This article contributes to our understanding of American education politics by exploring when and why states redistribute K–12 education dollars to poorer schools. It does so by examining three explanations for intrastate changes in progressivity: court-ordered finance reforms, political trends, and demographic changes. Using state-level data from 1995 to 2016, we find mixed evidence that progressivity increased following a court-ordered school-finance overhaul. Rather, we show that changes in progressivity were most consistently tied to changes in student demography: As students became poorer, or more racially diverse, lawmakers created less progressive finance systems. The article concludes by discussing what these findings mean for advocates seeking to protect and advance gains in education-spending progressivity.
BartelsL. (2016). Unequal democracy. Princeton University Press.
6.
BechtelM.LieschR.ScheveK. (2018). Inequality and redistribution behavior in a give-or-take game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(14), 3611–3616.
7.
BerryC. (2007). The impact of school finance judgements on state fiscal policy. In WestM.PetersonP. (Eds.), School money trials: The legal pursuit of educational adequacy (pp. 213–242). Brookings Institution Press.
8.
BerryC.WysongC. (2012). Making courts matter: Politics and the implementation of state supreme court decisions. University of Chicago Law Review, 79(1), 1–29.
9.
BerryW.RingquistE.FordingR.HansonR. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 327–348.
10.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.
11.
BlackS. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577–599.
12.
BraceP.LangerL.HallM. (2000). Measuring the preferences of state supreme court judges. Journal of Politics, 62(2), 387–413.
13.
BursteinP. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.
CandelariaC.ShoresK. (2019). Court-ordered finance reforms in the adequacy era: Heterogeneous causal effects and sensitivity. Education Finance and Policy, 14(1), 31–60.
CardD.PayneA. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49–82.
18.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1990). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton University Press.
ChingosM.BlaggK. (2017). School funding: Do poor kids get their fair share?Urban Institute.
21.
ClintonJ.GrissomJ. (2015). Public information, public learning and public opinion: Democratic accountability in education policy. Journal of Public Policy, 35(3), 355–385.
22.
ColemanJ.CampbellE.HobsonC.McPartlandJ.MoodA.WeinfeldF.YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
23.
CondronD. (2017). The waning impact of school finance litigation on inequality in per student revenue during the adequacy era. Journal of Education Finance, 43(1), 1–20.
24.
ConstantelosJ. (2010). Playing the field: Federalism and the politics of venue shopping in the United States and Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40(3), 460–483.
25.
CorcoranS.EvansW. (2010). Income inequality, the median voter, and the support for public education. National Bureau of Economic Research.
26.
CorcoranS.EvansW.GodwinJ.MurrayS.SchwabR. (2004). The changing distribution of education finance: 1972–1997. In Social Inequality (pp. 433–465). Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
DuncombeW.YingerJ. (2005). How much more does a disadvantaged student cost?Economics of Education Review, 24(5), 513–532.
28.
DynarskiS.HymanJ.SchanzenbachD. (2013). Experimental evidence on the effect of childhood investments on postsecondary attainment and degree completion. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 692–717.
29.
EinsteinK.GlickD. (2017). Does race affect access to government services? An experiment exploring street-level bureaucrats and access to public housing. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 100–116.
30.
EnnsP.KochJ. (2013). Public opinion in the US states: 1956 to 2010. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 13(3), 349–372.
31.
EriksonR.WrightG.McIverJ. (2007). Measuring the public’s ideological preferences in the 50 states: Survey responses versus roll call data. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 141–151.
32.
FiglioD.FletcherD. (2012). Suburbanization, demographic change and the consequences for school finance. Journal of Public Economics, 96(11–12), 1144–1153.
GilensM. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. University of Chicago Press.
35.
GilensM.PageB. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.
36.
GordonN. (2004). Do federal grants boost school spending? Evidence from Title I. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 1771–1792.
37.
GreeneJ. (2020). The new causal research on school spending is not causal. Jay P. Greene’s Blog. https://jaypgreene.com/
38.
HackerJ.MettlerS.PinderhughesD. (2005). Inequality and Public Policy. American Political Science Association.
39.
HamiltonA. (1787). The federalist, number 78: “The judiciary department.”McLeans.
40.
HanushekE. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.
41.
HillA.JonesD. (2017). Does partisan affiliation impact the distribution of spending? Evidence from state governments’ expenditures on education. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 143, 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.008
42.
