Schools differentially sort students into special education by race, though researchers debate the extent to which this is caused by racist school practices versus variation in student need due to other racial inequalities. I test the interaction between school-level racial composition and student-level race as a predictor of special education receipt. I find that as the proportion of White students increases, the risk of lower-status disabilities, such as intellectual disability, increases for Black, Latinx, and Native American students. As the proportion of White students decreases, White students’ risk of higher-status disabilities, such as speech/language impairment, increases relative to students of color. Thus, in the context of racial distinctiveness, student race becomes salient to sorting into special education.
ArtilesA. J. (2011). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational equity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher, 40, 431–445. doi:/10.3102/0013189X11429391
BalA.Betters-BubonJ.FishR. E. (2017). A multilevel analysis of statewide disproportionality in exclusionary discipline and the identification of emotional disturbance. Education and Urban Society. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/0013124517716260
4.
BatesL. A.GlickJ. E. (2013). Does it matter if teachers and schools match the student? Racial and ethnic disparities in problem behaviors. Social Science Research, 42, 1180–1190. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.005
5.
BerendsM.LucasS. R.PenalozaR. V. (2008). How changes in families and schools are related to trends in Black-White test scores. Sociology of Education, 81, 313–344. doi:10.1177/003804070808100401
6.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Wiley
7.
BlanchettW. J. (2010). Telling it like it is: The role of race, class, and culture in the perpetuation of learning disability as a privileged category for the White middle class. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30. doi:10.18061/dsq.v30i2.1233
8.
BlumerH. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7. doi:10.2307/1388607
9.
BoboL. (1983). Whites’ opposition to busing: Symbolic racism or realistic group conflict?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1196–1210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1196
10.
BormanK. M.EitleT. M.MichaelD.EitleD. J.LeeR.JohnsonL.. . . ShircliffeB. (2004). Accountability in a postdesegregation era: The continuing significance of racial segregation in Florida’s schools. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 605–631. doi:10.3102/00028312041003605
11.
BraddockJ. H. I. (1990). Tracking the middle grades: National patterns of grouping for instruction. The Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 445–449.
12.
BrinkmanW. B.ShermanS. N.ZmitrovichA. R.VisscherM. O.CrosbyL. E.PhelanK. J.DonovanE. F. (2009). Parental angst making and revisiting decisions about treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics, 124, 580–589. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2569
CharmanT.PicklesA.SimonoffE.ChandlerS.LoucasT.BairdG. (2011). IQ in children with autism spectrum disorders: Data from the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Psychological Medicine, 41, 619–627. doi:10.1017/S0033291710000991
15.
ConnorD. (2005). Integration and inclusion: A troubling nexus: Race, disability, and special education. Journal of African American History, 90, 107–127. doi:10.1086/JAAHv90n1-2p107
16.
ConradP. (1976). Identifying hyperactive children: The medicalization of deviant behavior. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
17.
CormierE. (2012). How parents make decisions to use medication to treat their child’s ADHD: A grounded theory study. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 18, 345–356. doi:10.1177/1078390312466918
18.
CoutinhoM.OswaldD.BestA. (2002). The influence of sociodemographics and gender on the disproportionate identification of minority students as having learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 49–59. doi:10.1177/074193250202300107
19.
CrosnoeR. (2009). Low-income students and the socioeconomic composition of public high schools. American Sociological Review, 74, 709–730. doi:10.1177/000312240907400502
20.
DavisJ. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men, 72, 17–31. doi:10.2307/2775756
21.
DominaT.HanselmanP.HwangN.McEachinA. (2016). Detracking and tracking up: Mathematics course placements in California middle schools, 2003-2013. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 1229–1266. doi:10.3102/000283121 6650405
22.
DominaT.PennerA.PennerE. (2017). Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 311–330. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053354
23.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24.
Dudley-MarlingC. C. (2004). The social construction of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 482–489. doi:10.1177/00222194040370060201
25.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded–is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35(1), 5–22.
26.
EdwardsL. (2016). Homogeneity and inequality: School discipline inequality and the role of racial composition. Social Forces, 95, 55–76. doi:10.1093/sf/sow038
27.
EitleT. M. (2002). Special education or racial segregation: Understanding variation in the representation of Black students in educable mentally handicapped programs. Sociological Quarterly, 43, 575–605. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2002.tb00067.x
28.
ErevellesN.MinearA. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4, 127–145. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2010.11
29.
EyalG. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic 1. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 863–907. doi:10.1086/668448
30.
FerriB.ConnorD. (2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re) segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107, 453–474. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00483.x
31.
FishR. E. (2017). The racialized construction of exceptionality: Experimental evidence of race/ethnicity effects on teachers’ interventions. Social Science Research, 62, 317–334. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.007
32.
FishR. E. (2019). Teacher race and racial disparities in special education. Remedial and Special Education. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/07419325 188104
GerberM. M.SemmelM. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–148. doi:10.1080/00461528409529290
35.
