Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The continuous improvement (CI) approach to systems change has rapidly spread across education policy circles in recent years and has been hailed as a promising means to achieve educational equity and social justice. CI’s highly routinized, scientific process for improving efficiency and productivity is a somewhat unexpected means to pursue equity. To understand this puzzle, I examine the use of CI to promote equity through two qualitative, multilevel case studies. I draw on institutional theory to understand how CI has integrated logics of racial equity and performance, and how local actors have improvised novel approaches. This analysis illuminates the complex institutional dynamics at play with CI implementation and identifies the challenges and promise of using CI to promote educational equity.

Keywords

continuous improvement institutional theory educational equity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

E. R.

Colyvas

J. A.

(2021). What sticks and why? A MoRe Institutional Framework for Education Research. Teachers College Record, 123(7), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300705

Anfara

V. A.

Jr. Evans

K. R.

Lester

J. N.

(2013). Restorative justice in education: What we know so far. Middle School Journal, 44(5), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2013.11461873

Bacharach

S. B.

Bamberger

Sonnenstuhl

W. J.

(1996). The organizational transformation process: The micropolitics of dissonance reduction and the alignment of logics of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 477–506. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393939

Baker

B. D.

Corcoran

S. P.

(2012). The stealth inequities of school funding: How state and local school finance systems perpetuate inequitable student spending. Center for American Progress.

Becker

M. C.

(2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026

Berwick

D. M.

(2008). The science of improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(10), 1182–1184. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.10.1182

Bessant

Caffyn

Gilbert

Harding

Webb

(1994). Rediscovering continuous improvement. Technovation, 14(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90067-1

Bhuiyan

Baghel

(2005). An overview of continuous improvement: From the past to the present. Management Decision, 43(5), 761–771. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740510597761

Bobo

Oliver

M. L.

Johnson

J. H.

Jr. Valenzuela

(2000). Prismatic metropolis: inequality in Los Angeles. Russell Sage Foundation.

10.

Booher-Jennings

(2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002231

11.

Boser

Wilhelm

Hanna

(2014). The power of the Pygmalion effect: Teachers’ expectations strongly predict college completion. Center for American Progress.

12.

Bridwell-Mitchell

E. N.

Sherer

D. G.

(2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716677567

13.

Bryk

A. S.

Gomez

Grunow

(2010). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

14.

Bryk

A. S.

Gomez

L. M.

Grunow

LeMahieu

P. G.

(2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

15.

Bush-Mecenas

S. C.

Marsh

J. A.

(2018). The DIVE approach: Using case-ordered metamatrices and theory-based displays to analyze multiple case study data. In Lochmiller

(Ed.), Complementary research methods for educational leadership and policy studies (pp. 33–56). Palgrave MacMillan.

16.

Carter

P. L.

Welner

K. G.

(Eds.). (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. Oxford University Press.

17.

Castro

E. L.

(2015). Addressing the conceptual challenges of equity work: A blueprint for getting started. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2015(172), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.20159

18.

Chakrabarti

Schwartz

(2013). Unintended consequences of school accountability policies: Evidence from Florida and implications for New York. Economic Policy Review, 19(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2324231

19.

Colyvas

J. A.

Jonsson

(2011). Ubiquity and legitimacy: Disentangling diffusion and institutionalization. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01386.x

20.

Cowen

Goldhaber

Theobald

(2017). Teacher equity gaps in Massachusetts. ESE Policy Brief. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

21.

Cuban

(1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019001003

22.

Dannals

J. E.

Miller

D. T.

(2017). Social norms in organizations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.139

23.

Darling-Hammond

(2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “No Child Left Behind.” Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320701503207

24.

Darling-Hammond

Friedlaender

(2008). Creating excellent and equitable schools. Educational Leadership, 65(8), 14–21. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ796360

25.

Darling-Hammond

Wilhoit

Pittenger

(2014). Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, Article 86. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n86.2014

26.

Dauber

S. L.

Alexander

K. L.

Entwisle

D. R.

(1996). Tracking and transitions through the middle grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education, 69(4), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112716

27.

Dee

T. S.

Jacob

B. A.

Schwartz

N. L.

(2013). The effects of NCLB on school resources and practices. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 252–279. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712467080

28.

Figlio

D. N.

(2006). Testing, crime and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4–5), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.01.003

29.

