Despite increasing recognition of the importance of high-quality school leadership, we know remarkably little about principal skill development. Using administrative data from Tennessee, Oregon, and New York City, we estimate the returns to principal experience as measured by student outcomes, teacher hiring and retention patterns, and teacher and supervisor ratings of principals. The typical principal leads a school for only 3 to 5 years and leaves the principalship after 6 to 7 years. We find little evidence that school performance improves as principals gain experience, despite substantial improvement in supervisor ratings. Our results suggest that strategies intended to increase principal retention are unlikely to improve school outcomes absent more comprehensive efforts to strengthen the link between principal skill development and student and school outcomes.
AdnotM.DeeT.KatzV.WyckoffJ. (2017). Teacher turnover, teacher quality, and student achievement in DCPS. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716663646
2.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open, 1(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415607834
3.
Bambrick-SantoyoP.PeiserB. M. (2012). Leverage leadership: A practical guide to building exceptional schools. Jossey-Bass.
4.
BarrettA.O’ConnellP. J. (2001). Does training generally work? the returns to in-company training. ILR Review, 54(3), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390105400307
5.
BartanenB.GrissomJ. A. (2023). School principal race, teacher racial diversity, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 58(2), 666–712. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.58.4.0218-9328r2
6.
BartanenB.GrissomJ. A.RogersL. K. (2019). The impacts of principal turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719855044
BartanenB.HusainA. N.LiebowitzD. D. (2024). Rethinking principal effects on student outcomes. Journal of Public Economics, 234, 105115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105115
9.
BastianK. C.DrakeT. A. (2023). School leader apprenticeships: Assessing the characteristics of interns, internship schools, and mentor principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x231196502
10.
BastianK. C.HenryG. T. (2015). The apprentice: Pathways to the principalship and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(4), 600–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x14562213
11.
BeckerG. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/258724
12.
BeckerG. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (2nd ed.). National Bureau of Economic Research.
BertrandM.SchoarA. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552775
15.
BloomN.EifertB.MahajanA.McKenzieD.RobertsJ. (2013). Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs044
16.
BolJ. C. (2011). The determinants and performance effects of managers’ performance evaluation biases. Accounting Review, 86 (5), 1549–1575. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10099
17.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788
18.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2008). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement (Tech. Rep. No. 14022). National Bureau of Economic Research.
19.
BranchG.HanushekE. A.RivkinS. (2012). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (Tech. Rep. No. 17803). National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
BrenninkmeyerL. D.SpillaneJ. P. (2008). Problem-solving processes of expert and typical school principals: A quantitative look. School Leadership and Management, 28(5), 435–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802517209
21.
BrewerD. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(93)90062-l
22.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ.RockoffJ. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2593
23.
ChiangH.LipscombS.GillB. (2016). Is school value added indicative of principal quality?Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00184
24.
ClarkD.MartorellP.RockoffJ. (2009). School principals and school performance. Urban Institute.
CoffR. W. (2002). Human capital, shared expertise, and the likelihood of impasse in corporate acquisitions. Journal of Management, 28 (1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(01)00127-1
27.
CrookT. R.ToddS. Y.CombsJ. G.WoehrD. J.KetchenD. J.Jr. (2011). Does human capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022147
28.
Darling-HammondL.WechslerM.LevinS.Leung-GagneM.TozerS. (2022). Developing effective principals: What kind of learning matters? (Tech. Rep.). Learning Policy Institute.
29.
DavisK.RogersD.HarriganM. (2020). A review of state policies on principal professional development. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28 (24), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4421
30.
DeMatthewsD.BillingsleyB.McLeskeyJ.SharmaU. (2020). Principal leadership for students with disabilities in effective inclusive schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-10-2019-0177
31.
De VotoC.SuperfineB. M.DeWitM. (2023). Navigating policy and local context in times of crisis: District and school leader responses to the Covid-19 pandemic. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59 (2), 339–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x231163870
32.
DhueyE.SmithJ. (2014). How important are school principals in the production of student achievement?Canadian Journal of Economics, 47(2), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12086
33.
EbertsR. W.StoneJ. A. (1988). Student achievement in public schools: Do principals make a difference?Economics of Education Review, 7(3), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(88)90002-7
34.
EdwardsW.AndersonC. Q. (2023). Teacher-principal ethnoracial matching, geography, and novice teacher career outcomes. AERA Open, 9, 23328584231213344. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231213344
35.
EvansA. E. (2007). School leaders and their sensemaking about race and demographic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x06294575
36.
FarleyA. N.ChildsJ.JohnsonO. (2019). Preparing leaders for wicked problems? How the revised PSEL and NELP standards address equity and justice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27, 115–115. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4229
37.
GatesS. M.WooA.XenakisL.WangE. L.HermanR.AndrewM.ToddI. (2020). Using state-level policy levers to promote principal quality. RAND Corporation.
38.
