A Look Inside Online Educational Settings in High School: Promise and Pitfalls for Improving Educational Opportunities and Outcomes

Abstract

This research examines online course-taking in high schools, which is increasingly used by students falling behind in progress toward graduation. The study looks inside educational settings to observe how online courses are used and assess whether students gain academically through their use. Drawing on 7 million records of online instructional sessions linked to student records, we find mostly negative associations between online course-taking and math and reading scores, with some gains in credits earned and grade point averages by upperclassmen. Those least prepared academically and with weaker course-taking behaviors fared more poorly and were likely set back by online course-taking. Limited resources constrained the implementation of district-recommended practices and instructional supports, such as live teacher interactions and individualized content assistance.

Keywords

online instruction credit recovery student engagement academic achievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

McEachin

(2017). Student enrollment patterns and achievement in Ohio’s online charter schools. Educational Researcher, 46, 44–57.

Archambault

Diamond

Coffey

Foures-Aalbu

Richardson

Zygouris-Coe

. . . Cavanaugh

(2010). INACOL Research Committee Issues Brief: An exploration of at-risk learners and online education. Vienna, VA: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.

Burch

Good

(2014). Equal scrutiny: Privatization and accountability in digital education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Burch

P. E.

Good

Heinrich

C. J.

(2016). Improving access to, quality and the effectiveness of digital instruction in K–12 education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 65–87.

Burch

P. E.

Heinrich

C. J.

(2015). Mixed methods for policy research and program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Becker

H. J.

(2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), 1–31.

Carr

(2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39–A41.

Catterall

J. S.

(1998). Risk and resilience in student transitions to high school. American Journal of Education, 106, 302–333.

Cavanaugh

DiPietro

Valdes

White

(2007). Conditions, processes, and consequences of 1:1 computing initiatives in 11 Florida districts. In Carlsen

McFerrin

Price

Weber

Willis

(Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 1425–1428). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

10.

Chingos

M. M.

Griffiths

R. J.

Mulhern

(2017). Can low-cost online summer math programs improve student preparation for college-level math? Evidence from randomized experiments at three universities. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 704–816.

11.

Cole

Kemple

J. J.

Segeritz

M. D.

(2012). Assessing the early impact of School of One: Evidence from three school-wide pilots. New York, NY: Research Alliance for New York City Schools.

12.

Collins

Halverson

(2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The Digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

13.

Corry

Dardick

Stella

(2016). An examination of dropout rates for Hispanic or Latino students enrolled in online K–12 schools. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17, 251–262.

14.

Darling-Hammond

Bransford

(Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

15.

Dillon

W. R.

Mulani

Frederick

D. G.

(1989). On the use of component scores in the presence of group structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 106–112.

16.

DiMaggio

P. J.

Hargittai

Celeste

Shafer

(2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In Neckerman

(Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

17.

Domina

Penner

(2017). Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 311–330.

18.

Enyedy

(2014). Personalized instruction: New interest, old rhetoric, limited results, and the need for a new direction for computer-mediated learning. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.

19.

Gemin

Pape

Vashaw

Watson

(2015). Keeping pace with K–12 digital learning. An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Education Group.

20.

Halverson

Barnicle

Hackett

Rawat

Rutledge

Kallio

. . . Mertes

(2015). Personalization in practice: Observations from the field (WCER Working Paper 2015-8). Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php

21.

Hannum

W. H.

Irvin

M. J.

Lei

Farmer

T. W.

(2008). Effectiveness of using learner-centered principles on student retention in distance education courses in rural schools. Distance Education, 29, 211–229.

22.

Heinrich

C. J.

Nisar

(2013). The efficacy of private sector providers in improving public educational outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 856–894.

23.

Heppen

J. B.

Sorensen

Allensworth

Walters

Rickles

Taylor

S. S.

Michelman

(2017). The struggle to pass algebra: Online vs. face-to-face credit recovery for at-risk urban students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 272–296.

24.

Hohlfeld

T. N.

Ritzhaupt

A. D.

Barron

A. E.

Kemker

(2008). Examining the digital divide in K–12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51, 1648–1663.

25.

Knight

D. B.

(2014). Reversing the logic: An outcomes-based student typology for determining “what works” in promoting an array of engineering-related student learning outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 145–169.

26.

Lee

Hannafin

M. J.

(2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 707–734.

27.

Malkus

(2018, March 7). The importance of boots on the ground in schools. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/opinion/knowledge-bank/articles/2018-03-07/listen-to-teachers-to-avoid-graduation-scandals-like-dc-public-schools

28.

Margolin

Kleidon

Williams

Schmidt

M. C.

(2011). Vermont’s Title II-D enhancing education through technology program: 2010–2011 final report. Los Angeles, CA: American Institute for Research.

29.

Massey

D. S.

(2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

30.

Means

Toyama

Murphy

Bakia

Jones

(2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service.

31.

Miles

Huberman

(1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

Milligan

G. W.

Cooper

M. C.

(1988). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 5, 181–204.

33.

Nasir

N.S.

Hand

V. M.

(2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 449–475.

34.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).

35.

Noonan

(2016, November 21). Online credit recovery that boosts graduation rates by failing students. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from https://edexcellence.net/articles/online-credit-recovery-that-boosts-graduation-rates-by-failing-students

36.

Orlikowski

W. J.

(2000). Using technology and constituting structures. Organization Science, 11, 404–428.

37.

Osguthorpe

R. T.

Graham

C. R.

(2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 227–233.

38.

Pane

J. F.

(2018). Strategies for implementing personalized learning while evidence and resources are underdeveloped. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE314.html

39.

Pane

J. F.

Steiner

Baird

Hamilton

Pane

J. D.

(2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

40.

Picciano

Seaman

(2009). K–12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up survey of the U.S. school district administrators. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.

41.

Powell

Roberts

Patrick

(2015). Using online learning for credit recovery: Getting back on track to graduation. Vienna, VA: International Association for K–12 Online Learning.

42.

Queen

Lewis

(2011). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2009–10. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

43.

Roblyer

M. D.

(2006). Virtually successful: Defeating the dropout problem through online school programs. Phi Delta Kappa, 88, 31–36.

44.

Saenz

V. B.

Hatch

Bukoski

B. E.

Kim

Lee

K. H.

Valdez

(2011). Community college student engagement patterns: A typology revealed through exploratory cluster analysis. Community College Review, 39, 235–267.

45.

Simpson

(2004). The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning. Open Learning, 19, 79–96.

46.

Smith

S. J.

Basham

J. D.

(2014). Designing online learning opportunities for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 127–137.

47.

Steinley

(2006). k-Means clustering: A half-century synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 1–34.

48.

Steinley

Brusco

M. J.

(2007). Initializing k-means batch clustering: A critical evaluation of several techniques. Journal of Classification, 24, 99–121.

49.

Stevens

Frazelle

Bisht

Hamilton

(2016). Online credit recovery: Enrollment and passing patterns in Montana Digital Academy courses. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest.

50.

U.S. Department of Education. (2008). High school graduation rate non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education.

51.

VanLehn

(2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197–221.

52.

Viano

(2018). Online learning as a remedy for course failure: An assessment of credit recovery as an intervention to earn credits and graduate from high school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Vanderbilt University Electronic Thesis and Dissertations. (URN: etd-05312018-143058)

53.

Ward

J. H.

(1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.

54.

Warschauer

Matuchniak

(2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179–225.

55.

Zhao

Lei

Yan

Tan

H. S.

Lai

(2005). What makes the difference: A practical analysis of effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836–1884.

56.

Zickuhr

Smith

(2012). Digital differences. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB