Happy Together? The Peer Effects of Dual Enrollment Students on Community College Student Outcomes

Abstract

Nationally, 15% of first-time community college students were high school dual enrollment (DE) students, which raises concerns about how high school peers might influence college enrollees. Using administrative data from a large state community college system, we examine whether being exposed to a higher percentage of DE peers in entry-level (gateway) math and English courses influences non-DE enrollees’ performance. Using a two-way fixed effects model, our results indicate that college enrollees exposed to a higher proportion of DE peers had lower pass rates and grades in gateway courses, and higher course repetition rates. Supplemental student-level analysis suggests that greater exposure to DE peers during a student's initial semester in college reduces next-term college persistence.

Keywords

dual enrollment community college peer effects quasi-experimental methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Dadgar

(2012). Does dual enrollment increase students’ success in college? Evidence from a quasi-experimental analysis of dual enrollment in New York City. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(158), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20010

B. P.

(2013). The impact of dual enrollment on college degree attainment: Do low-SES students benefit? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712461933

B. P.

Taylor

J. L.

(2019). A review of empirical studies on dual enrollment: Assessing educational outcomes. In Paulsen

M. B.

Perna

L. W.

(Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 34, pp. 99–151). Springer.

Andrews

H. A.

Marshall

R. P.

(1991). Challenging high school honor students with community college courses. Community College Review, 19(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155219101900109

Azim

Sandra

(2019). Dual enrollment: Participation and characteristics. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019176

Bailey

Jeong

D. W.

Cho

S. W.

(2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.002

Betts

J. R.

Zau

(2004). Peer groups and academic achievement: Panel evidence from administrative data [Unpublished manuscript].

Booij

A. S.

Leuven

Oosterbeek

(2017). Ability peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 84(2), 547–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdw045

Boozer

Cacciola

S. E.

(2001). Inside the “black box” of Project STAR: Estimation of peer effects using experimental data (Center Discussion Paper No. 832). Economic Growth Center, Yale University.

10.

Borman

G. D.

Hewes

G. M.

(2002). The long-term effects and cost-effectiveness of Success for All. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024004243

11.

Boswell

(2001). State policy and postsecondary enrollment options: Creating seamless systems. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2001(113), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.3

12.

Brunello

De Paola

Scoppa

(2010). Peer effects in higher education: Does the field of study matter? Economic Inquiry, 48(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00235.x

13.

Burke

M. A.

Sass

T. R.

(2013). Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/666653

14.

Calcagno

J. C.

Crosta

Bailey

Jenkins

(2007). Does age of entrance affect community college completion probabilities? Evidence from a discrete-time hazard model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(3), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707306026

15.

Carrell

S. E.

Fullerton

R. L.

West

J. E.

(2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1086/600143

16.

Catron

(2001). Dual enrollment in Virginia. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2001(113), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/cc.8

17.

College Board. (2017). College credit in high school (Working Group Report). https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/pdf/research/college-credit-high-school-working-group-report.pdf

18.

Conley

D. T.

(2008). Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education, 2008(144), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.321

19.

Denning

J. T.

Murphy

Weinhardt

(2020). Class rank and long-run outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 27468). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w27468.pdf

20.

Duflo

Dupas

Kremer

(2011). Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1739–1774. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1739

21.

Elsner

Isphording

I. E.

(2017). A big fish in a small pond: Ability rank and human capital investment. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(3), 787–828. https://doi.org/10.1086/690714

22.

Ficano

C. C.

(2012). Peer effects in college academic outcomes—Gender matters! Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1102–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.07.012

23.

Fink

(2018, November 5). How does access to dual enrollment and Advanced Placement vary by race and gender across states? [Blog post]. Community College Research Center. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/easyblog/access-dual-enrollment-advanced-placement-race-gender.html

24.

Fink

Jenkins

Yanagiura

(2017). What happens to students who take community college “dual enrollment” courses in high school? Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

25.

Freeman

T. M.

Anderman

L. H.

Jensen

J. M.

(2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203-220

26.

Garcia

H. A.

Eicke

McNaughtan

Harwood

(2020). Understanding dual credit programs: Perspectives from faculty, staff, and administrators. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(8), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1626301

27.

Gerber

(1987, May 19). High school/college brief (Supplement to AACJC Letter, No. 242). American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.

28.

Giani

Alexander

Reyes

(2014). Exploring variation in the impact of dual-credit coursework on postsecondary outcomes: A quasi-experimental analysis of Texas students. High School Journal, 97(4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2014.0007

29.

Hemelt

S. W.

Schwartz

N. L.

Dynarski

S. M.

(2020). Dual-credit courses and the road to college: Experimental evidence from Tennessee. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(3), 686–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22180

30.

Herzog

(2005). Measuring determinants of student return vs. dropout/stopout vs. transfer: A first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 46(8), 883–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-6933-7

31.

Holmes

W. H.

(1912). School organization and the individual child: A book for school executives and teachers, being an exposition of plans that have been evolved to adapt school organization to the needs of individual children, normal, supernormal and subnormal. Davis Press.

32.

Horn

Nevill

(2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions, 2003–04: With a special analysis of community college students (NCES 2006-184). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.

33.

Hoxby

(2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation (NBER Working Paper No. 7867). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7867/w7867.pdf

34.

Hoxby

C. M.

Avery

(2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students (NBER Working Paper No. 18586). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w18586/w18586.pdf

35.

Hoxby

C. M.

Weingarth

(2005). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects (NBER Working Paper No. 7867). National Bureau of Economic Research.

36.

Hughes

K. L.

Edwards

(2012). Teaching and learning in the dual enrollment classroom. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(158), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20012

37.

