Drawing on annual, nationally representative survey data from 2007–2022, I demonstrate that partisan gaps—the average differences in public opinion between Democrats and Republicans—have widened on many education issues. This pattern consistently exceeds what would be expected due to the changing demographic compositions of the parties alone. Widening partisan gaps are primarily attributable to sorting (alignment of one's party affiliation and one's issue positions) rather than polarization (increasing support for more extreme positions relative to more moderate positions). However, polarization is also increasing on some of the most divisive issues. Among those who are sorting, individuals are overwhelmingly switching their issue positions to align with their party affiliations rather than switching their party affiliations to align with their issue positions.
BerkmanM.PlutzerE. (2010). Evolution, creationism, and the battle to control America's classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BinderS. A. (2003). Stalemate: Causes and consequences of legislative gridlock. Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BoryczkaJ. (2009). Whose responsibility? The politics of sex education policy in the United States. Politics and Gender, 5(2), 185–210.
8.
Bulman-PozenJ. (2014). Partisan federalism. Harvard Law Review, 127(4), 1077–1146.
9.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton University Press.
10.
CaugheyD.XuY.WarshawC. (2017). Incremental democracy: The policy effects of partisan control of state government. Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1342–1358.
CollinsJ. E. (2021). Who wants to reopen schools in a pandemic? Explaining public preferences reopening schools and public compliance with reopening orders during the COVID-19 pandemic [EdWorkingPaper 21-448]. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai21-448.
13.
CollinsJ. E. (2022). They only hate the term: Explaining opposition to history curriculum policy and critical race theory [EdWorkingPaper 22-649]. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai22-649.
14.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). Free Press.
15.
CurryJ. M.LeeF. E. (2020). The limits of party: Congress and lawmaking in a polarized era. University of Chicago Press.
16.
DaviesG. (2007). See government grow: Education politics from Johnson to Reagan. University Press of Kansas.
17.
DelmontM. F. (2016). Why busing failed: Race, media, and the national resistance to school desegregation. University of California Press.
18.
EpsteinL.PosnerE. A. (2018). The decline of Supreme Court deference to the president. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(4), 829–860.
19.
FingerL. K.HartneyM. T. (2019). Financial solidarity: The future of unions in the post-Janus era. Perspectives on Politics, 19(1), 19–35.
20.
FingerL. K.ReckhowS. (2022). Policy feedback and the polarization of interest groups. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 22(1), 70–95.
21.
FiorinaM. P. (2017). Unstable majorities: Polarization, party sorting, and political stalemate. Hoover Institution Press.
22.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. Pearson Longman.
HenigJ. R. (2013). The end of exceptionalism in American education: The changing politics of school reform. Harvard Education Press.
33.
HenigJ. R.HoustonD. M.LyonM. A. (2017). From NCLB to ESSA: Lessons learned or politics reaffirmed? In HessF. M.EdenM. (Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for schools, systems, and states (pp. 29–42). Harvard Education Press.
34.
HenigJ. R.JacobsenR.ReckhowS. (2019). Outside money in school board elections: The nationalization of education politics. Harvard Education Press.
KeithB. E.MaglebyD. B.NelsonC. J.OrrE.WestlyeM. C. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. University of California Press.
45.
LeeF. E. (2016). Insecure majorities: Congress and the perpetual campaign. University of Chicago Press.
46.
LelkesY.SoodG.IyengarS. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1): 5–20.
47.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.
MaglebyD. B.NelsonC. J.WestlyeM. C. (2011). The myth of the independent voter revisited. In SnidermanP. M.HightonB. (Eds.), Facing the challenge of democracy: Explorations in the analysis of public opinion and political participation (pp. 238–266). Princeton University Press.
50.
MannT. E.OrnsteinN. J. (2016). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. Basic Books.
51.
MartinG. J.YurukogluA. (2017). Bias in cable news: Persuasion and polarization. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2565–2599.
52.
MasonL. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
53.
McAndrewsL. J. (2010). “Moral” victories: Ronald Reagan and the debate over school prayer. Religion and Education, 30(1), 92–107.
54.
McCartyN. (2019). Polarization: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
55.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
56.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.RosenthalH. (2016). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
57.
McGuinnP. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965–2005. University Press of Kansas.
58.
McGuinnP. J. (2017). From ESEA to NCLB: The growth of the federal role and the shift to accountability. In HessF. M.EdenM. (Eds.), The Every Student Succeeds Act: What it means for schools, systems, and states (pp. 13–28). Harvard Education Press.
59.
MehtaJ.TelesS. (2011). Jurisdictional politics: A new federal role in education. In HessF. M.KellyA. P. (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and the bully pulpit: Lessons from a half-century of federal efforts to improve America's schools (pp. 197–215). Harvard Education Press.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
65.
PetersonP. E.HendersonM. B.WestM. R. (2014). Teachers versus the public: What Americans think about schools and how to fix them. Brookings Institution Press.
ShapiroR. Y.KilibardaA.SinozichS.McClellanO. (2021). American public opinion and partisan conflict: Education's exceptionalism? In WestM. R.WoessmannL. (Eds.), Public opinion and the political economy of education policy around the world (pp. 141–174). MIT Press.
74.
SidesJ.TausanovitchC.VavreckL. (2022). The bitter end: The 2020 presidential campaign and the challenge to American democracy. Princeton University Press.
75.
SinclairB. (2006). Party wars: Polarization and the politics of national policy making. University of Oklahoma Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
