Supporting teacher learning for normative change in classroom learning environments creates significant demands on principal leadership. We offer an analytic framework that aims to understand principal practice for instructional transformation. The framework examines how the principal’s conception of teacher learning shapes practice in relation to particular contexts and support systems. We illustrate the explanatory power of this framework by using it to make sense of one elementary principal’s practice in leading her school for instructional transformation in mathematics. Our analysis contributes to how leadership efforts to transform instruction might be studied and ultimately supported.
AguirreJ.Mayfield-IngramK.MartinD. (2013). The impact of identity in K–8 mathematics learning and teaching: Rethinking equity-based practices. NCTM.
2.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–32). Jossey Bass.
3.
BatteyD.FrankeM. (2015). Integrating professional development on mathematics and equity: Countering deficit views of students of color. Education and Urban Society, 47(4), 433–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513497788
BostonM. D.HenrickE. C.GibbonsL. K.BerebitskyD.ColbyG. T. (2016). Investigating how to support principals as instructional leaders in mathematics. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(3), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116640254
7.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
8.
BurchP.SpillaneJ. P. (2003). Elementary school leadership strategies and subject matter: Reforming mathematics and literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 103(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/499738
9.
CobbP.JacksonK.HenrickE.SmithT. M. (2018). Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Harvard Education Press.
10.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
11.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167272
12.
CohenD. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164355
13.
CohenD. K.SpillaneJ. P.PeurachD. J. (2018). The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17743488
14.
Darling-HammondL.WeiR. C.AndreeA.RichardsonN.OprhanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
15.
Drago-SeversonE.PintoK. C. (2004). From barriers to breakthroughs: Principals’ strategies for overcoming challenges to teachers’ transformational learning. Journal of School Leadership, 14(6), 653–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460401400603
16.
DavisJ.MartinD. B. (2008). Racism, assessment, and instructional practices: Implications for mathematics teachers of African American students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 1(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v11i1-2a358
17.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). MacMillan.
18.
FarrellC. C.PenuelW. R.CoburnC.DanielJ.SteupL. (2021). Research-practice partnerships in education: The state of the field. William T. Grant Foundation.
19.
FoxA. (2018). Becoming an instructional leader for elementary mathematics: Transforming principal learning through a research-practice partnership [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington, Seattle.
20.
FrankeM. L.CarpenterT. P.LeviL.FennemaE. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003653
21.
FrankeM. L.KazemiE.BatteyD. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 225–256). Information Age Publishing.
22.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.AmericanS.WinterN.PorterA. C. (2001). What makes professional development effective?American Education Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
23.
GibbonsL. K.KazemiE.HintzA.HartmannE. (2017). Teacher time out: Educators learning together in and through practice. Journal of Mathematics Educational Leadership, 18(2), 28–46.
24.
GibbonsL.KazemiE.LewisR. (2017). Developing collective capacity to improve mathematics instruction: Coaching as a lever for school-wide improvement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46, 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.002
25.
GibbonsL. K.WilhelmA. G.CobbP. (2019). Coordinating leadership supports for teachers’ instructional improvement. Journal of School Leadership, 29(3), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684619836824
26.
GoddardR.GoddardY.Sook KimE.MillerR. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.
27.
GoffneyI.GutiérrezR. (Eds.). (2018). Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students. NCTM.
28.
GrissomJ. A.EgaliteA. J.LindsayC. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis
29.
GrissomJ. A.LoebS.MasterB. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13510020
30.
GrossmanP.WineburgS.WoolworthS. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00140
31.
GutiérrezR. (2017). Political conocimiento for teaching mathematics: Why teachers need it and how to develop it. In KastbergS.TyminskiA. M.LischkaA.SanchezW. (Eds.), Building support for scholarly practices in mathematics methods (pp. 11–38). Information Age.
32.
HallingerP. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
HonigM. I.HatchT. C. (2003). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
35.
HollingworthL.OlsenD.Asikin-GarmagerA.WinnK. M. (2018). Initiating conversations and opening doors: How principals establish a positive building culture to sustain school improvement efforts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 1014–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217720461
36.
HopkinsM.SpillaneJ. P. (2015). Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction: Regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 421–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9257-1
37.
HornI. S.LittleJ. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345158
38.
HubbardL.MehanH.SteinM. K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. Routledge.
39.
Hufferd-AcklesK.FusonK. C.SherinM. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034933
40.
IshimaruA. M.GallowayM. K. (2021). Hearts and minds first: Institutional logics in pursuit of educational equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 470–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20947459
41.
JacksonK.CobbP.WilsonJ.WebsterM.DunlapC.AppelgateM. (2015). Investigating the development of mathematics leaders’ capacity to support teachers’ learning on a large scale. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0652-5
42.
JacksonK.GibbonsL.SharpeC. (2017). Teachers’ views of students’ mathematical capabilities: Challenges and possibilities for ambitious reform. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900708
43.
