The authors analyze national data on recent college matriculants to investigate gender and racial/ethnic disparities in STEM fields, with an eye toward the role of academic preparation and attitudes in shaping such disparities. Results indicate that physical science/engineering (PS/E) majors are dominated by men, but not, however, disproportionately by White men. After accounting for high school preparation, the odds of declaring a PS/E major are two times greater for Black males than for White males, and Black females are closer than White females to closing the gap with White males. The authors find virtually no evidence that math attitudes contribute to disparities in choice of a PS/E major. Finally, in contrast to PS/E fields, biological sciences draw relatively equitably from all groups.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2004). Under the microscope: A decade of gender equity projects in the sciences. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AndersonE.KimD. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. Washington, DC: American Council of Education.
4.
BerendsM.LucasS. R.PenalozaR. V. (2008). How changes in families and schools are related to trends in Black–White test scores. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 314–344.
5.
BlickenstaffJ. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.
6.
BuchmannC.DiPreteT. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 515–541.
7.
BuckG.ClarkV.Leslie-PeleckyD.LuY.Cerda-LizarragaP. (2008). Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707.
8.
BystydzienskiJ.BirdS. (Eds.). (2006). Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
CatsambisS. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 243–257.
10.
ChenX. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES No. 2009-161). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
11.
ChipmanS. F.BrushL. R.WilsonD. M. (Eds.). (1985). Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
ColeD.EspinozaA. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300.
13.
CorrellS. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Ed Leadership, 58, 12–17.
15.
EcclesJ. S. (1994). Understanding women’s education and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.
16.
EisenhartM.FinkelE. (1998). Women’s science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
HansonS. L. (2006). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. In BystydzienskiJ.BirdS. (Eds.), Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA. (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors. Los Angeles: Cooperative Institutional Research Program.
19.
HiltonT. L.LeeV. E. (1988). Student interest and persistence in science: Changes in the educational pipeline in the last decade. Journal of Higher Education, 59(5), 510–526.
20.
HydeJ.LindbergS.LinnM.EllisA.WilliamsC. (2008, July25). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science Magazine, pp. 494–495.
21.
HydeJ.LinnM. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599–600.
22.
JencksC.PhillipsM. (1998). The Black–White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
23.
LeslieL. L.McClureG. T.OaxacaR. L. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering—A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education, 69(3), 239–276.
24.
MoodC. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.
25.
MullerP. A.StageF. K.KinzieJ. (2001). Science achievement growth trajectories: Understanding factors related to gender and racial–ethnic differences in precollege science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 981–1012.
26.
National Academy of Sciences. (2007a). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
27.
National Academy of Sciences. (2007b). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
28.
National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004 (NSB No. 04-01). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
29.
OakesJ. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16, 153–222.
30.
Riegle-CrumbC. (2006). The path through math: Course-taking trajectories and student performance at the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 101–122.
31.
Riegle-CrumbC.FarkasG.MullerC. (2006). The role of gender and friendship in advanced course taking. Sociology of Education, 79(3), 206–228.
32.
RosserS. V. (1997). Re-engineering female friendly science. New York: Teachers College Press.
33.
SchneiderB.MartinezS.OwensA. (2006). Barriers to educational opportunities for Hispanics in the United States. In TiendaM.MitchellF. (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academies Press.
34.
SeymourE.HewittN. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
SimonR.FarkasG. (2008). Sex, class, and physical science educational attainment: Portions due to achievement versus recruitment. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14(3), 30–46.
36.
SmythF. L.McArdleJ. J. (2004). Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice. Research in Higher Education, 45(4), 353–381.
37.
TaiR.LiuC. Q.MalteseA. V.FanX. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144.
38.
TateW. F. (1997). Race–ethnicity, SES, gender and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.
39.
XieY.ShaumanK. A. (2003). Women in science career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
40.
ZeldinA. L.BritnerS. L.PajaresF. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036–1058.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
