Middle schools are important because they launch students on trajectories that they are likely to follow throughout their formal educations. This study explored the relationship of first-generation segregation (elementary and middle school racial composition) and second-generation segregation (racially correlated academic tracks) to reading and mathematics test scores of Grade 8 students who attended the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) in 1997. At the time the data were collected, the district had been operating under a mandatory desegregation plan since the early 1970s, which it continued to do for another five years. While the majority of students attended desegregated schools for most of their CMS education, a portion of youth also experienced school- and classroom-level segregation. Survey data collected from 1,812 students in randomly selected language arts classes stratified by track from the district’s 24 middle schools were analyzed with multilevel modeling to examine the influence of school and classroom racial composition on standardized scores, controlling for student and family factors associated with school performance. Results indicate that school- and classroom-level racial segregation was negatively related to achievement. Beginning in elementary school, sequential experiences of first- and second-generation segregation likely triggered a cycle of cumulative disadvantage for respondents’ middle school educational outcomes. This article contributes to the literatures on the structural antecedents of school success and failure, the ways that many positive desegregation effects are undermined by tracking, and how first- and second-generation segregation contributes to maintaining the race gap in school outcomes.
AndersonE. (2013). The imperative of integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
ArmorD. (1995). Forced justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
ArmorD. (1998, December30). Evaluation of unitary status in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Expert report to the court. U.S. District Court for Western District of North Carolina.
4.
ArmorD.RossellC.WahlbergH. (2002). The outlook for school desegregation. In RossellC.ArmorD.WahlbergH. (Eds.), Desegregation in the 21st century (pp. 321–334). Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
BerendsM.PeñalosaR. (2010). Increasing racial isolation and test score gaps in mathematics: A 30-year perspective. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 978–1007.
6.
BillingsS. B.DemingD. J.RockoffJ. (2013). School segregation, educational attainment and crime. Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 435–476.
7.
BormanG.DowlingM. (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s Equality of Educational Opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1201–1246.
8.
BormanK. M.EitleT. M.MichaelD.EliteD.LeeR.JohnsonL.. . . ShircliffeB. (2004). Accountability in a postdegregation era: The continuing significance of racial segregation in Florida’s schools. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 605–631.
9.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BraddockJ. H. (1990). Tracking in the middle grades: National patterns of grouping for instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(6), 445–449.
11.
BraddockJ. H.EitleT. M. (2004). School desegregation: Research, policy, practice, and future directions. In BanksJ. A.McGeeM. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 828–843). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BradleyL.BradleyG. W. (1977). The academic achievement of Black students in desegregated schools: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 47(3), 399–449.
13.
Brown v. Board of Education. 347 U.S. (1954).
14.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century: Preparing American youth for the 21st century: The report of the Task Force on Education of Young Adolescents. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on the Adolescent Development.
15.
CarterP. L. (2005). Keepin’ it real. School success beyond Black and White. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
CenziperD. (2001, December17). New standards hit minorities hard. Charlotte Observer, pp. 1A, 7A.
17.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. (1973). A report to the superintendent on the pupil assignment plan. Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC: Author.
18.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. (1996a). Class counts. Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC: Author.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. (1997). Class counts. Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC: Author.
21.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. (1998). Middle school percent African Americans in language arts, mathematics, and science classes, 1997–1998, Exhibit 1a, 1b, and 1d, Capacchione v. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Board of Education. Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC: Author.
22.
ClotfelterC. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
ColemanJ. S. (1998). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE.HobsonC.McPartlandJ.MoodA.WeinfeldF.YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
CondronD. J. (2009). Social class, school and non-school environments, and Black/White inequalities in children’s learning. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 683–708.
26.
CondronD. J.TopeD.SteidlC.FreemanK. (2013). Racial segregation and the Black/White achievement gap, 1992–2009. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(1), 130–157.
27.
CookT. (1984). School desegregation and Black achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28.
CrainR.MahardR. (1983). The effects of research methodology on desegregation achievement studies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 88(5), 839–854.
29.
DauberS.AlexanderK. L.EntwisleD. R. (1996). Tracking and transitions through the middle grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education, 69(4), 290–307.
30.