JohnsonS. M.MariettaG.HigginsM. C.MappK. L.GrossmanA. S. (2014). Achieving coherence in district improvement: Managing the relationship between the central office and schools. Harvard Education Press.
44.
KatterfeldK. (2013). Setting instructional expectations: Patterns of principal leadership for middle school mathematics. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(4), 337–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2013.792935
45.
KazemiE.GibbonsL. K.LewisR.FoxA.HintzA.Kelley-PetersenM.Adrian CunardA.LomaxK.LengesA.BalfR. (2018). Math labs: Teachers, teacher educators, and school leaders learning together with and from their own students. Journal of Mathematics Educational Leadership, 19(1), 23–36.
46.
KazemiE.ResnickA. F. (2020). Organising schools for teacher and leader learning. In LloydG. M. (Ed.), Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities, and networks (pp. 393–420). In ChapmanO. (Series Ed.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (2nd ed., Vol. 3). Sense Publishers.
47.
KennedyM. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
48.
KhalifaM. A. (2018). Culturally responsive school leadership. Harvard Education Press.
49.
KnappM. S. (2003). Chapter 4: Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27(1), 109–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X027001109
50.
KoellnerK.JacobsJ.BorkoH. (2011). Mathematics professional development: Critical features for developing leadership skills and building teachers’ capacity. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2008), 115–136.
51.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1997). It doesn’t add up: African American students’ mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/749638
52.
LampertM. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press.
53.
LampertM.BoerstT. A.GrazianiF. (2011). Organizational resources in the service of school-wide ambitious teaching practice. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1361–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300706
54.
LeChasseurK.DonaldsonM.FernandezE.Femc-BagwellM. (2018). Brokering, buffering, and the rationalities of principal work. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2016-0129
55.
LeithwoodK.LouisK. S.AndersonS.WahlstromK. L. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership project. The Wallace Foundation.
56.
LewisC.PerryR.MurataA. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003003
57.
LewisR. (2016). Understanding teacher and student learning situated in a school-wide implementation of fractions instruction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington College of Education.
58.
LochmillerC. R.Acker-HocevarM. (2016). Making sense of principal leadership in content areas: The case of secondary math and science instruction. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(3), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1073329
59.
LouieN. (2020). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664
60.
MartinD. B.AndersonC. R.ShahN. (2017). Race and mathematics education. In CaiJ. (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 607–636). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
61.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
62.
MilnerH. R. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23414665
63.
MosesR. P.CobbC. E. (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Beacon Press.
NasirN. S. (2016). Why should mathematics educators care about race and culture?Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v9i1a298
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
68.
NelsonB. S.SassiA. (2005). The effective principal: Instructional leadership for high-quality learning. Teachers College Press.
69.
PeurachD. J.YurkofskyM. M.SutherlandD. H. (2019). Organizing and managing for excellence and equity: The work and dilemmas of instructionally focused education systems. Educational Policy, 33(6), 812–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819867267
RigbyJ. G.FormanS.LewisR. (2019). Principals’ leadership moves to implement a discipline-specific instructional improvement policy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1668422
72.
RigbyJ. G.Larbi-CherifA.RosenquistB. A.SharpeC. J.CobbP.SmithT. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: Does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction?Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 475–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16687006
73.
RubelL. H. (2017). Equity-directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant perspective. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 66–105. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a324
74.
RussR. S.SherinB. L.SherinM. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning? In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), AERA handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 391–438). American Educational Research Association.
75.
SebastianJ.AllensworthE. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273
76.
ShahN. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teacher College Record, 119(7), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900705
77.
SpencerJ. A. (2009). Identity at the crossroads: Understanding the processes and forces that shape African-American success and struggle in mathematics. In MartinD. B. (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of Black children (pp. 200–230). Routledge.
78.
SpillaneJ. (2002). Local theories of teacher change: The pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 377–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00167
79.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
80.
SteeleM. D.JohnsonK. R.OttenS.Herbel-EisenmannB. A.CarverC. L. (2015). Improving instructional leadership through the development of leadership content knowledge: The case of principal learning in algebra. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775115569353
81.
Tschannen-MoranM.GareisC. R. (2015). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50980-8_8
82.
TrujilloT.MøllerJ.JensenR.KissellR. E.LarsenE. (2021). Images of educational leadership: How principals make sense of democracy and social justice in two distinct policy contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20981148
83.
TurnerE. E.DrakeC.McDuffieA. R.AguirreJ.BartellT. G.FooteM. Q. (2012). Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: A framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9196-6
84.
van EsE. A.SherinM. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9130-3
85.
WilsonP. H.SztajnP.WebbJ. (2017). Changes in teachers’ discourse about students in a professional development on learning trajectories. American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), 568–604. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217693801
86.
YinR. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
87.
YoungsP.KingM. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239642
88.
YurkofskyM. M.PetersonA. J.MehtaJ. D.Horwitz-WillisR.FruminK. M. (2020). Research on continuous improvement: Exploring the complexities of managing educational change. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 403–433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907363