Imberman

S. A.

Kugler

A. D.

Sacerdote

B. I.

(2012). Katrina’s children: Evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2048–2082. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.5.2048

38.

Jenkins

(2013, February 12). Serving our dual-enrollment students. Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/serving-our-dual-enrollment-students/

39.

Jones

S. J.

(2014). Student participation in dual enrollment and college success. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2010.532449

40.

Jordan

W. J.

Cavalluzzo

Corallo

(2006). Community college and high school reform: Lessons from five case studies. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(9), 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411890500207530

41.

Karp

M. M.

(2012). “I don't know, I've never been to college!” Dual enrollment as a college readiness strategy. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(158), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20011

42.

Karp

M. M.

Calcagno

J. C.

Hughes

K. L.

Jeong

D. W.

Bailey

T. R.

(2007). The postsecondary achievement of participants in dual enrollment: An analysis of student outcomes in two states. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

43.

Kimbrough

E. O.

McGee

A. D.

Shigeoka

(2017). How do peers impact learning? an experimental investigation of peer-to-peer teaching and ability tracking (No. w23439). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23439

44.

Kooreman

(2007). Time, money, peers, and parents; some data and theories on teenage behavior. Journal of Population Economics, 20(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0121-8

45.

Lavy

Paserman

M. D.

Schlosser

(2011). Inside the black box of ability peer effects: Evidence from variation in the proportion of low achievers in the classroom. Economic Journal, 122(559), 208–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02463.x

46.

Lavy

Silva

Weinhardt

(2009). The good, the bad and the average: Evidence on the scale and nature of ability peer effects in schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(2), 367–414. https://doi.org/10.1086/663592

47.

Lefgren

(2004). Educational peer effects and the Chicago public schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.010

48.

Lyle

D. S.

(2007). Estimating and interpreting peer and role model effects from randomly assigned social groups at West Point. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.2.289

49.

Manski

C. F.

(1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123

50.

Marsh

H. W.

Seaton

Trautwein

Lüdtke

Hau

K.-T.

O’Mara

A. J.

Craven

R. G.

(2008). The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6

51.

Miller

Kosiewicz

Tanenbaum

Atchison

Knight

Ratway

Delhommer

Levin

(2018). Dual-credit education programs in Texas: Phase II. American Institutes for Research.

52.

Mokher

C. G.

McLendon

M. K.

(2009). Uniting secondary and postsecondary education: An event history analysis of state adoption of dual enrollment policies. American Journal of Education, 115(2), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/595668

53.

Murphy

Weinhardt

(2018). Top of the class: The importance of ordinal rank (NBER Working Paper No. 24958). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w24958/w24958.pdf

54.

Ost

(2010). The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the sciences. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011

55.

Ostrove

J. M.

Long

S. M.

(2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 363–389. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2007.0028

56.

Ran

F. X.

(2019). Does contractual form matter? The impact of different types of non-tenure-track faculty on college students’ academic outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 54(4), 1081–1120. https://doi.org/ 10.3368/jhr.54.4.0117.8505R

57.

Reed

(2018, October 18). What nobody told me about dual enrollment. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/confessions-community-college-dean/what-nobody-told-me-about-dual-enrollment

58.

Sacerdote

(2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144131

59.

Sacerdote

(2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? In Hanushek

E. A.

Manchin

Woessmann

(Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 249–277). Elsevier.

60.

Sacerdote

(2014). Experimental and quasi-Experimental analysis of peer effects: Two steps forward? Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-071813-104217

61.

Smith

(2017, May 31). Double-edged sword of dual enrollment. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/05/31/dual-enrollment-provides-boost-community-colleges-may-hide-extent-enrollment

62.

Speroni

(2011). High school dual enrollment programs: Are we fast-tracking students too fast? (NCPR Working Paper). National Center for Postsecondary Research. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/dual-enrollment-fast-tracking-students-too-fast.pdf

63.

Stinebrickner

T. R.

(2006). What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1435–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.002

64.

Strayhorn

T. L.

(2008). Sentido de pertenencia: A hierarchical analysis predicting sense of belonging among Latino college students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7(4), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192708320474

65.

Strayhorn

T. L.

(2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.

66.

U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Table 326.20. Graduation rate from first institution attended within 150 percent of normal time for first-time, full-time degree/certificate-seeking students at 2-year postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, sex, and control of institution: Selected cohort entry years, 2000 through 2014. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_326.20.asp

67.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2018). Public high schools with more students in poverty and smaller schools provide fewer academic offerings to prepare for college (Report No. GAO-19-8). https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/694961.pdf

68.

Whitmore

(2005). Resource and peer impacts on girls’ academic achievement: Evidence from a randomized experiment. American Economic Review, 95(2), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670158

69.

Witkowsky

Clayton

(2019). What makes dual enrollment work? High school counselor perspectives. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(6), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1610676

70.

(2019). Academic performance in community colleges: The influences of part-time and full-time instructors. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 368–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218796131

71.

Zimmer

(2003). A new twist in the educational tracking debate. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00055-9

72.

Zimmerman

D. J.

(2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677

73.

Zinth

(2015). State approaches to funding dual enrollment. Education Commission of the States. http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/18/92/11892.pdf

74.

Zinth

(2016). Dual enrollment: Student eligibility requirements. Education Commission of the States. http://ecs.force.com/mbdata/MBQuestNB2?Rep=DE1507

75.

Zinth

Barnett

(2018). Rethinking dual enrollment to reach more students: Promising practices. Education Commission of the States. https://www.ecs.org/rethinking-dual-enrollment-to-reach-more-students/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB