In response to the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages’ initiative and the gap existing in identifying high-leverage teaching practices (HLTPs) in world language teaching, this study investigated and decomposed HLTPs in a video corpus of exemplary world language teachers. Specifically, this study clarified the definitions of some identified HLTPs and proposed one new practice—building connections to other content areas to promote students’ communicative competence. The proposed HLTP was broken down into component micro-practices and instructional moves illustrating the ways in which practices were enacted in particular classroom contexts. This line of research is important because only through making visible and breaking down instructional moves can novice teachers quickly grasp practices and truly learn to enact the teaching practice for themselves.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2015b). Core practices for effective language learning (Webinar Series). Retrieved from https://www.pathlms.com/actfl/courses/2074
4.
Annenberg Learner. (2017). Teaching foreign languages K-12: A library of classroom practices. Retrieved from https://www.learner.org/
5.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2007). 2007Wallace Foundation Distinguished Lecture: What makes education research “educational”?Educational Researcher, 36, 529–540.
6.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511.
7.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach: And connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17–39.
8.
BallD. L.SleepL.BoerstT. A.BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 458–474.
9.
BorgS. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109.
BrintonD.SnowM. A.WescheM. B. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
CohenD. K.RaudenbushS. W.BallD. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119–142.
13.
CreswellJ. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DanielsH.ZemelmanS.HydeA. (2005). Best practice: Today’s standards for teaching and learning in America’s schools (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
DavinK. J.TroyanF. J. (2015). The implementation of high-leverage teaching practices: From the university classroom to the field site. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 124–142.
18.
DonatoR. (2016). Sociocultural theory and content-based foreign language instruction. In CammarataL. (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp. 25–51). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
DutroE.CartunA. (2016). Cut to the core practices: Toward visceral disruptions of binaries in PRACTICE-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 119–128.
20.
FogoB. (2014). Core practices for teaching history: The results of a Delphi panel survey. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 151–196.
21.
ForzaniF. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 1–12.
22.
GlisanE. W.DonatoR. (2017). Enacting the work of language instruction: High leverage teaching practices. Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
23.
GrabeW.StollerF. L. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In SnowM. A.BritonD. (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 5–21). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson PTR.
24.
GrossmanP. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
GrossmanP. (2011). Framework for teaching practice: A brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113, 2836–2843.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 15, 273–289.
28.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2055–2100.
29.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 273–289.
30.
HlasA. C.HlasC. S. (2012). A review of high-leverage teaching practices: Making connections between mathematics and foreign languages. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 76–97.
31.
JohnsonK. E. (2015). Reclaiming the relevance of L2 teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 99, 515–528.
32.
KearneyE. (2015). A high-leverage language teaching practice: Leading an open-ended group discussion. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 100–123.
33.
KennedyM. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 6–17.
34.
KnoblauchH.TumaR.SchnettlerB. (2013). Video analysis and videography. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 435–449). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
KubanyiovaM.FeryokA. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. Modern Language Journal, 99, 435–449.
36.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 21–34.
37.
LampertM.FrankeM. L.KazemiE.GhousseiniH.TurrouA. C.BeasleyH.CroweK. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226–243.
38.
LampertM.GrazianiF. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 491–509.
39.
LewisJ. M. (2007). Teaching as invisible work (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
40.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 378–386.
41.
OlesonA.HoraM. T. (2014). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in shaping faculty teaching practices. Higher Education, 68, 29–45.
42.
PufahlI.RhodesN. C.ChristianD. (2001). What we can learn from foreign language teaching in other countries (Center for Applied Linguistics report). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED456671.pdf
43.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
44.
StoneR. (2007). Best practices for teaching mathematics: What award-winning classroom teachers do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
TroyanF., J.DavinK. J.DonatoR. (2013). Exploring a practice-based approach to foreign language teacher preparation: Work in progress. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 154–180.
47.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.