HuttE.KlasikD.TangA. (2020). How do judges decide school finance cases?Washington University Law Review, 97(4), 1046–1130.
43.
JacksonB. (2017). The rhetoric of redistribution. In CallaghanJ.FishmanN.JacksonB.McIvorM. (Eds.), In search of social democracy (pp. 233–251). Manchester University Press.
44.
JacksonC.JohnsonR.PersicoC. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218.
45.
JacksonC.WiggerC.XiongH. (2018). Do school spending cuts matter? Evidence from the Great Recession. National Bureau of Economic Research.
46.
JacobsonG. (2017). The electoral connection, then and now. In GerberA.SchicklerE. (Eds.), Governing in a polarized age: Elections, parties, and political representation in America (pp. 35–64). Cambridge University Press.
47.
KettlD. (2019). From policy to practice: From ideas to results, from results to trust. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 763–767.
48.
KimJ.KieselA. (2018). The long shadow of police racial treatment: Racial disparity in criminal justice processing. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 422–431.
49.
KitchensK. (2020). Partisan Politics and Public Education: Finding the formula for (electoral) success. State Politics and Policy Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440020933205
50.
KnightD.MendozaJ. (2019). Does the measurement matter? Assessing alternate approaches to measuring state school finance equity for California’s Local Control Funding Formula. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–31.
51.
KoganV.LavertuS.PeskowitzZ. (2021). The Democratic Deficit in U.S. education governance. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 1082–1089.
52.
KonstantopoulosS.ChungV. (2009). What are the long-term effects of small classes on the achievement gap? Evidence from the lasting benefits study. American Journal of Education, 116(1), 125–154.
53.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. Crown.
54.
LeeF. (2009). Beyond ideology: Politics, principles, and partisanship in the U.S. Senate. University of Chicago Press.
MalinJ. (2016). The prediction of states’ PK–12 funding effort and distribution based on their ideological makeups. Journal of Education Finance, 42(2), 220–242.
NewmanB.ShahS.CollingwoodL. (2018). Race, place, and building a base: Latino population growth and the nascent Trump campaign for president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 122–134.
62.
O’BrienR. (2017). Redistribution and the new fiscal sociology: Race and the progressivity of state and local taxes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(4), 1015–1049.
PiersonP. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.
68.
PinelloD. (1999). Linking party to judicial ideology in American courts: A meta-analysis. Justice System Journal, 20(3), 219–254.
69.
PoterbaJ. (1997). Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1), 48–66.
70.
PriestN.SlopenN.WoolfordS.PhilipJ.SingerD.KauffmanA.MoselyK.DavisM.RansomeY.WilliamsD. (2018). Stereotyping across intersections of race and age: Racial stereotyping among White adults working with children. PLOS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201696
71.
RebellM. A. (2009). Courts and kids: Pursuing educational equity through the state courts. University of Chicago Press.
72.
RigbyE.HatchM. (2017). For Richer or Poorer: The politics of redistribution in bad economic times. Political Research Quarterly, 70(3), 590–603.
73.
RosenbergG. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change?University Of Chicago Press.
SegalJ.SpaethH. (2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. Cambridge University Press.
77.
SkowronekS. (2000). The politics presidents make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Harvard University Press.
78.
SmithR. (1993). Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The multiple traditions in America. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 549–566.
79.
SossJ.FordingR.SchramS. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
80.
SulkinT. (2005). Issue politics in Congress. Cambridge University Press.
81.
TrounstineJ. (2018). Segregation by design: Local politics and inequality in American cities. Cambridge University Press.
82.
TurnerE. O. (2015). Districts’ responses to demographic change: Making sense of race, class, and immigration in political and organizational context. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 4–39.
WestM.PetersonP. (2007a). The adequacy lawsuit: A critical appraisal. In WestM.PetersonP. (Eds.), School money trials: The legal pursuit of educational adequacy (pp. 1–24). Brookings Institution Press.
86.
WestM.PetersonP. (Eds.). (2007b). School money trials: The legal pursuit of educational adequacy. Brookings Institution Press.
87.
WilkersonI. (2020). Caste: The origins of our discontents. Random House.
88.
WoodB.TheobaldN. (2003). Political responsiveness and equity in public education finance. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 718–738.
89.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
