Eight states currently have bans on affirmative action, yet little research has focused on the characteristics of states that predict ban adoption. To begin filling this gap in the literature, I conduct discrete-time survival analysis on an aggregated data set of 47 states from 1995 to 2012 to investigate the extent to which various characteristics of a state predict its likelihood of adopting a statewide affirmative action ban. Results show that scarcity of access to state public flagship institutions and policy diffusion are associated with ban adoption. Aligning with the racial threat literature, the findings suggest that these bans are associated with concerns about the scarcity of access to selective higher education institutions (operationalized as state public flagships) for White students.
BackesB. (2012). Do affirmative action bans lower minority college enrollment and attainment? Evidence from statewide bans. Journal of Human Resources, 47, 435–455.
4.
BaileyM. A.RomM. C. (2004). A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics, 66, 326–347.
5.
BaldassarriD.GelmanA. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 408–446.
6.
BaumgartnerF. R.JonesB. D. (1993). Agenda setting and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BaybeckB. (2006). Sorting out the competing effects of racial context. Journal of Politics, 68, 386–396.
8.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84, 394–415.
9.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In SabatierP. A. (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 223–260). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
10.
BerryW. D.RingquistE. J.FordingR. C.HansonR. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–1993. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 327–348.
11.
BlalockH. M. (1967). Towards a theory of minority group relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
BlumeG. H.LongM. C. (2014). Changes in levels of affirmative action in college admissions in response to statewide bans and judicial rulings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 228–252.
13.
BoundJ.LovenheimM.TurnerS. (2009). Why have college completion rates declined? An analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources (Working paper #15566). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
BowenW. G.BokD. (1998). The shape of the river. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. W.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
BrantonR. P. (2003). Examining individual-level voting behavior on state ballot propositions. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 367–377.
17.
BrintS. (1984). “New-class” and cumulative trend explanations of the liberal political attitudes of professionals. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 30–71.
18.
BuffardiA. L.PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R. (2015). Shopping or specialization? Venue targeting among nonprofits engaged in advocacy. Policy Studies Journal, 43, 188–206.
19.
California Secretary of State. (n.d.). Prohibition against discrimination or preferential treatment by state and other public entities. Initiative constitutional amendment. Retrieved from http://vigarchive.sos.ca.gov/1996/general/pamphlet/209.htm
20.
CampbellA. L.WongC.CitrinJ. (2006). “Racial threat,” partisan climate, and direct democracy: Contextual effects in three California initiatives. Political Behavior, 28, 129–150.
GambleB. S. (1997). Putting civil rights to a popular vote. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 245–269.
31.
GarcesL. M. (2012). Racial diversity, legitimacy, and the citizenry: The impact of affirmative action bans on graduate school enrollment. Review of Higher Education, 36, 93–132.
32.
GarcesL. M. (2013). Understanding the impact of affirmative action bans in different graduate fields of study. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 251-284.
33.
GarcesL. M. (2014). Aligning diversity, quality, and equity: The implications of legal and public policy developments for promoting racial diversity in graduate studies. American Journal of Education, 120, 457–480.
34.
GarrettK. N.JansaJ. M. (2015). Interest group influence in policy diffusion networks. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 15, 387–417.
35.
GilesM. W.BucknerM. (1993). David Duke and Black threat: An old hypothesis revisited. Journal of Politics, 55, 702–713.
36.
GilesM. W.EvansA. (1986). The power approach to intergroup hostility. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 469–486.
37.
GilesM. W.HertzK. (1994). Racial threat and partisan identification. American Political Science Review, 88, 317–326.
38.
GillJ. (2001). Whose variance is it anyways? Interpreting empirical models with state-level data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 1, 318–338.
39.
GlaserJ. M. (1994). Back to the Black belt: Racial environment and White racial attitudes in the south. Journal of Politics, 56, 21–41.
GrodskyE.KalogridesD. (2008). The declining significance of race in college admissions decisions. American Journal of Education, 115, 1–33.
43.
GrodskyE.KurlaenderM. (2010). The demography of higher education in the wake of affirmative action. In GrodskyE.KurlaenderM. (Eds.), Equal opportunity in higher education: The past and future of California’s Proposition 209 (pp. 33–62). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
44.
GrossN.FosseE. (2012). Why are professors liberal?Theory and Society, 41, 127–168.
45.
GrossbackL. J.Nicholson-CrottyS.PetersonD. A. M. (2004). Ideology and learning in policy diffusion. American Politics Research, 32, 521–545.
46.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
47.
GurinP.DeyE.HurtadoS.GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330–366.
Haider-MarkelD. P.QuerzeA.LindamanK. (2007). Lose, win, or draw? A reexamination of direct democracy and minority rights. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 304–314.
50.
HarrisA. L.TiendaM. (2012). Hispanics in higher education and the Texas top 10% law. Race and Social Problems, 4, 57–67.
51.
HeroR. E.TolbertC. J. (1996). A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the U.S. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 851-871.
52.
HinrichsP. (2012). The effects of affirmative action bans on college enrollment, educational attainment, and the demographic composition of universities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94, 712–722.
53.
Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir. 1996).
54.
HurtadoS.Wathington CadeH. (2001). Time for retreat or renewal? Perspectives on the effects of Hopwood on campus. In HellerD. (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access, and accountability (pp. 100–120). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
JohnsonM. (2001). Testing the impact of social diversity and racial attitudes on social welfare policy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 27–49.
KatznelsonI. (2005). When affirmative action was White: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
58.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1984). Southern politics in state and nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. (Original work published 1949)
59.