GoffP.Edward GuthrieJ.GoldringE. B.BickmanL. (2014). Changing principals’ leadership through feedback and coaching. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 682–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-10-2013-0113
39.
GoldringE. B.ClarkM. A.RubinM.RogersL. K.GrissomJ. A.GillB.KautzT.McCulloughM.NeelM.BurnettA. (2020, July). Changing the principal supervisor role to better support principals: Evidence from the Principal Supervisor Initiative (Tech. Rep.). Vanderbilt University/Peabody College, Mathematica Policy Research.
40.
GoldringE. B.HuffJ.MayH.CamburnE. (2008). School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice?Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810869275
41.
GoldringE. B.PorterA.MurphyJ.ElliottS. N.CravensX. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760802014951
42.
GoodenM. A.O’DohertyA. (2015). Do you see what I see? Fostering aspiring leaders’ racial awareness. Urban Education, 50(2), 225–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914534273
43.
GreenbergJ. (1991). Motivation to inflate performance ratings: Perceptual bias or response bias?Motivation and Emotion, 15, 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00991477
44.
GrissomJ. A.BartanenB. (2019a). Principal effectiveness and principal turnover. Education Finance and Policy, 14(3), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00256
45.
GrissomJ. A.BartanenB. (2019b). Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 514–555. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218797931
46.
GrissomJ. A.BartanenB.MitaniH. (2019). Principal sorting and the distribution of principal quality. AERA Open, 5(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419850094
47.
GrissomJ. A.BlissettR. S. L.MitaniH. (2018). Evaluating school principals: Supervisor ratings of principal practice and principal job performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 446–472. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718783883
48.
GrissomJ. A.EgaliteA. J.LindsayC. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research (pp. 1–115). Wallace.
49.
GrissomJ. A.HarringtonJ. R. (2010). Investing in administrator efficacy: An examination of professional development as a tool for enhancing principal effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1086/653631
50.
GrissomJ. A.KalogridesD.LoebS. (2015). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714523831
51.
GrissomJ. A.LoebS. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211402663
52.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.BlissettR. S. L. (2017). Principal licensure exams and future job performance: Evidence from the school leaders licensure assessment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 248–280. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716680293
53.
GrissomJ. A.MitaniH.WooD. S. (2019). Principal preparation programs and principal outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 73–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x18785865
54.
GutheryS.BailesL. P. (2022). Building experience and retention: The influence of principal tenure on teacher retention rates. Journal of Education Administration, 60 (4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-09-2021-0172
55.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
56.
HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
59.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2010). Collaborative leadership effects on school improvement: Integrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226–252. https://doi.org/10.1086/656299
60.
HeckmanJ.LochnerL.CossaR. (2002). Learning-by-doing vs. on-the-job training: Using variation induced by the EITC to distinguish between models of skill formation (Working Paper No. 9083). National Bureau of Economic Research.
61.
HerrmannM.ClarkM.James-BurdumyS.TuttleC.KautzT.KnechtelV.DotterD.WulsinC. S.DekeJ. (2019). The effects of a principal professional development program focused on instructional leadership. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
62.
HittD. H.WoodruffD.MeyersC. V.ZhuG. (2018). Principal competencies that make a difference: Identifying a model for leaders of school turnaround. Journal of School Leadership, 28(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461802800103
63.
HonigM. I.RaineyL. (2020). Supervising principals for instructional leadership: A teaching and learning approach. Harvard Education Press Cambridge.
HorngE.KlasikD.LoebS. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/653625
66.
HuangT.HochbeinC.SimonsJ. (2018). The relationship among school contexts, principal time use, school climate, and student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5), 1741143218802595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218802595
JacobR.GoddardR.KimM.MillerR.GoddardY. (2015). Exploring the causal impact of the McREL Balanced Leadership Program on leadership, principal efficacy, instructional climate, educator turnover, and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37 (3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714549620
69.
JacobsonS. L.BrooksS.GilesC.JohnsonL.YlimakiR. (2007). Successful leadership in three high-poverty urban elementary schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760701431553
70.
JohnsonA. D.ClegorneN.CroftS. J.FordA. Y. (2021). The professional learning needs of school principals. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16(4), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120933933
71.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401004
72.
JonesE.BerginC.MurphyB. (2021). Principals may inflate teacher evaluation scores to achieve important goals. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34, 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09366-8
73.
KhalifaM. A.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
74.
KorY. Y.MahoneyJ. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (5), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.459
75.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
76.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P.ChiO. L. (2020). Teacher skill development: Evidence from performance ratings by principals. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(2), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22193
LaddH. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711398128
79.
LaddH. F.SorensenL. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00194
80.
LeithwoodK. A.JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
LevinS.BradleyK. (2019). Understanding and addressing principal retention: A review of the research (Tech. Rep.). National Association of Secondary School Principals and Learning Policy Institute.
83.
LevittB.MarchJ. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
84.
LiebowitzD. D.PorterL. (2019). The effect of principal behaviors on student, teacher, and school outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 785–827. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654319866133
85.
