The present article responds briefly to the comments, in this issue of Educational Researcher, of Petrosino and of Robinson to the “Propagation of Misinformation About Frequencies of RFTs/RCTs in Education: A Cautionary Tale.” The authors emphasize that the context of how the quality of education research is perceived both within and outside the field creates the milieu for evaluating the ultimate impacts of misinformation about that quality. They note that related concerns have been detailed in various American Educational Research Association journal articles and in other reports for decades.
BerlinerD. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X03100801810.3102/0013189X031008018
2.
EisnerE. W. (1983). Anastasia might still be alive, but the monarchy is dead. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 13–14, 23-34. doi:10.2307/117513410.2307/1175134
3.
FettermanD. M. (1982). Ethnography in educational research: The dynamics of diffusion. Educational Researcher, 11(3), 17–22, 29. doi:10.2307/117587010.2307/1175870
4.
FeuerM. J.TowneL.ShavelsonR. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14. doi:10.3102/0013189X03100800410.3102/0013189X031008004
5.
GlassG. V (1979). Policy for the unpredictable (uncertainty research and policy). Educational Researcher, 8(9), 12–14. doi:10.2307/117590110.2307/1175901
6.
HallB. W.WardA. W.ComerC. B. (1988). Published educational research: An empirical study of its quality. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 182–189.
PetrosinoA. (2012). Reflections on “The Graph.”Educational Researcher, 41, 174–176.
9.
RobinsonD. H. (2012). The strange case of the changing graph: Much ado about nothing?Educational Researcher, 41, 171–173.
10.
RobinsonD. H.LevinJ. R.ThomasG. D.PituchK. A.VaughnS. (2007). The incidence of “causal” statements in teaching and learning research journals. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 400–413. doi:10.3102/000283120730217410.3102/0002831207302174
11.
ShavelsonR. J.TowneL. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.
ThompsonB. (2008). Standards in conducting and publishing research in education. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 21(1), 10–16. Retrieved from http://people.cehd.tamu.edu/~bthompson/mwera.htm
13.
VockellE. L.AsherW. (1974). Perceptions of document quality and use by educational decision makers and researchers. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 249–258. doi:10.3102/0002831201100324910.3102/00028312011003249
14.
WandtE.AdamsG. W.CollettD. M.MichaelW. B.RyansD. G.ShayC. B. (1965). An evaluation of educational research published in journals (Unpublished report of the Committee on Evaluation of Research). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15.
WardA. W.HallB. W.SchrammC. E. (1975). Evaluation of published educational research: A national survey. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 109–128. doi:10.3102/0002831201200210910.3102/00028312012002109