KingG.ZengL. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137–163.
KurlaenderM.GrodskyE. (2013). Mismatch and the paternalistic justification for selective college admissions. Sociology of Education, 86, 294–310.
62.
LairdB. (2005). The case for affirmative action in university admissions. Berkeley, CA: Bay Tree.
63.
LewisD. C. (2011). Direct democracy and minority rights: Same-sex marriage bans in the U.S. states. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 364–383.
64.
LiA. Y. (2017). Covet thy neighbor or “reverse policy diffusion”? State adoption of Performance Funding 2.0. Research in Higher Education, 58, 746–771.
65.
LongM. C. (2004). College applications and the effect of affirmative action. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 319–342.
66.
LongM. C.TiendaM. (2008). Winners and losers: Changes in Texas university admissions post-Hopwood. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 255–280.
67.
MaglebyD. B. (1998). Ballot initiatives and intergovernmental relations in the United States. Publius, 28, 147–163.
68.
MakseT.VoldenC. (2011). The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. Journal of Politics, 73, 108–124.
69.
McLendonM. K.HearnJ. C.DeatonR. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1–24.
70.
McLendonM. K.HellerD. E.YoungS. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363–400.
71.
McLendonM. K.MokherC. G.FloresS. M. (2011). Legislative agenda setting for in-state resident tuition policies: Immigration, representation, and educational access. American Journal of Education, 117, 563–602.
72.
MelguizoT. (2010). Are students of color more likely to graduate from college if they attend more selective institutions? Evidence from a cohort of recipients and nonrecipients of the Gates Millennium Scholarship Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 230–248.
MintromM. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738–770.
75.
MintromM.VergariS. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60, 126–148.
76.
MokherC.McLendonM. K. (2009). Uniting secondary and postsecondary education: An event history analysis of state adoption of dual enrollment policies. American Journal of Education, 115, 249–277.
77.
MooneyC. Z.LeeM. H. (1995). Legislative morality in the American states: The case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 599–627.
78.
MooneyC. Z.LeeM. H. (1999). The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 766–780.
79.
MooreR. T.RavishankarN. (2012). Who loses in direct democracy?Social Science Research, 41, 646–656.
80.
MosesM. S.YunJ. T.MarinP. (2009). Affirmative action’s fate: Are 20 more years enough?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(17), 1–34.
81.
MoyP.DomkeD.StammK. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 7–25.
OliverJ. E.MendelbergT. (2000). Reconsidering the environmental determinants of White racial attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 574–589.
84.
OliverJ. E.WongJ. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567–582.
85.
PallaisA.TurnerS. (2006). Opportunities for low-income students at top colleges and universities: Policy initiatives and the distribution of students. National Tax Journal, 59, 357–386.
86.
PercivalG. L. (2009). Testing the impact of racial attitudes and racial diversity on prisoner reentry politics in the U.S. states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 9, 176–203.
87.
PusserB. (2004). Burning down the house: Politics, governance, and affirmative action at the University of California. Albany: State University of New York Press.
88.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).
89.
RochaR.EspinoR. (2009). Racial threat, residential segregation, and the policy attitudes of Anglos. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 415–426.
90.
RochaR. R.MatsubayashiT. (2014). The politics of race and voter ID laws in the states: The return of Jim Crow?Political Research Quarterly, 67, 666–679.
Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, 572 U.S. (2014).
93.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.BoboL. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 155–195.
96.
SmithD. A.TolbertC. J. (2001). The initiative to party: Partisanship and ballot initiatives in California. Party Politics, 7(6), 739–757.
97.
SmithD. A.TolbertC. J. (2007). The instrumental and educative effects of ballot measure: Research on direct democracy in the American states. American Political Science Review, 102, 333–350.
98.
SmithM. A. (2001). The contingent effects of ballot initiatives and candidate races on turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 700–706.
99.
SponslerB. (2010). Coveting more than thy neighbor: Beyond geographically proximate explanations of postsecondary policy diffusion. Higher Education in Review, 7, 81–100.
TaylorM. C. (1998). How White attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: Numbers count. American Sociological Review, 63, 512–535.
TiendaM.LeichtK. T.SullivanT.MalteseM.LloydK. (2003). Closing the gap? Admissions and enrollments at the Texas public flagships before and after affirmative action (Working paper No. 2003-01). Princeton, NJ: Office of Population Research, Princeton University.
104.
TolbertC.HeroR. (2001). Facing diversity: Racial/ethnic context and social policy change. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 571–604.
105.
TolbertC. J.GrummelJ. A. (2003). Revisiting the racial threat hypothesis: White voter support for California’s proposition 209. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3, 183–202.
106.
TolbertC. J.GrummelJ. A.SmithD. A. (2001). The effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout in the American states. American Politics Research, 29, 625–648.
VossD. S. (1996). Beyond racial threat: Failure of an old hypothesis in the new south. Journal of Politics, 58, 1156–1170.
109.
VossD. S.MillerP. (2001). Following the false trail: The hunt for White backlash in Kentucky’s 1996 desegregation vote. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 62–80.
110.
WelchK.PayneA. A. (2010). Racial threat and punitive school discipline. Social Problems, 57, 25–48.
111.
YatesJ.FordingR. (2005). Politics and state punitiveness in Black and White. Journal of Politics, 67, 1099–1121.
112.
ZingherJ. N. (2014). The ideological and electoral determinants of laws targeting undocumented migrants in the U.S. states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14, 90–117.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
