A growing body of research showing that grade retention serves as an educationally low-quality placement has raised increasing concerns about whether the use of standardized tests in making decisions concerning grade retention conforms to current standards for appropriate and nondiscriminatory test use. This article examines the extent to which test-based grade retention policies comply with standards for fair and appropriate test use based on norms established by the professional testing community. The results of the investigation indicate that test-based retention policies potentially violate several of the professional standards. The points of violation are presented, and the implications for test-based retention policies are discussed.
AbediJ. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometric issues. Educational Assessment, 8, 231–257.
2.
AbidinR. R.GolladyW. M.HowertonA. L. (1971). Elementary school retention: An unjustifiable, discriminatory and noxious educational policy. Journal of School Psychology, 9, 410–417.
3.
AlexanderK. L.EntwisleD. R.DauberS. L. (2003). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AllensworthE. M. (2005). Dropout rates after high-stakes testing in elementary school: A study of the contradictory effects of Chicago’s efforts to end social promotion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 341–364.
5.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bester v. Tuscaloosa City Board of Education, 722 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir. 1984).
8.
Brooks-GunnJ.GuoG.FurstenbergF. F. (1993). Who drops out of and who continues beyond high school? A 20-year follow-up of Black urban youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 271–294.
9.
BuckendahlC. W.HuntR. (2005). Whose rules? The relation between the “rules” and the “law” of testing. In PhelpsR. P. (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 147–158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
ByrnesD. A. (1989). Attitudes of students, parents, and educators toward repeating a grade. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 108–131). Philadelphia: Falmer.
11.
CoffieldW. H.BlommersP. (1956). Effects of non-promotion on educational achievement in the elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 235–250.
12.
ColemanA. L. (1998). Excellence and equity in education: High standards for high-stakes tests. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 6, 81–113.
13.
Darling-HammondL. (1998). Alternatives to grade retention. School Administrator, 55(7), 18–23.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California’s public schools. Teacher’s College Record, 106, 1936–1966.
15.
Debra P. v. Turlington, 474 F. Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979); 564 F. Supp. 177 (M.D. Fla. 1983).
16.
DennebaumJ. M.KulbergJ. M. (1994). Kindergarten retention and transition classrooms: Their relationship to achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 5–12.
17.
DurlingJ. P. (1984). Testing the tests: The due process implications of minimum competency testing. New York University Law Review, 59, 577–632.
18.
ElamS. M. (1990). The 22nd annual Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 41–54.
19.
Erik V. v. Causby, 977 F. Supp. 384 (E.D. N.C. 1997).
20.
FergusonP. C. (1991). Longitudinal outcome differences among promoted and transitional at-risk kindergarten students. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 139–146.
GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency, 87 F. Supp. 2d 667 (W.D. Tex. 2000).
24.
GottfredsonD. C.FinkC. M.GrahamN. (1994). Grade retention and problem behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 761–784.
25.
GrissomJ. B.ShepardL. A. (1989). Repeating and dropping out of school. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 34–63). Philadelphia: Falmer.
26.
HagborgW. J.MasellaG.PalladinoP.ShepardsonJ. (1991). A follow-up study of high school students with a history of grade retention. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 310–317.
27.
HeubertJ. P. (1999). Nondiscriminatory use of high-stakes tests: Combining professional test-use standards with federal civil-rights enforcement. Educational Law Reporter, 133, 17–33.
28.
HeubertJ. P. (2002/2003). First, do no harm. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 26–30.
29.
HeubertJ. P.HauserR. M. (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30.
HolmesC. T. (1989). Grade level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 16–33). Philadelphia: Falmer.
31.
HolmesC. T. (2006). Low test scores + high retention rates = more dropouts. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(2), 56–58.
32.
HolmesC. T.MatthewsK. M. (1984). The effects of nonpromotion on elementary and junior high school pupils: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 54, 225–236.
33.
HongG.RaudenbushS. W. (2005). Effects of kindergarten retention policy on children’s cognitive growth in reading and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 205–224.
34.
HouseE. R. (1989). Policy implications of retention. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 202–213). Philadelphia: Falmer.
35.
JacksonG. B. (1975). The research evidence on the effects of grade retention. Review of Educational Research, 45, 613–635.
36.
JanoszM.LeBlancM.BoulericeB.TremblayR. E. (1997). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test on two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 733–762.
37.
JimersonS. R. (1999). On the failure of failure: Examining the association between early grade retention and education and employment outcomes during late adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 37(3), 243–272.
38.
JimersonS. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420–437.
39.
JimersonS. R.AndersonG. E.WhippleA. D. (2002). Winning the battle and losing the war: Examining the relation between grade retention and dropping out of high school. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 441–457.
40.
JimersonS. R.CarlsonE.RotertM.EgelandB.SroufeL. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 3–25.
41.
JimersonS. R.FergusonP. (2007). A longitudinal study of grade retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes of retained students through adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 314–339.
42.
JohnsonE. R.MerrellK. W.StoverL. (1990). The effects of early grade retention on the academic achievement of fourth-grade students. Psychology in the Schools, 27, 333–338.
43.
Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2004). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
Larry P. v. Riles, 495 F. Supp. 926, (N.D. Cal. 1979); aff’d, 793 F.2d 969 (9th Cir. 1984).
45.
LarsenD. E.AkmalT. T. (2007). Making decisions in the dark: Disconnects between retention research and middle-level practice. NASSP Bulletin, 91, 33–56.