GillungT. B.RuckerC. N. (1977). Labels and teacher expectations. Exceptional Children, 43, 464–465.
36.
GoldsmithP. A. (2004). Schools’ racial mix, students’ optimism, and the Black-White and Latino-White achievement gaps. Sociology of Education, 77, 121–147. doi:10.1177/003804070407700202
37.
GottliebJ.AlterM. (1994). An analysis of referrals, placement, and progress of children with disabilities who attend New York City public schools. New York: New York University.
38.
GrandinT. (2008). The way I see it: A personal look at autism and Asperger’s. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.
GrissmerD.FlanaganA.WilliamsonS. (1998). Why did the Black-White score gap narrow in the 1970s and 1980s. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 182–228). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
41.
GuryanJ. (2004). Desegregation and Black dropout rates. American Economic Review, 94, 919–943. doi:10.1257/0002828042002679
42.
HanselmanP.BruchS. K.GamoranA.BormanG. D. (2014). Threat in context: School moderation of the impact of social identity threat on racial/ethnic achievement gaps. Sociology of Education, 87, 106–124. doi:10.1177/0038040714525970
43.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2002). Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities?Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 584–599. doi:10.2307/1602496
44.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2009). Harming the best: How schools affect the Black-White achievement gap. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 366–393. doi:10.1002/pam.20437
45.
HarryB.AndersonM. (1994). The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 602–619. doi:10.2307/2967298
46.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. (2007). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race & disability in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
HibelJ.FarkasG.MorganP. L. (2010). Who is placed into special education?Sociology of Education, 83, 312–332. doi:10.1177/0038040710383518
48.
HibelJJasperA. D. (2012). Delayed special education placement for learning disabilities among children of immigrants. Social Forces, 91, 503–530. doi:10.1093/sf/sos092
49.
IrizarryY. (2015). Selling students short: Racial differences in teachers’ evaluations of high, average, and low performing students. Social Science Research, 52, 522–538. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.04.002
50.
JussimL.EcclesJ.MadonS. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 281–388). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60240-3
51.
KauffmanJ. M.AnastasiouD. (2019). On cultural politics in special education: Is much of it justifiable?Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/1044207318822262
52.
KingM. D.JenningsJ.FletcherJ. M. (2014). Medical adaptation to academic pressure: Schooling, stimulant use, and socioeconomic status. American Sociological Review, 79, 1039–1066. doi:10.1177/0003122414553657
53.
LipskyM. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6, 391–409. doi:10.1177/107808747100600401
54.
LiuK.-Y. K.KingM. M.BearmanP. S. P. (2010). Social influence and the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1387–1434. doi:10.1086/651448
55.
LloydJ. W.KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J.RoeD. L. (1991). Why do teachers refer pupils for special education? An analysis of referral records. Exceptionality, 2, 115–126. doi:10.1080/09362839109524774
56.
LosenD.WelnerK. (2001). Disabling discrimination in our public schools: Comprehensive legal challenges to inappropriate and inadequate special education services for minority children. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 36, 407.
57.
LucasS.BerendsM. (2002). Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Sociology of Education, 75, 328–348. doi:10.2307/3090282
58.
MacMillanD.ReschlyD. (1998). Overrepresentation of minority students. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 15–24. doi:10.1177/002246699803200103
59.
MamlinN.HarrisK. R. (1998). Elementary teachers’ referral to special education in light of inclusion and prereferral: “Every child is here to learn . . . but some of these children are in real trouble.”Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 385–396. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.385
60.
MccallZ.SkrticT. (2009). Intersectional needs politics: A policy frame for the wicked problem of disproportionality. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11, 3–23.
61.
McDonaldK. E.KeysC. B.BalcazarF. E. (2007). Disability, race/ethnicity and gender: Themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 145–161. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9094-3
62.
McGrathD. J.KuriloffP. J. (1999). “They’re going to tear the doors off this place”: Upper-middle-class parent school involvement and the educational opportunities of other people’s children. Educational Policy, 13, 603–629. doi:10.1177/0895904899013005001
63.
McKownC.WeinsteinR. S. (2002). Modeling the role of child ethnicity and gender in children’s deifferential response to teacher expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 159–184. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01425.x
64.
MehanH. 1941, Hertweck, A. 1937, & Meihls, J. L. 1954. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
65.
MercerJ. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded: Clinical and social system perspectives on mental retardation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
66.
MickelsonR. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First-and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215–252. doi:10.3102/00028312038002215
67.
MickelsonR. A.BottiaM. C.LambertR. (2013). Effects of school racial composition on K-12 mathematics outcomes: A metaregression analysis. Review of Educational Research, 83, 121–158. doi:10.3102/0034654312475322
68.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.CookM.StrassfeldN. M.HillemeierM. M.PunW. H.SchusslerD. L. (2016). Are Black children disproportionately overrepresented in special education? A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 83, 181–198. doi:10.1177/0014402916664042
69.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MattisonR.MaczugaS.LiH.CookM. (2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44, 278–292. doi:10.3102/0013189X15591157
70.
