Efficiency-Equity Tradeoffs in Schools: Evidence from Elementary School Learning

Abstract

School organizational decisions on resources and priorities shape the provision and distribution of learning opportunities, potentially creating conflicts between efficiency and equity. We evaluated this organizational efficiency-equity tradeoff hypothesis with statewide administrative data on elementary school students from one western state. We used value-added models of student achievement to generate annual estimates of schools’ (a) overall effectiveness in promoting learning and (b) differential effectiveness in promoting more learning for low-income students relative to higher-income peers, and we explored the relationship between them. We found meaningful variability in differential effectiveness and a clear negative association between overall and differential effectiveness, but one that is sensitive to context. This implies that efficiency-equity tradeoffs are a common but not inevitable feature of school practice as educators balance diverse organizational goals.

Keywords

school effectiveness equity socioeconomic status (SES)tradeoffs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499

Angrist

Hull

Pathak

P. A.

Walters

(2024). Credible school value-added with undersubscribed school lotteries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 106(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01149

Anyon

(1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748016200106

Arum

(2000). Schools and communities: Ecological and institutional dimensions. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.395

Atteberry

A. C.

McEachin

A. J.

(2020). Not where you start, but how much you grow: An addendum to the Coleman Report. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20940304

Barr

Dreeben

(1983). How schools work. University of Chicago Press.

Behrman

J. R.

Birdsall

(1988). The equity-productivity tradeoff: Public school resources in Brazil. European Economic Review, 32(8), 1585–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90019-0

Bidwell

C. E.

(2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673256

Bloom

H. S.

Hill

C. J.

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072

10.

Bourdieu

Passeron

J. C.

(1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.

11.

Bowles

Gintis

(1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.

12.

Brighouse

Ladd

H. F.

Loeb

Swift

(2018). Educational goods: Values, evidence, and decision-making. University of Chicago Press.

13.

Bryk

A. S.

Schneider

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.

14.

Calarco

J. M.

(2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. Oxford University Press.

15.

Calarco

J. M.

(2020). Avoiding us versus them: How schools’ dependence on privileged “helicopter” parents influences enforcement of rules. American Sociological Review, 85(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420905793

16.

Carbonaro

Lee

Langenkamp

A. G.

(2024). Racial inequality in 8th-grade math course-taking: Between-school inequality, local achievement queues, and course placements. American Sociological Review, 89(6), 1011–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224241289935

17.

Chingos

M. M.

Blagg

(2017). Do poor kids get their fair share of school funding? Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/do-poor-kids-get-their-fair-share-school-funding

18.

Coburn

C. E.

(2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302

19.

Cohen

D. K.

(2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Harvard University Press.

20.

Cohen

D. K.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Ball

D. L.

(2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119

21.

Daw

(2015). Explaining the persistence of health disparities: Social stratification and the efficiency-equity trade-off in the kidney transplantation system. American Journal of Sociology, 120(6), 1595–1640. https://doi.org/10.1086/681961

22.

Deming

D. J.

(2014). Using school choice lotteries to test measures of school effectiveness. American Economic Review, 104(5), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.406

23.

Diehl

D. K.

Golann

J. W.

(2023). An integrated framework for studying how schools respond to external pressures. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x231159599

24.

DiMaggio

P. J.

Powell

W. W.

(1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

25.

Domina

Penner

(2017). Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053354

26.

Downey

D. B.

Condron

D. J.

(2016). Fifty years since the Coleman Report: Rethinking the relationship between schools and inequality. Sociology of Education, 89(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040716651676

27.

Downey

D. B.

Quinn

D. M.

Alcaraz

(2019). The distribution of school quality: Do schools serving mostly white and high-SES children produce the most learning? Sociology of Education, 92(4), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719870683

28.

Downey

D. B.

Von Hippel

P. T.

Hughes

(2008). Are “failing” schools really failing? Using seasonal comparison to evaluate school effectiveness. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 242–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070808100302

29.

Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, 20 USC § 6301 (2015). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177/text

30.

Frank

K. A.

Maroulis

Duong

Kelcey

(2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin's causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713493129

31.

Handel

D. V.

Hanushek

E. A.

(2023). U.S. school finance: Resources and outcomes. In Hanushek

E. A.

Machin

Woessmann

(Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 7, pp. 143–226). Elsevier.

32.

Hanselman

Fiel

J. E.

(2017). School opportunity hoarding? Racial segregation and access to high growth schools. Social Forces, 95(3), 1077–1104. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow088

33.

Hanselman

Domina

Hwang

(2022). Educational inequality regimes amid Algebra-for-All: The provision and allocation of expanding educational opportunities. Social Forces, 100(4), 1722–1751. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab052

34.

Jackson

C. K.

(2018). What do test scores miss? The importance of teacher effects on non–test score outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 126(5), 2072–2107. https://doi.org/10.1086/699018

35.

Jackson

C. K.

Mackevicius

C. L.

(2024). What impacts can we expect from school spending policy? Evidence from evaluations in the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 16(1), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20220279

36.