D’HondtF.Van HoutteP. L.StevensP. (2015). Do attitudes toward school influence the underachievement of Turkish and Moroccan minority students in Flanders?Comparative Education Review, 59(2), 332–354.
31.
DiMaggioP. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on grades of US high school students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.
32.
DiPreteT.BuchmannC. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
DouglasD. M. (1995). Reading, writing, & race. The desegregation of the Charlotte schools. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
34.
DumaisS. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68.
35.
EdelmanB. (2010). Classroom peer effects, effort, and race (Unpublished dissertation). Department of Economics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
36.
EitleT. M. (2002). Special education or racial segregation: Understanding variation in the representation of African American students in educable mentally handicapped programs. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 575–605.
37.
EpsteinJ. L.MacIverD. (1990). Education in the middle grades: National practices and trends. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
38.
EylerJ.CookV. J.WardL. E. (1983). Resegregation: Segregation within desegregated schools. In RossellC.HawleyW. D. (Eds.), The consequences of school desegregation (pp. 126–210). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
39.
FarkasG. (1996). Human capital or cultural capital?: Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district. New York, NY: Aldine.
40.
FielJ. (2013). Decomposing school resegregation. Social closure, racial imbalance, and racial isolation. American Sociological Review, 78(5), 828–848.
41.
FuligniA.EcclesJ.BarberB. (1995). The long-term effects of seventh grade ability grouping in mathematics. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 58–89.
42.
GamoranA.MareR. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality?American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 1146–1183.
43.
GierschJ. (2012). Standardized distraction. High stakes tests, tracking, and college outcomes in North Carolina (Unpublished dissertation). Public Policy Program, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
44.
HallinanM. T. (1992). The organization of students for instruction in the middle school. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 114–127.
45.
HallinanM. T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.
46.
HallinanM. T. (1998). Diversity effects on student outcomes: Social science evidence. Ohio State Law Journal, 59(3), 733–754.
47.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2009). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 349–383.
48.
HarrisA. (2011). Kids don’t want to fail: Oppositional culture and Black students’ achievement gap. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
HermanM. (2009). The Black-White-other achievement gap. Testing theories of academic performance among multiracial and monoracial adolescents. Sociology of Education, 82(1), 20–46.
50.
HofferT. B. (1992). Middle school ability grouping and student achievement in science and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(3), 205–227.
51.
JacksonC. K. (2009). Student demographics, teacher sorting, and teacher quality: Evidence from the end of desegregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(2), 213–256.
52.
JohnsonR. C. (2012). The grandchildren of Brown: The long legacy of school desegregation. Unpublished manuscript, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley.
53.
JonesJ. D.VanfossenB.EnsmingerM. (1995). Individual and organizational predictors of high school track placement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 287–299.
54.
KellyS. (2007). The contours of tracking in North Carolina. The High School Journal, 90(4), 15–31.
55.
KellyS. (2009). The Black-White gap in mathematics course taking. Sociology of Education, 82(1), 47–69.
56.
KellyS.PriceH. (2011). The correlates of tracking policy. Opportunity hoarding, status competition, or a technical-functional explanation?American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 560–585.
57.
KennedyJ. A. (2007). Concurring opinion. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, U.S. 701.
58.
KornhaberM. L. (1997). Seeking strengths: Equitable identification for gifted education and the theory of multiple intelligences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
59.
KulikC.KulikJ. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 415–428.
60.
LamontM.LareauA. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps, and glissandandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 153–168.
61.
LareauA. (2011). Unequal childhoods. Class, race, and family life (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
LeeV. E.BrykA. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(3), 172–192.
63.
LiebowitzD.PageL. (2014). Does school policy affect housing choices? Evidence from the end of desegregation in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 671–703.
64.
LinnR.WelnerK. (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
65.
LlerasC. (2008). Race, racial concentration, and the dynamics of educational inequality across urban and suburban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 886–912.
66.
LovelessT. (2009). Tracking and detracking: High achievers in Massachusetts middle schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
67.
LucasS. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.
68.
LucasS. R.BerendsM. (2007). Race and track location in U.S. public schools. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 25(3), 169–187.
69.
MeierK. J.StewartJ. J.EnglandR. E. (1989). Race, class, and education: The politics of second generation discrimination. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
70.