46.
LeeJ. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3–12.
47.
LevinH. M. (2009). The economic payoff to investing in educational justice. Educational Researcher, 38, 5–20.
48.
LloydD. N. (1978). Prediction of school failure from third-grade data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 1193–1200.
49.
LuykxA.LeeO.MahotiereM.LesterB.HartJ.DeaktorR. (2007). Cultural and home language influences on children’s responses to science assessments. Teachers College Record, 109, 897–926.
50.
MantzicopoulosP.MorrisonD. (1992). Kindergarten retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes through the end of second grade. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 182–198.
51.
McCombs-ThomasA.ArmisteadL.KemptonT.LynchS.ForehandR.NousiainenS.NeighborsB.TannenbaumL. (1992). Early retention: Are there long-term beneficial effects?Psychology in the Schools, 29, 342–347.
52.
McCoyA. R.ReynoldsA. J. (1999). Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 273–298.
53.
MeiselsS. J.LiawF.-R. (1993). Failure in grade: Do retained students catch up?Journal of Educational Research, 87, 69–77.
54.
MitchellD. E.EncarnationD. J. (1984). Alternative state policy mechanisms for influencing school performance. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 4–11.
55.
MurphyJ. (1990). The educational reform movement of the 1980s: A comprehensive analysis. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases (pp. 3–55). Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
56.
NasonR. B. (1991). Retaining children: Is it the right decision?Childhood Education, 67, 300–304.
57.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2003). Position statement on student grade retention and social promotion. Bethesda, MD: Author.
58.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative of educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59.
NiklasonL. B. (1984). Nonpromotion: A pseudoscientific solution. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 485–499.
60.
NiklasonL. B. (1987). Do certain groups of children profit from grade retention?Psychology in the Schools, 24, 339–345.
61.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110.
62.
O’NeillP. T. (2003). High stakes testing law and litigation. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 623–662.
63.
PetersB. G. (2007). American public policy: Promise and performance (7th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
64.
PetersonP. L. (1989). Alternatives to student retention: New images of the learner, the teacher, and classroom learning. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 174–201). Philadelphia: Falmer.
65.
PetersonS. E.DeGracieJ. S.AyabeC. R. (1987). A longitudinal study of the effects of retention/promotion on academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 107–118.
66.
PhelpsL.DowdellN.RizzoF. G.EhrlichP.WilczenskiF. (1992). Five to ten years after placement: The long-term efficacy of retention and pre-grade transition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 116–123.
67.
PhillipsS. E. (2000). GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency: Psychometric evidence. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 343–385.
68.
PhillipsS. E.CamaraW. J. (2006). Legal and ethical issues. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed.; pp. 733–755). Westport, CT: Praeger.
69.
PiersonL. H.ConnellJ. P. (1992). Effect of grade retention on self-system processes, school engagement, and academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 300–307.
70.
ReynoldsA. J. (1992). Grade retention and school adjustment: An explanatory analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 101–121.
71.
RoderickM. (1994). Grade retention and school dropout: Investigating the association. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 729–759.
72.
RoderickM.JacobB.BrykA. S. (2002). The impact of high-stakes testing in Chicago on student achievement in promotional gate grades. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 333–357.
73.
RoderickM.NagaokaJ. (2005). Retention under Chicago’s high-stakes testing program: Helpful, harmful, or harmless?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 309–340.
74.
RothsteinR. (1998). Where is Lake Wobegon, anyway?Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 195–198.
75.
RumbergerR. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583–625.
76.
RumbergerR. W.GandaraP. (2004). Seeking equity in the education of California’s English learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 2032–2056.
77.
RustJ. O.WallaceK. A. (1993). Effects of grade level retention for four years. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 162–166.
78.
Sandlin v. Johnson, 643 F.2d 1027 (4th Cir. 1981).
79.
ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (1988). Escalating academic demand in kindergarten: Counterproductive policies. Elementary School Journal, 89(2), 135–145.
80.
ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (1989). Introduction and overview. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 1–15). Philadelphia: Falmer.
81.
ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (1990). Synthesis of research on grade retention. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 84–88.
82.
SidgwickH. (1907). The methods of ethics (7th ed.). London: MacMillan.
83.
SmithM. L. (1989). Teachers’ beliefs about retention. In ShepardL. A.SmithM. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 132–150). Philadelphia: Falmer.
84.
SmithM. L.ShepardL. A. (1988). Kindergarten readiness and retention: A qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs and practices. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 307–333.
85.
Solano-FloresG.Nelson-BarberS. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 553–573.
86.
Solano-FloresG.TrumbullE. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3–13.
87.
StroupA. L.RobinsL. N. (1972). Elementary school predictors of high school dropout among Black males. Sociology of Education, 45, 212–222.
88.
TannerC. K.CombsF. E. (1993). Student retention policy: The gap between research and practice. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8, 69–77.
89.
TannerC. K.GalisS. A. (1997). Student retention: Why is there a gap between the majority of research findings and school practice?Psychology in the Schools, 34, 107–114.
90.
Texas Education Agency. (2007). 2007 Comprehensive annual report on Texas public schools (Document No. GE08 601 04). Austin, TX: Author.
91.
TomchinE. M.ImparaJ. C. (1992). Unraveling teachers’ beliefs about grade retention. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 199–223.
92.
XiaC.GlennieE. (2005). Cost-benefit analysis of grade retention. Durham, NC: Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University.
93.
ZwickR. (2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
