Research suggests that school-based parent networks have significant benefits for children’s education, yet scholars know very little about how such relationships form and develop over time. This study uses interview and survey data with elementary school parents in predominantly low-income Latinx communities to examine how parents meet one another; how deeper, more trusting relationships develop; and how the size and quality of parent networks change over time in the presence and absence of a family engagement program. Interview data suggest few and infrequent opportunities for parents to meet one another, which makes building relationships characterized by trust and shared expectations more difficult. The quantitative results show positive short-term effects of the program but differential effects over time.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of color. Urban Education, 42(3), 250–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907300433
2.
BennettP. R.LutzA. C.JayaramL. (2012). Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources, and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation. Sociology of Education, 85(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711431585
3.
BolívarJ. M.ChrispeelsJ. H. (2011). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 4–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210366466
4.
CarbonaroW. J. (1998). A little help from my friend’s parents: Intergenerational closure and educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 71(4), 295–313.
5.
CarreónG. P.DrakeC.BartonA. C. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 465–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042003465
6.
ChrispeelsJ. H.RiveroE. (2001). Engaging Latino families for student success: How parent education can reshape parents’ sense of place in the education of their children. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 119–169. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje7602_7
7.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
8.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Belknap.
9.
CookK. S. (2005). Networks, norms, and trust: The social psychology of social capital*2004 Cooley Mead Award address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800102
10.
CreswellJ. W.KlassenA. C.Plano ClarkV. L.SmithK. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. National Institutes of Health.
11.
D’AgostinoJ. V.RodgersE. (2017). Literacy achievement trends at entry to first grade. Educational Researcher, 46(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x17697274
12.
DeeT. S.MurphyM. (2019). Vanished classmates: The effects of local immigration enforcement on school enrollment. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219860816
13.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1991). Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment. American Journal of Education, 100(1), 20–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1085651
14.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1992). School matters in the Mexican-American home: Socializing children to education. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003495
15.
DesimoneL. (1999). Linking parent involvement with student achievement: Do race and income matter?Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597625
16.
DesmondM. (2012). Disposable ties and the urban poor. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1295–1335. https://doi.org/10.1086/663574
17.
DiPreteT. A.EirichG. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127
18.
EeJ.GándaraP. (2019). The impact of immigration enforcement on the nation’s schools. American Educational Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219862998
19.
FasangA. E.ManginoW.BrücknerH. (2014). Social closure and educational attainment. Sociological Forum, 29(1), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12073
20.
FehrB. (1996). Friendship processes. Sage.
21.
GamoranA.TurleyR. N. L.TurnerA.FishR. (2012). Differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic families in social capital and child development: First-year findings from an experimental study. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.08.001
22.
Garcia-ReidP.ReidR. J.PetersonN. A. (2005). School engagement among Latino youth in an urban middle school context: Valuing the role of social support. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124505275534
23.
GoddardR. D. (2003). Relational networks, social trust, and norms: A social capital perspective on students’ chances of academic success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025001059
24.
GoldenbergC.GallimoreR.ReeseL.GarnierH. (2001). Cause or effect? A longitudinal study of immigrant Latino parents’ aspirations and expectations, and their children’s school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 547–582. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003547
25.
GreenB. L.FurrerC.McAllisterC. (2007). How do relationships support parenting? effects of attachment style and social support on parenting behavior in an at-risk population. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9127-y
26.
GuerraN. G.KnoxL. (2008). How culture impacts the dissemination and implementation of innovation: A case study of the Families and Schools Together program (FAST) for preventing violence with immigrant Latino youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9161-4
27.
HaganJ.MacMillanR.WheatonB. (1996). New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096354
28.
HillN. E.JeffriesJ. R.MurrayK. P. (2017). New tools for old problems: Inequality and educational opportunity for ethnic minority youth and parents. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217730618
29.
HillN. E.TorresK. (2010). Negotiating the American Dream: The paradox of aspirations and achievement among Latino students and engagement between their families and schools. Journal of Social Issues, 66(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01635.x
30.
HorvatE. M.WeiningerE. B.LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002319
IshimaruA. M.TorresK. E.SalvadorJ. E.LottJ.WilliamsD. M. C.TranC. (2016). Reinforcing deficit, journeying toward equity: Cultural brokering in family engagement initiatives. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 850–882. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216657178
33.