Flores

(2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? High School Journal, 91(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2007.0022

30.

Friedland

Alford

R. R.

(1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In Powell

W. W.

DiMaggio

P. J.

(Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.

31.

Garcia

E. E.

(2001). Hispanic education in the United States: Raíces y alas. Rowman & Littlefield.

32.

Garner

Thorne

J. K.

Horn

I. S.

(2017). Teachers interpreting data for instructional decisions: Where does equity come in? Journal of Educational Administration, 55(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2016-0106

33.

Gay

(2007). The rhetoric and reality of NCLB. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320701503256

34.

Gorski

P. C.

(2017). Equity literacy for educators: Definition and abilities. EdChange and the Equity Literacy Institute. George Mason University.

35.

Gorski

P. C.

Swalwell

(2015). Equity literacy for all. Educational Leadership, 72(6), 34–40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062914

36.

Gotanda

(2004). Reflections on Korematsu, Brown and White innocence. Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review, 13, 663–674.

37.

Grant

C. A.

Ladson-Billings

(1997). Dictionary of multicultural education. Oryx Press.

38.

Greenwood

Raynard

Kodeih

Micelotta

E. R.

Lounsbury

(2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299

39.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

Jaramillo

N. E.

(2006). Looking for educational equity: The consequences of relying on brown. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2006.00081.x

40.

Hallett

(2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409357044

41.

Hashim

A. K.

Strunk

K. O.

Dhaliwal

T. K.

(2018). Justice for all? Suspension bans and restorative justice programs in the Los Angeles Unified School District. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2018.1435040

42.

Horn

I. S.

(2018). Accountability as a design for teacher learning: Sensemaking about mathematics and equity in the NCLB era. Urban Education, 53(3), 382–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916646625

43.

Ingram

Louis

K. S.

Schroeder

R. G.

(2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258–1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00379.x

44.

Irvine

J. J.

York

D. E.

(1993). Teacher perspectives: Why do African-American, Hispanic and Vietnamese students fail? In Rothstein

S. W.

(Ed.), Handbook of schooling in urban America (pp. 161–173). Greenwood Press.

45.

Jacob

B. A.

Levitt

S. D.

(2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 843–877. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698441

46.

Jennings

J. L.

Bearak

J. M.

(2014). “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB era: How test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554449

47.

Jennings

J. L.

Sohn

(2014). Measure for measure: How proficiency-based accountability systems affect inequality in academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 87(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714525787

48.

Johansen

C. B.

Waldorff

S. B.

(2017). What are institutional logics—and where is the perspective taking us? In Krücken

Mazza

Meyer

R. E.

Walgenbach

(Eds.), New themes in institutional analysis: Topics and issues from European research (pp. 51–76). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716875

49.

Jones

B. D.

Egley

R. J.

(2004). Voices from the frontlines: Teachers’ perceptions of high stakes testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n39.2004

50.

Judson

(2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education, 97(4), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21058

51.

Knight

D. S.

(2017). Are high-poverty school districts disproportionately impacted by state funding cuts? School finance equity following the great recession. Journal of Education Finance, 43(2), 169–194. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1263100#

52.

Kohn

(1993). Turning learning into a business: Concerns about total quality. Educational Leadership, 51(1), 58–61. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ468690

53.

Koretz

D. M.

(1996). Perceived effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Distribution Services, RAND Corporation.

54.

Kozol

(2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. Three Rivers Press.

55.

Ladd

H. F.

(2008). Reflections on equity, adequacy, and weighted student funding. Education Finance and Policy, 3(4), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2008.3.4.402

56.

Ladson-Billings

(2004). Landing on the wrong note: The price we paid for Brown. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007003

57.

Ladson-Billings

(2013). Lack of achievement or loss of opportunity. In Carter

P. L.

Weldner

K. G.

(Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. Oxford University Press.

58.

LeMahieu

P. G.

Bryk

A. S.

Grunow

Gomez

L. M.

(2017). Working to improve: Seven approaches to improvement science in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0086

59.

Madaus

G. R

West

M. M.

Harmon

M. C

Lomax

R. G.

Viator

K. A.

(1992). The influence of testing on teaching math and science in grades 4–12. Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.

60.

Marsh

J. A.

Bush-Mecenas

Hough

(2017). Learning from early adopters in the new accountability era: Insights from California’s CORE waiver districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 327–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16688064

61.

