (2000). Pluralism without postmodernism. In FrickerM.HornsbyJ (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to feminism (pp. 146–165). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FrickerM. (2006). Powerlessness and social interpretation. Episteme, 3, 96-108.
13.
FrickerM. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
FrickerM. (2012). Silence and institutional prejudice. In CransowS.SupersonA. (Eds.), Out from the shadows: Analytical feminist contributions to traditional philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
GrasswickH. (2004). Individuals in communities. Hypatia, 19(3), 85-120.
16.
GruberJ. E.FineranS. (2008). Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents. Sex Roles, 59, 1–13.
17.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491.
19.
LeeV. E.CroningerR. G.LinnE.ChenX. (1996). The culture of sexual harassment in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 383–417.
20.
MasonR. (2011). Two types of unknowing. Hypatia, 26, 294–307.
21.
MeyerE. J. (2009). Gender, bullying, and harassment: Strategies to end sexism and homophobia in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
SiegelH. (1997). Rationality redeemed: Further dialogues on an educational ideal. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
SiegelH. (2006). Epistemological diversity and education research: Much ado about nothing much?Educational Researcher, 35(2), 3–12.
25.
SteinN. D.MennemeierK. A. (2011). Addressing the gendered dimensions of harassment and bullying: what domestic and sexual violence advocates need to know. Retrieved from www.vawnet.org
26.
TatumB. (1992). Talking about race, learning about racism: The applications of racial identity development theory. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 1–24.
27.
TatumB. (1994). Teaching White students about racism: The search for White allies and the restoration of hope. Teachers College Record, 95, 462–476.
28.
TatumB. (1997). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” and other conversations about the development of racial identity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 20–32.