JasisP. M.Ordoñez-JasisR. (2012). Latino parent involvement: Examining commitment and empowerment in schools. Urban Education, 47(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911416013
34.
JeynesW. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124502239392
35.
JeynesW. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906293818
36.
Jiménez-CastellanosO.OchoaA. M.OlivosE. M. (2016). Operationalizing transformative parent engagement in Latino school communities: A case study. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies, 8(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.18085/1549-9502-8.1.93
37.
JonesK. (2004). Trust and terror. In DesAutelsP.WalkerM. U. (Eds.), Moral psychology: Feminist ethics and social theory (pp. 3–18). Rowman & Littlefield.
38.
KimY. (2009). Minority parental involvement and school barriers: Moving the focus away from deficiencies of parents. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.02.003
39.
KiyamaJ. M. (2010). College aspirations and limitations: The role of educational ideologies and funds of knowledge in Mexican American families. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 330–356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209357468
40.
KlassenA. C.CreswellJ.Plano ClarkV. L.SmithK. C.MeissnerH. I. (2012). Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0122-x
41.
LangenkampA. G. (2019). Latino/a immigrant parents’ educational aspirations for their children. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1365054
MarinG.SabogalF.MarinB. V.Otero-SabogalR.Perez-StableE. J. (1987). Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005
44.
McDonaldL. (2008). Children families and schools-NICHD-WCER FAST manual. FAST National Training and Evaluation Center.
McNealR. B.Jr. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out*. Social Forces, 78(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/78.1.117
47.
MeyersM. K.JordanL. P. (2006). Choice and accommodation in parental child care decisions. Community Development, 37(2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490207
48.
MorganS. L.SorensenA. B. (1999). Parental networks,social closure, and mathematics learning: A test of Coleman’s social capital explanation of school effects. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 661–681. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2657368
49.
MorganS. L.ToddJ. J. (2009). Intergenerational closure and academic achievement in high school: A new evaluation of Coleman’s conjecture. Sociology of Education, 82(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070908200304
50.
NogueraP. A. (2001). Transforming urban schools through investments in the social capital of parents. In SaegertS.ThompsonJ. P.WarrenM. R. (Eds.), Social capital and poor communities (pp. 189–212). Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11(3), 474–498.
52.
PerreiraK. M.ChapmanM. V.SteinG. L. (2006). Becoming an American parent: Overcoming challenges and finding strength in a new immigrant Latino community. Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1383–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x06290041
53.
PongS.-L. (1998). The school compositional effect of single parenthood on 10th-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 71(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673220
54.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2014). Immigrant America: A portrait (6th ed.). University of California Press.
55.
PribeshS.DowneyD. B. (1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance?Demography, 36(4), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648088
56.
RangelD. E.ValdezC. R. (2017). A culturally sensitive approach to large-scale prevention studies: A case study of a randomized controlled trial with low-income Latino communities. Journal of Primary Prevention, 38(6), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-017-0487-2
57.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2d ed.). Sage.
58.
ReamR. K. (2005). Toward understanding how social capital mediates the impact of mobility on Mexican American achievement. Social Forces, 84(1), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0121
59.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
60.
SharkeyP.FaberJ. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043350
61.
ShojiM. N.HaskinsA. R.RangelD. E.SorensenK. N. (2014). The emergence of social capital in low-income Latino elementary schools. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.07.003
62.
SmallM. L. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford University Press.
63.
Stanton-SalazarR. D.SpinaS. U. (2003). Informal mentors and role models in the lives of urban Mexican-origin adolescents. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 34(3), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2003.34.3.231
64.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12–28.
65.
TurleyR. N. L.GamoranA.McCartyA. T.FishR. (2017). Reducing children’s behavior problems through social capital: A causal assessment. Social Science Research, 61, 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.015
66.
ValdésG. (2017). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools: An ethnographic portrait. Teachers College Press.
67.
ValenzuelaA. (2010). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. SUNY Press.
68.
VerbruggeL. M. (1983). A research note on adult friendship contact: A dyadic perspective. Social Forces, 62(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578348
69.
WarrenM. R.HongS.RubinC. H.UyP. S. (2009). Beyond the bake sale: A community-based relational approach to parent engagement in schools. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2209–2254.
