The Common Core standards released in 2010 for English language arts and mathematics have already been adopted by dozens of states. Just how much change do these new standards represent, and what is the nature of that change? In this article, the Common Core standards are compared with current state standards and assessments and with standards in top-performing countries, as well as with reports from a sample of teachers from across the country describing their own practices.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English Language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
GamoranA.PorterA. C.SmithsonJ.WhiteP. A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 325–338.
4.
KleinS. P.HamiltonL. S.McCaffreyD. F.StecherB. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 49.
5.
MartoneA.SireciS. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 19(9), 11–16.
6.
MayerD. P. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 29–45.
PolikoffM. S.PorterA. C.SmithsonJ. (in press). How well aligned are state assessments of student achievement with state content standards?American Educational Research Journal.
9.
PorterA. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.
10.
PorterA. C.KirstM. W.OsthoffE. J.SmithsonJ. L.SchneiderS. A. (1993). Reform up close: An analysis of high school mathematics and science classrooms. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
11.
PorterA. C.PolikoffM. S.SmithsonJ. (2009). Is there a de facto national intended curriculum? Evidence from state content standards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 238–268.
12.
PorterA. C.PolikoffM. S.ZeidnerT.SmithsonJ. (2008). The quality of content analyses of state student achievement tests and state content standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(4), 2–14.
13.
RossJ. A.McDougallD.Hogaboam-GrayA.LeSageA. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers’ implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 344–363.
14.
SchmidtW. H.McKnightC. C.HouangR. T.WangH. C.WileyD. E.CoganL. S.. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
WebbN. L. (2005). Alignment analysis of mathematics standards and assessments, Michigan High School. Madison, WI: Author.
16.
WebbN. L. (2006). Alignment analysis of mathematics standards and assessments, Tennessee Grades 3–9. Madison, WI: Author.