LiebowitzD. D.PorterL. (2022). Descriptive evidence on school leaders’ prior professional experiences and instructional effectiveness. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(2), 409–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2022.2160359
86.
LoebS.KalogridesD.BéteilleT. (2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 269–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00068
87.
LouisK. S.MurphyJ. (2017). Trust, caring and organizational learning: The leader’s role. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 103–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jea-07-2016-0077
88.
MannaP. (2015). Developing excellent school principals to advance teaching and learning: Considerations for state policy. Wallace Foundation.
89.
MarzanoR.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Association for Supervision; Curriculum Development.
90.
MeyersC. V.Hambrick HittD. (2017). School turnaround principals: What does initial research literature suggest they are doing to be successful?Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 22(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2016.1242070
MincerJ. (1988). Job training, wage growth, and labor turnover (NBER Working Paper No. 2690). National Bureau of Economic Research.
93.
MurnaneR. J. (1984). Selection and survival in the teacher labor market. Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925013
94.
NealD. (1995). Industry-specific human capital: Evidence from displaced workers. Journal of Labor Economics, 13(4), 653–677. https://doi.org/10.1086/298388
95.
NelsonL. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods and Research, 49(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703
96.
NeumerskiC. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review what do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x12456700
97.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA). (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders. www.npbea.org
98.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA). (2018). National educational leadership preparation (NELP) program recognition standards. www.npbea.org
99.
PapayJ. P.KraftM. A. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Economics, 130, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008
100.
ParkJ.-H.LeeI. H.CoocN. (2019). The role of school-level mechanisms: How principal support, professional learning communities, collective responsibility, and group-level teacher expectations affect student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(5), 742–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x18821355
101.
PerroneF.TuckerP. D. (2019). Shifting profile of leadership preparation programs in the 21st century. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(2), 253–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x18799473
102.
PlattA. D.TrippC.OgdenW.FraserR. (2000). The skillful leader: Confronting mediocre teaching. Ready About Press.
103.
PoletaevM.RobinsonC. (2008). Human capital specificity: Evidence from the dictionary of occupational titles and displaced worker surveys, 1984–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1086/588180
104.
RobinsonV. M. J.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x08321509
105.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 94 (2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
106.
RogersL. K.GoldringE. B.RubinM.NeelM.GrissomJ. A. (2021). Managing time? principal supervisors’ time use to support principals. In LeeM.PollockK.TulowitzkiP. (Eds.), How school principals use their time (pp. 110–125). Routledge.
107.
RogersL. K.VanGronigenB. A. (2023). Beyond preparation: State approaches to early career principal induction. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22(3), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2021.1977333
108.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
109.
RowlandC. (2017). Principal professional development: New opportunities for a renewed state focus. Education Policy Center at American Institutes for Research.
110.
SebastianJ.AllensworthE. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48 (4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x11436273
111.
SebastianJ.CamburnE. M.SpillaneJ. P. (2017). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x17720978
112.
Snodgrass RangelV. (2018). A review of the literature on principal turnover. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743197
113.
SoderstromN. C.BjorkR. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000
114.
SpillaneJ. P.HuntB. R. (2010). Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42 (3), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903527623
115.
SteinbergM. P.YangH. (2022). Does principal professional development improve schooling outcomes? Evidence from Pennsylvania’s Inspired Leadership Induction Program. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 15(4), 799–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2052386
116.
StosichE. L.ThessinR. A.MeyersC. V. (2024). Learning together to lead together: Designing professional learning to strengthen principal and district leadership for school improvement. American Journal of Education, 130(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/728266
117.
ThessinR. A. (2019). Establishing productive principal/principal supervisor partnerships for instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0184
118.
TranH.McCormickJ.NguyenT. (2018). The cost of replacing South Carolina high school principals. Management in Education, 32(3), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020617747609
119.
TurnbullB. J.BruceM.EriksonH.ArcairaR.RileyD. L.SinclairB.ColemanS. (2009). Evaluation of the school administration manager project (Tech. Rep.). Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
120.
U.S. Department of Education. (2022). National teacher and principal survey (NTPS), public school principal data files (Tech. Rep.). National Center for Education Statistics.
121.
WangF.PollockK.HausemanC. (2023). Time demands and emotionally draining situations amid work intensification of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(1), 112–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x221132837
122.
WeinsteinM.JacobowitzR.ElyT.LandonK.SchwartzA. E. (2009, June). New schools, new leaders: A study of principal turnover and academic achievement at new high schools in New York City. The Institute for Education and Social Policy, New York University.
123.
WintersM. A.KisidaB.ChoI. (2023). The impact of principal attrition and replacement on indicators of school quality. Education Finance and Policy, 18(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00362
124.
YeatesP.O’NeillP.MannK.W EvaK. (2013). “You’re certainly relatively competent”: Assessor bias due to recent experiences. Medical Education, 47 (9), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12254
125.
YoungsP.KingM. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38 (5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x02239642
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
