This commentary on Porter, McMaken, Hwang, and Yang’s “Common Core Standards: The New U.S. Intended Curriculum,” which finds a lack of alignment between the Common Core State Standards and state standards and assessments, suggests possible reasons for the lack of alignment. It also offers possible reasons for Porter et al.’s finding of a lack of focus in the standards. It raises questions about the use of a cognitive-processing framework for conducting content analysis of the standards.
BaynhamM.PrinslooM. (Eds.). (2009). The future of literacy studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BeachR.Haertling-TheinA.WebbA. (2011). Exceeding the 6–12 English language arts Common Core State Standards: Teaching English language arts as literacy practices. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
BeckM. D. (2007). Review and other views: “Alignment” as a psychometric issue. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 127–135.
6.
BloomeD.CarterS.ChristianB.OttoS.Shuart-FarisN. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Center for K–12 Assessment & Performance Management. (2010). Together to raise achievement: New assessments for the Common Core State Standards. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
DavidsonC. (2010). The future of thinking: Learning institutions in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
FanettiS.BushrowK. M.DeWeeseD. L. (2010). Closing the gap between high school writing instruction and college writing expectations. English Journal, 99(4), 77–83.
12.
GeeJ. P. (2010). A situated-sociocultural approach to literacy and technology. In BakerE. (Ed.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 165–193). New York: Guilford.
13.
GutiérrezK. D.MoralesP. Z.MartinezD. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33, 213–245.
HillocksG. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
KennedyM. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598.
17.
KiuharaS. A.GrahamS.HawkenL. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101,136–160.
18.
KoberN.RentnerD. S. (2011). States’ progress and challenges in implementing Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Center on Educational Policy. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?DocumentTopicID=1
19.
LunsfordK. (2002). Contextualizing Toulmin’s model in the writing classroom: A case study. Written Communication, 19(1), 109–174.
20.
MartoneA.SireciS. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 19(9), 11–16.
McCurryD. (2010). Can machine scoring deal with broad and open writing tests as well as human readers?Assessing Writing, 15(2), 118–129.
23.
MullisI. V. S.MartinM. O.KennedyA. M.FoyP. (2006). PIRLS 2006 international report. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
24.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). 2002 Educational Longitudinal Study: Second follow-up, 2006. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
NeuendorfK. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
NewellG. E.BeachR.SmithJ.VanDerHeideJ. (in press). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing in educational contexts: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly.
27.
PennycookA. (2010). Language as a local practice. New York: Routledge.
28.
PorterA.McMakenJ.HwangJ.YangR. (2011). Common Core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103–116.
29.
PorterA. C.SmithsonJ.BlankR.ZeidnerT. (2007). Alignment as a teacher variable. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 27–51.
30.
ResnickL. B.RothmanR.SlatteryJ. B.VranekJ. L. (2004). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing. Educational Assessment, 9(1-2), 1–27.
31.
RothmanR. (2003). Imperfect matches: The alignment of standards and tests. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
32.
ShepardL. A. (2010). What the marketplace has brought us: Item-by-item teaching with little instructional insight. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(2), 246–257.
33.
StreetB. V. (2005). Literacies across educational contexts: Mediating learning and teaching. Philadelphia: Caslon Publishing.
34.
ThomasD.BrownJ. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Published by the authors.
35.
TienkenC. H. (2008). Rankings of international achievement test performance and economic strength: Correlation or conjecture?International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(4), 1–15.
36.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. (2010). ESEA blueprint for reform. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
WigginsG. (2011). A diploma worth having. Educational Leadership, 68(6), 28–33.
