Many prior studies have explored average differences in initial levels of teaching effectiveness among graduates from different teacher preparation programs (TPPs) and the features of preparation that predict these differences. We focus on another important dimension of effectiveness—how graduates from different TPPs improve over time. Examining all graduates from Tennessee TPPs from 2010 to 2018, we find meaningful differences between TPPs in both initial level and early-career growth in teaching effectiveness. We also find that different TPP features explain part of these differences. Yet the features that correlate with initial teaching effectiveness are not the same features that correlate with growth. This article informs policy decisions around TPP evaluation and identifies new directions for future research in TPP effectiveness.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open, 1(4), 2332858415607834. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415607834
2.
Bacher-HicksA.ChinM. J.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2017). An evaluation of bias in three measures of teacher quality: Value-added, classroom observations, and student surveys (No. w23478). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
BakerE. L.BartonP. E.Darling-HammondL.HaertelE.LaddH. F.LinnR. L.RavitchD.RothsteinR.ShavelsonR. J.ShepardL. A. (2010). Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers (EPI Briefing Paper #278). Economic Policy Institute.
BartanenB.KwokA. (2020). Pre-service teacher quality and workforce entry (EdWorkingPaper 20-223). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai20-223
6.
BastianK. C.PattersonK. M.PanY. (2018). Evaluating teacher preparation programs with teacher evaluation ratings: Implications for program accountability and improvement. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(5), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117718182
7.
BitlerM.CorcoranS. P.DominaT.PennerE. K. (2021). Teacher effects on student achievement and height: A cautionary tale. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 14(4), 900–924.
8.
BoydD. J.GrossmanP. L.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709353129
9.
BoydD. J.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 24(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20072
10.
BuzickH. M.JonesN. D. (2015). Using test scores from students with disabilities in teacher evaluation. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(3), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12076
11.
California State University (CSU). (2002). First system wide evaluation of teacher education programs in the California State University: Summary report.
12.
CampbellS. L.RonfeldtM. (2018). Observational evaluation of teachers: Measuring more than we bargained for?American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1233–1267. https://doi.org/10/gd32fh
13.
CannataM. (2011). The role of social networks in the teacher job search process. Elementary School Journal, 111 (3), 1–24.
14.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.RockoffJ. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632.
ConstantineJ.PlayerD.SilvaT.HallgrenK.GriderM.DekeJ. (2009). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification (NCEE 2009-4043). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED504313
Darling-HammondL.HoltzmanD. J.GatlinS. J.Vasquez HeiligJ. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). http://www.redalyc.org/html/2750/275020513042/
19.
DeweyJ. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In McMurryC. A. (Ed.), The third yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education. University of Chicago Press.
20.
GierschJ.DongC. (2018). Principals’ preferences when hiring teachers: A conjoint experiment. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2017-0074
21.
GlazermanS.MayerD.DeckerP. (2006). Alternative routes to teaching: The impacts of Teach for America on student achievement and other outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20157
22.
GoldhaberD.LiddleS.TheobaldR. (2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 34, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.011
23.
GoldhaberD.RonfeldtM. (2020). Towards causal evidence on effective teacher preparation. In CarinciJ. E.JacksonK.MeyerS. J. (Eds.), Linking teacher preparation program design and implementation to outcomes for teachers and students (pp. 211–236). IAP.
24.
GrossmanP. L.LoebS. (2008). Alternative routes to teaching: Mapping the new landscape of teacher education. Harvard Education Press.
25.
GrossmanP. L.RichertA. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A reexamination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 53–62.
26.
HarrisD. N.RutledgeS. A.IngleW. K.ThompsonC. C. (2010). Mix and match: What principals really look for when hiring teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 5(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2010.5.2.5205
HenryG. T.BastianK. C.FortnerC. K.KershawD. C.PurtellK. M.ThompsonC. L.ZulliR. A. (2014). Teacher preparation policies and their effects on student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 9(3), 264–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00134
29.
HenryG. T.FortnerC. K.BastianK. C. (2012). The effects of experience and attrition for novice high-school science and mathematics teachers. Science, 335(6072), 1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215343
30.
HenryG. T.PurtellK. M.BastianK. C.FortnerC. K.ThompsonC. L.CampbellS. L.PattersonK. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113503871
31.
JabbarH.CannataM.GermainE.CastroA. (2020). It’s who you know: The role of social networks in a changing labor market. American Educational Research Journal, 57(4), 1485–1524. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219879092
32.
JacobB. A.RockoffJ. E.TaylorE. S.LindyB.RosenR. (2018). Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 166, 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.011
33.
JonesN. D.BrownellM. T. (2014). Examining the use of classroom observations in the evaluation of special education teachers. Assessment for Effectiveness Intervention, 39(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413514103
34.
KaneT. J.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.05.005
35.
KennedyM. M. (1987). Inexact sciences: Professional education and the development of expertise (Issue Paper 87-2). National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
36.
KoedelC.ParsonsE.PodgurskyM.EhlertM. (2015). Teacher preparation programs and teacher quality: Are there real differences across programs?Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 508–534. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00172
37.
KraftM. A.BrunnerE. J.DoughertyS. M.SchwegmanD. J. (2020). Teacher accountability reforms and the supply and quality of new teachers. Journal of Public Economics, 188, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104212
38.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496
39.
MihalyK.McCaffreyD.SassT. R.LockwoodJ. R. (2013). Where you come from or where you go? Distinguishing between school quality and the effectiveness of teacher preparation program graduates. Education Finance and Policy, 8(4), 459–493. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00110
40.
PapayJ. P.KraftM. A. (2015). Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. Journal of Public Econonics, 130, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.008
41.
PapayJ. P.LaskiM. E. (2020). Understanding the Dynamics of Teacher Productivity Development: Evidence on Teacher Improvement in Tennessee [Working paper].
42.
PapayJ. P.WestM. R.FullertonJ. B.KaneT. J. (2012). Does an urban teacher residency increase student achievement? Early evidence from Boston. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712454328
43.
PrestonC. (2017). University-based teacher preparation and middle grades teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116660151
44.
ReiningerM. (2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420864
45.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economics Review, 94(2), 247–252.
46.
RockoffJ. E.JacobB. A.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one?Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00022
47.
RonfeldtM. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420865
48.
RonfeldtM. (2015). Field placement schools and instructional effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115592463
49.
RonfeldtM. (2021). Links among teacher preparation, retention, and teaching effectiveness. Evaluating and Improving Teacher Preparation Programs. National Academy of Education Committee on Evaluating and Improving Teacher Preparation Programs. National Academy of Education. https://doi.org/10.31094/2021/3/1
50.
RonfeldtM.CampbellS. L. (2016). Evaluating teacher preparation using graduates’ observational ratings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 603–625.
51.
RonfeldtM.MatskoK. K.Greene NolanH.ReiningerM. (2020). Three different measures of graduates’ instructional readiness and the features of preservice preparation that predict them. Journal of Teacher Education, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120919753.
RonfeldtM.SchwartzN.JacobB. (2014). Does pre-service preparation matter? Examining an old question in new ways. Teachers College Record, 116(10), 1–46.
54.
RothsteinJ. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.
55.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic Books.
56.
von HippelP. T.BellowsL. (2018). How much does teacher quality vary across teacher preparation programs? Reanalyses from six states. Economics of Education Review, 64, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.01.005
57.
von HippelP. T.BellowsL.OsborneC.LincoveJ. A.MillsN. (2016). Teacher quality differences between teacher preparation programs: How big? How reliable? Which programs are different?Economics of Education Review, 53, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.05.002
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
