Many of the methodological criticisms of the National Early Literacy Panel (NELP) report presented in this special issue of Educational Researcher are not specific to the NELP report but are in fact broad criticisms of much of the quantitative research on early literacy. This rejoinder demonstrates that these criticisms are off target and are based on a misunderstanding of the basic statistical assumptions employed in early literacy research. These assumptions are explained in this rejoinder, with the conclusion that quantitative research on early literacy rests on a strong statistical foundation.
BonettD. G. (2008). Meta-analytic confidence intervals for bivariate correlations. Psychological Methods, 13, 173–189.
2.
BonettD. G. (2009). Meta-analytic confidence intervals for standardized and unstandardized mean differences. Psychological Methods, 14, 225–238.
3.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455.
4.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. F. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104–111.
5.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 488–503.
DickinsonD. K.GolinkoffR. M.Hirsh-PasekK. K. (2010). Speaking out for language: Why language is central to reading development. Educational Researcher, 39, 305–310.
8.
GuilfordJ. (1936). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
HavlicekL. L.PetersonN. (1977). Effect of the violation of the assumptions upon significance levels of the Pearson r. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 373–377.
10.
HaysW. L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
11.
LoniganC. J. (2006). Conceptualizing phonological processing skills in prereaders. In DickinsonD. K.NeumanS. B. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (2nd ed., pp. 77–89). New York: Guilford.
12.
LoniganC. J. (2007). Vocabulary development and the development of phonological awareness skills in preschool children. In WagnerR. K.MuseA. E.TannenbaumK. R. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 15–31). New York: Guilford.
13.
LoniganC. J.ShanahanT. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: Things we know we know and things we know we don’t know. Educational Researcher, 39, 340–346.
14.
LoniganC. J.WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. (2007). Test of Preschool Early Literacy. Austin, TX: ProEd.
15.
MuellerR. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL. New York: Springer-Verlag.
16.
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
17.
ParisS. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202.
18.
ParisS. G.CarpenterR. D.ParisA. H.HamiltonE. E. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children’s reading comprehension. In ParisS. G.StahlS. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
ParisS. G.LuoS. W. (2010). Confounded statistical analyses hinder interpretation of the NELP report. Educational Researcher, 39, 316–322.
20.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