MorganP. L.FriscoM.FarkasG.HibelJ. (2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 236–254. doi:10.1177/0022466908323007
71.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Children 3 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by type of disability: Selected years, 1976-77 through 2015-16. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_204.30.asp
72.
NogueraP. A. (2001). Racial politics and the elusive quest for excellence and equity in education. Education and Urban Society, 34, 18–41. doi:10.1177/0013124 501341003
73.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
74.
Ong-DeanC. (2006). High roads and low roads: Learning disabilities in California, 1976–1998. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 91–113. doi:10.1525/sop.2006.49.1.91
75.
Ong-DeanC. (2009). Distinguishing disability: Parents, privilege, and special education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76.
OswaldD.CoutinhoM.BestA.NguyenN. (2001). Impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the identification rates of minority students as having mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39, 351–367. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2001)039<0351:IOSCOT>2.0.CO;2
77.
PigottR. L.CowenE. L. (2000). Teacher race, child race, racial congruence, and teacher ratings of children’s school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 177–195. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00041-2
78.
ReidD. K.KnightM. G. (2006). Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in disability studies. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 18–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X035006018
79.
ReidD. K.ValleJ. W. (2004). The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent school relations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 466–481. doi:10.1177/00222194040370060101
80.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3, 16–20.
81.
RutherfordR. B.BullisM.AndersonC. W. (2002). Youth with disabilities in the correctional system: Prevalence rates and identification issues. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
82.
SaxL. (2003). Who first suggests the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?The Annals of Family Medicine, 1, 171–174. doi:10.1370/afm.3
83.
ShifrerD. (2018). Clarifying the social roots of the disproportionate classification of racial minorities and males with learning disabilities. Sociological Quarterly, 59, 384–406. doi:10.1080/00380253.2018.1479198
84.
ShifrerDCallahanR. M.MullerC. (2013). Equity or marginalization?American Educational Research Journal, 50, 656–682. doi:10.3102/0002831213479439
85.
ShifrerD.FishR. (2015, August). Differences across schools in otherwise similar students’ likelihood of placement into special education. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association annual conference, Chicago, IL.
86.
ShifrerD.MullerC.CallahanR. (2011). Disproportionality and learning disabilities: Parsing apart race, socioeconomic status, and language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 246–257. doi:10.1177/0022219410374236
87.
SkibaR. J.Poloni-StaudingerL.SimmonsA. B.Feggins-AzzizL. R.Choong-GeunC. (2005). Unproven links: Can poverty explain ethnic disproportionality in special education?39, 130–44. doi:10.1177/00224669050390030101.
88.
SleeterC. (1987). Why is there learning disabilities? A critical analysis of the birth of the field in its social context. In PopkewitzT. S. (Ed.), The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution (pp. 210–237). London, England: Falmer Press.
89.
SmithD. D.TylerN. C. (2015). Introduction to contemporary special education. London, England: Pearson.
90.
Special Education Longitudinal Study. (2005). Declassification—students who leave special education: A special topic report from the special education elementary longitudinal study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
91.
StaigerA. (2004). Whiteness as giftedness: Racial formation at an urban high school. Social Problems, 51, 161–181. doi:10.1525/sp.2004.51.2.161
92.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata [Computer software] (13th ed.). College Station, TX: Author.
93.
SullivanA. L.BalA. (2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on disability risk. Exceptional Children, 79, 475–494. doi:10.1177/001440291307900406
94.
ThomasA. (2000). Stability of Tringo’s hierarchy of preference toward disability groups: 30 years later. Psychological Reports, 86, 1155–1156. doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.86.3c.1155
95.
TringoJ. L. (1970). The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups. The Journal of Special Education, 4, 295–306. doi:10.1177/002246697000400306
96.
TysonK. (2011). Integration interrupted. In Tracking, Black students, and acting White after Brown. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
97.
TysonK.DarityW.Jr.CastellinoD. R. (2005). It’s not “a Black thing”: Understanding the burden of acting White and other dilemmas of high achievement. American Sociological Review, 70, 582–605. doi:10.1177/000312240 507000403
98.
U.S. Department of Education, & Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2010). Thirty-five years of progress in educating children with disabilities through IDEA. Washington, DC: Author.
99.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, & Office of Special Education Programs. (2015). 37th Annual report to congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education Act 2015. Washington, DC: Author.
100.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, & Office of Special Education Programs. (2016, December12). Fact sheet: Equity in IDEA. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/fact-sheet-equity-idea
101.
VannemanA.HamiltonL.AndersonJ. B.RahmanT. (2009). Achievement gaps: How Black and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505903.pdf
WellsA. S.SernaI. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schoolsHarvard Educational Review, 66, 93–119. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.274848214743t373
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