Mayer

D. P.

Mullens

J. E.

Moore

M. T.

(2000). Monitoring school quality: An indicators report, NCES 2001-030. National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001030.pdf

62.

Mehta

(2013). How paradigms create politics: The transformation of American educational policy, 1980–2001. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 285–324. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212471417

63.

Merriam

S. B.

(1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case Study Research in Education.”Jossey-Bass.

64.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.

65.

Noguera

P. A.

(2009). The trouble with Black boys . . . And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. Wiley.

66.

Oakes

(1995). Two cities’ tracking and within-school segregation. Teachers College Record, 96(4), 681–690. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ510926

67.

Park

Hironaka

Carver

Nordstrum

(2013). Continuous improvement in education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

68.

Piderit

S. K.

(2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.2307/259206

69.

Prawat

R. S.

(1996). Learning community, commitment and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027980280105

70.

Price

H. E.

(2010). Does No Child Left Behind really capture school quality? Evidence from an urban school district. Educational Policy, 24(5), 779–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904810376564

71.

Rao

Giorgi

(2006). Code breaking: How entrepreneurs exploit cultural logics to generate institutional change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 269–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27007-2

72.

Ravitch

(2000). The great school wars: A history of the New York City public schools. JHU Press.

73.

Reardon

(2008). Differential growth in the Black-White achievement gap during elementary school among initially high-and low-scoring students (Working Paper No. 7). Institute for Research on Education Policy & Practice.

74.

Reardon

S. F.

Galindo

(2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333184

75.

Results for America. (2018). ESSA leverage points: 50-State report on promising practice for using evidence to improve student outcomes. https://results4america.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/RFA-ESSA-50-State-Report_final.pdf

76.

Russell

J. L.

(2011). From child’s garden to academic press: The role of shifting institutional logics in redefining kindergarten education. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 236–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372135

77.

Sarason

S. B.

(1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change.”Teachers College Press.

78.

Schneiberg

Soule

S. A.

(2005). Institutionalization as a contested, multilevel process: The case of rate regulation in American fire insurance. In Davis

G. F.

McAdam

Scott

W. R.

Zald

M. N.

(Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 122–160). Cambridge University Press.

79.

Scott

Wells

A. S.

(2013). A more perfect union: Reconciling school choice and equality of opportunity goals. In Carter

P. L.

Weldner

K. G.

(Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. Oxford University Press.

80.

Scott

W. R.

(1995). Institutions and organizations: Foundations for organizational science. Sage.

81.

Scott

W. R.

(2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage.

82.

Seo

M. G.

Creed

W. D.

(2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353

83.

Smith

M. L.

(1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020005008

84.

Spillane

J. P.

(2012). Distributed leadership (Vol. 4). Wiley.

85.

Spillane

J. P.

Parise

L. M.

Sherer

J. Z.

(2011). Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms policy, school administration, and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 586–619. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210385102

86.

Strutchens

M. E.

Lubienski

McGraw

Westbrook

S. K.

(2004). NAEP findings regarding race/ethnicity: Students’ performance, school experiences, attitudes and beliefs, and family influences. In Kloosterman

Lester

F. K.

(Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 269–304). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

87.

Taylor

F. W.

(1914). The principles of scientific management. Harper.

88.

Thornton

P. H.

(2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford University Press.

89.

Thornton

P. H.

Ocasio

(1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361

90.

Thornton

P. H.

Ocasio

(2008). Institutional logics. In Greenwood

Oliver

Suddaby

Sahlin

(eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–128). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4

91.

Thornton

P. H.

Ocasio

Lounsbury

(2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press on Demand.

92.

Walkey

F. H.

McClure

Meyer

L. H.

Weir

K. F.

(2013). Low expectations equal no expectations: Aspirations, motivation, and achievement in secondary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.004

93.

Wilkins

, & Education Trust Staff. (2006). Yes we can: Telling truths and dispelling myths about race and education in America. Education Trust. http://www2.edtrust.org/NR/rdonlyres/DD58DD01-23A4-4B89-9FD8-CllBB07233lE/0/YesWeCan

94.

Yin

R. K.

(2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.42 MB

“The Business of Teaching and Learning”: Institutionalizing Equity in Educational Organizations Through Continuous Improvement

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material