MickelsonR. A. (1989). Why does Jane read and write so well? The anomaly of women’s achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(1), 43–67.
71.
MickelsonR. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among Black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63(1), 44–61.
72.
MickelsonR. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and second-generation segregation in Charlotte, North Carolina. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 215–252.
73.
MickelsonR. A. (2008). Twenty-first century social science research on school diversity and educational outcomes. Ohio State Law Journal, 69(6), 1173–1228.
74.
MickelsonR. A.NkomoM. (2012). Integrated schooling, life-course outcomes, and social cohesion in multiethnic democratic societies. Review of Research in Education, 36(1), 197–238.
75.
MickelsonR. A.SmithS. S.NelsonA. H. (2015). Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. School desegregation and resegregation in Charlotte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (1988–1997). Common core of data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
78.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011a). Percentages below basic achievement level in mathematics by grade and race/ethnicity, 2009 (NAEP Data Explorer). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/dataset.aspx
79.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011b). TIMMS data explorer. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/idetimss/
80.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2004). Evolution of the ABCs. Raleigh, NC: Division of Accountability Services.
81.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82.
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (2008). The last shall become first: Rural and small town America leads the way on desegregation. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California, Los Angeles.
83.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
84.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
85.
RiehlC.PallasA.NatrielloG. (1999). Rites and wrongs: Institutional explanations for the student course-scheduling process in urban high schools. American Journal of Education, 107(2), 116–154.
86.
RobertsJ. (2007). Majority opinion. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, U.S. 701.
87.
RumbergerR.PalardyG. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999–2045.
88.
SaatciogluA. (2010). Disentangling school- and student-level effects of desegregation and resegregation in the dropout problem in urban high schools: Evidence from the Cleveland Municipal School District: 1977–1998. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1291–1442.
89.
SaatciogluA.SkrticT. (2012). Categorical manipulation in the reproduction of organizational inequality: The case of disability categorization in schools. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Denver, CO.
90.
SchofieldJ. (2010). International evidence on ability grouping with curriculum differentiation and the achievement gap in secondary schools. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1492–1528.
91.
SlavinR. (1990). Achievement effects of ability groups in secondary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471–499.
92.
SmithS. S. (2004). Boom for whom? Education, desegregation, and development in Charlotte. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
93.
SørensonA. B.HallinanM. T. (1977). A reconceptualization of school effects. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 273–289.
94.
SouthworthS. (2010). Examining the effects of school composition on North Carolina student achievement over time. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(18), 1–45.
95.
SouthworthS.MickelsonR. A. (2007). The interactive effects of race, gender, and high school racial composition on college track placement. Social Forces, 86(2), 497–523.
96.
SpadeJ.ColumbiaL.VanfossenB. (1997). Tracking in mathematics and science: Courses and course selection procedures. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 108–127.
97.
StewartE. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school- and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179–204.
98.
St. JohnN. (1975). School desegregation: Outcomes for children. New York, NY: Wiley.
99.
Swann v. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Schools. 402 U.S. 1, 15 (1971).
100.
ThomasC. (2007). Concurring opinion. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, U.S. 701.
101.
TysonK. (2012). Integration interrupted: Tracking, Black students and acting White afterBrown. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
102.
UseemE. (1992). Middle schools and math groups: Parents involvement in children’s placement. Sociology of Education, 65(4), 263–279.
103.
Van PraagL.D’hondtF.StevensP.Van HoutteM. (2015). Is the sky really the limit? Exploring the attitude-achievement paradox in the Belgian context. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(2), 225–238.
104.
VigdorJ.LudwigJ. (2011). Segregation and the test score gap. In MagnusonK.WaldfogelJ. (Eds.), Steady gains and stalled progress: Inequality and the Black-White test score gap (pp. 181–121). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
105.
WangC. (2005). Impacts of school racial composition on the middle school achievement gap in post unitary CMS. Unpublished manuscript, UNCC College of Education, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
106.
WatanabeM. (2007). Lessons from a teacher inquiry group about tracking: Perceived student choice in course-taking and its implications for detracking reform. Teachers College Record, 109(9), 2135–2170.
107.
WellsA. S.CrainR. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 531–555.
108.
WelnerK. G.OakesJ. (1996). (Li)ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal challenges. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 451–470.
