This article takes issue with the notion that professional learning communities need to be more focused on teacher expertise through the use of online videos of lessons taught by expert teachers that are aligned with the Common Core State Standards. The authors argue that the use of externally developed, research-based, and standards-aligned videos violates the principles of authentic inquiry that underlie professional learning communities. They also caution that a profit-seeking education industry is increasingly behind the promotion of evidence-based products.
BausmithJ.BarryC. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 40(4), 175–178.
5.
BiestaG. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
6.
BurchP. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York: Routledge.
7.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
CurryM. W. (2008). Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers College Record, 110(4), 733–774.
FeldmanA.WeissT. (2010). Understanding change in teachers’ ways of being through collaborative action research: A cultural historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29–55.
12.
FernandezC.YoshidaM. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Routledge.
13.
GlassR. D.NygreenK. (2011). Class, race and the discourse of “college for all.” A response to “Schooling for Democracy.”Democracy and Education, 19(1). Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/
14.
HerrK.AndersonG. (2008). Teacher research and learning communities: A failure to theorize power relations?Language Arts, 85(5), 382–391.
15.
JohnsonR.Avelar La SalleR. (2010). The wallpaper effect: Data strategies to uncover and eliminate hidden inequalities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16.
McLaughlinM. (1976). Implementation as mutual adaptation: Change in classroom organization. Teachers College Record, 77(3), 339–351.
17.
MeansB.ChenE.DebargerA.PadillaC. (2011, February). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
18.
OstermanK.KottkampR. (2004). Reflective practice for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
PayneC. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20.
SabatierP. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 21–48.
21.
SomekhB. (2010). The Collaborative Action Research Network: 30 years of agency in developing educational action research. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 103–121.
22.
StollL.BolamR.McMahonA.WallaceM.ThomasS. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.
23.
StotskyS.WurmanZ. (2010). Common Core’s standards still don’t make the grade: Why Massachusetts and California must regain control over their academic destinies (White Paper No. 65). Retrieved from the Pioneer Institute website: http://www.pioneerinstitute.org/pdf/common_core_standards.pdf
24.
ThibodeauG. M. (2008). A content literacy collaborative study group: High school teachers take charge of their professional learning. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(1), 54–64.
25.
WaymanJ.SpringfieldS. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 549–571.
26.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
27.
WilsonN. (2008). Teachers expanding pedagogical content knowledge: Learning about formative assessment together. Journal of In-Service Education, 34(3), 283–298.
