The lecture has been much maligned as a pedagogical form, yet it persists and even flourishes today in the form of the podcast, the TED talk, and the “smart” lecture hall. This article examines the lecture as a pedagogical genre, as “a site where differences between media are negotiated” (Franzel) as these media coevolve. This examination shows the lecture as bridging oral communication with writing and newer media technologies, rather than as being superseded by newer electronic and digital forms. The result is a remarkably adaptable and robust genre that combines textual record and ephemeral event, and that is capable of addressing a range of different demands and circumstances, both practical and epistemological.
BlairA. (2008). Student manuscript and the textbook. In CampiE.De AngelisS.GoeingA.-S.GraftonA. T. (Eds.), Scholarly knowledge: Textbooks in early modern Europe (pp. 39–74). Geneva, Switzerland: Droz.
2.
BöhmeJ. (2006). Schule am Ende der Buchkultur. Medientheoretische Begründungen schulischer Bildungsarchitekturen [School at the end of the culture of the book: A media-theoretical basis for school pedagogy]. Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.
3.
BoudinhonA. (1909). Glosses, glossaries, glossarists. In The Catholic encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton. Retrieved from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06588a.htm
BriggsA.BurkeP. (2009). A social history of the media: From Gutenberg to the Internet (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
6.
ClarkW. (2006). Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
de SaussureF. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
8.
DeweyJ. (1969). Lectures vs. recitations: A symposium. In The Early Works of John Dewey: 1882–1898 (p. 147). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
9.
EhrlichA. (1977). Fichte als Redner. [Fichte as a Speaker]. Munich: tuduv-Verlagsgesellschaft.
10.
EisensteinE. L. (1997). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
ForemanJ. (2003, July/August). Next-generation educational technology versus the lecture. EDUCAUSE Review, pp. 13–22.
12.
FranzelS. (2010). The lecture: A case study in the intermediality of academic instruction. In FriesenN.CavellR. (Eds.), Media transatlantic: Media theory in North America and German-speaking Europe [Conference program] (pp. 35–36). Retrieved from http://www.mediatrans.ca/final_conference_program.pdf
13.
GadamerH. G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). New York: Continuum.
14.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
15.
GoffmanE. (1981). On the lecture. In Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16.
HajnalI. (1954). L’Enseignement de l’écriture aux universités médiévales [Teaching writing in medieval universities]. Budapest, Hungary: Académie des Sciences de Hongrie.
JonesS. E. (2007). Reflections on the lecture: Outmoded medium or instrument of inspiration?Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 397–406.
19.
KingA. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41, 30–35.
20.
KittlerF. (1990). Discourse networks, 1800/1900. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
LacanJ. (2007). The ethics of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan. London: Routledge.
22.
LaurillardD. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
23.
LaurillardD. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
24.
McLuhanM. (1960a). Classroom without walls. In CarpenterE.McLuhanM. (Eds.), Explorations in communication (pp. 1–3). Boston: Beacon.
25.
McLuhanM. (1960b). Five sovereign fingers tax the breath. In CarpenterE.McLuhanM. (Eds.), Explorations in communication (pp. 207–208). Boston: Beacon.
26.
McLuhanM. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27.
McLuhanM. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
MortonA. (2009). Lecturing to large groups. In FryH.KetteridgeS.MarshallS. (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 58–71). London: Routledge.
29.
OngW. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.
SchleiermacherF. D. E. (1998). Hermeneutics and criticism and other writings (BowieA., Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
VergerJ. (2000). Lecture. In DobsonR. B. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages (Vol. 2, p. 836). London: Routledge.
33.
WieruszowskiH. (1966). The medieval university. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
34.
WittgensteinL. (2001). Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935. From the Notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret Macdonald. New York: Prometheus Books.