Jacob

B. A.

Lefgren

(2005). Principals as agents: Subjective performance measurement in education (NBER Working Paper No. 11463). National Bureau of Economic Research.

37.

Jang

Reardon

S. F.

(2019). States as sites of educational (in)equality: State contexts and the socioeconomic achievement gradient. AERA Open, 5(3), 2332858419872459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872459

38.

Jencks

(1988). Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal? Ethics, 98(3), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1086/292969

39.

Jennings

J. L.

Deming

Jencks

Lopuch

Schueler

B. E.

(2015). Do differences in school quality matter more than we thought? New evidence on educational opportunity in the twenty-first century. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714562006

40.

Kim

Lee

(2020). Measuring teacher effectiveness for equity: Value-added model of teachers’ distributive effects on classroom achievement gaps. Educational Research and Evaluation, 26(1–2), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.1906708

41.

Koedel

Mihaly

Rockoff

J. E.

(2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.006

42.

Labaree

D. F.

(1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163342

43.

Lareau

(1989). Family-school relationships: A view from the classroom. Educational Policy, 3(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904889003003004

44.

Lewis

A. E.

Diamond

J. B.

(2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.

45.

Lipsky

(1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.

46.

Loeb

Soland

Fox

(2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714527788

47.

Matheny

K. T.

Thompson

M. E.

Townley-Flores

Reardon

S. F.

(2023). Uneven progress: Recent trends in academic performance among US school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 60(3), 447–485. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221134769

48.

Meyer

J. W.

Rowan

(1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

49.

Michelmore

Dynarski

(2017). The gap within the gap: Using longitudinal data to understand income differences in educational outcomes. AERA Open, 3(1), 2332858417692958. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417692958

50.

Naven

(2020). Within-school heterogeneity in quality: Do schools provide equal value added to all students?https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EQHuJ0OIIGPAx8XUoalwUV2sf4g71FEB/view

51.

Okun

A. M.

(1975). Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff. Brookings Institution Press.

52.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.

53.

Rabe-Hesketh

Skrondal

(2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press.

54.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Eschmann

R. D.

(2015). Does schooling increase or reduce social inequality? Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043406

55.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Willms

(1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986020004307

56.

Rauscher

Shen

(2022). Variation in the relationship between school spending and achievement: Progressive spending is efficient. American Journal of Sociology, 128(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1086/719956

57.

Reardon

S. F.

(2011). The widening socioeconomic status achievement gap: New evidence and possible explanations. In Duncan

G. J.

Murnane

R. J.

(Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 91–116). Russell Sage Foundation.

58.

Reardon

S. F.

(2019). Educational opportunity in early and middle childhood: Using full population administrative data to study variation by place and age. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2019.5.2.03

59.

Reardon

S. F.

A. D.

Shear

B. R.

Fahle

E. M.

Kalogrides

Saliba

(2024). Stanford Education Data Archive (Version 5.0) [Data set]. Stanford University. https://purl.stanford.edu/xh833nn4025

60.

Reardon

S. F.

Owens

Kalogrides

(2025). School segregation data (Version 2.0) [Data set]. The Segregation Tracking Project. http://edopportunity.org/segregation

61.

Reardon

S. F.

Raudenbush

S. W.

(2009). Assumptions of value-added models for estimating school effects. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 492–519. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2009.4.4.492

62.

Robinson

G. K.

(1991). That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Statistical Science, 6(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011926

63.

Rubin

D. B.

Stuart

E. A.

Zanutto

E. L.

(2004). A potential outcomes view of value-added assessment in education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001103

64.

Schmidt

W. H.

Burroughs

N. A.

(2016). The trade-off between excellence and equality: What international assessments tell us. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 17, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2016.0011

65.

Schwartz

A. E.

Rothbart

M. W.

(2020). Let them eat lunch: The impact of universal free meals on student performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(2), 376–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22175

66.

Schwartz

A. E.

Horn

K. M.

Ellen

I. G.

Cordes

S. A.

(2020). Do housing vouchers improve academic performance? Evidence from New York City. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(1), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22183

67.

Soland

(2021). Are schools deemed effective based on overall student growth also closing achievement gaps? Examining the Black–White gap by school. Teachers College Record, 123(12), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681211070876

68.

Spiegel

Clark

Domina

Penner

E. K.

Hanselman

Yoo

P. Y.

Penner

(2025). Peer income exposure across the income distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 122(7), e2410349122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2410349122

69.

Tekwe

C. D.

Carter

R. L.

C. X.

Algina

Lucas

M. E.

Roth

Ariet

Fisher

Resnick

M. B.

(2004). An empirical comparison of statistical models for value-added assessment of school performance. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986029001011

70.

Tomaskovic-Devey

Avent-Holt

D. R.

(2019). Relational inequalities: An organizational approach. Oxford University Press.

71.

Tyson

(2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, black students, and acting white after brown. Oxford University Press.

72.

Weick

K. E.

(1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875

73.

Yanez

Seldin

Mann

(2020). Public school principals’ top three most important education goals, by charter status and school level (Data Point NCES 2020-201). Institute of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020201.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.17 MB

0.00 MB