Recent research has shown that, in a university context, mastery goals are highly valued and that students may endorse these goals either because they believe in their utility (i.e., social utility), in which case mastery goals are positively linked to achievement, or to create a positive image of themselves (i.e., social desirability), in which case mastery goals do not predict academic achievement. The present two experiments induced high versus neutral levels of mastery goals’ social utility and social desirability. Results confirmed that mastery goals predicted performance only when these goals were presented as socially useful but not presented as socially desirable, especially among low achievers, those who need mastery goals the most to succeed.
AbeleA. E.CuddyA. J. C.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065. doi:10.1002/ejsp.574
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
3.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structure, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
5.
AndermanE. M.DannerF. (2008). Achievement goals and academic cheating. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155–180.
6.
BangerterA. (2000). Transformation between scientific and social representations of conception: The method of serial reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 521–535. doi:10.1348/014466600164615
7.
BarronK.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2000). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: A multiple goals approach. In SansoneC.HarackiewiczJ. M. (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 229–254). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
BarronK.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706
9.
BeauvoisJ.-L. (2003). Judgment norms, social utility, and individualism. In DuboisN. (Ed.), A sociocognitive approach to social norms (pp. 123–147). London, UK: Routledge.
10.
BeauvoisJ.-L.DuboisN. (2009). Lay psychology and the social value of persons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1082–1095. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00225.x
11.
BerginD. A. (1995). Effects of a mastery versus competitive motivation situation on learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 63, 303–314. doi:10.1080/00220973.1995.9943466
12.
BiggsJ.KemberD.LeungY. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149. doi:10.1348/000709901158433
13.
BiggsJ.TangC. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at University (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: SRHE and Open University.
14.
ButlerR. (1993). Effects of task- and ego-achievement goals on information seeking during task engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 18–31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.18
15.
CialdiniR. (1990). Influence et manipulation [Influence and manipulation]. Paris, France: First.
16.
CourvoisierN.ClémenceA.GreenE. G. T. (2013). Man-made black holes and Big Bangs: Diffusion and integration of scientific information into everyday thinking. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 287–303. doi:10.1177/0963662511405877.
17.
DarnonC.ButeraF. (2005). Buts d’accomplissement, stratégies d’étude et motivation intrinsèque : Présentation d’un domaine de recherche et validation française de l’échelle d’Elliot et McGregor (2001) [Achievement goals, study strategies, and intrinsic motivation: Presenting a domain of research and the French validation of Elliot & McGregor’s (2001) scale]. L’Année psychologique, 105, 105–131. doi:10.3406/psy.2005.3821
18.
DarnonC.ButeraF.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 61–70. doi:10.1177/0146167207301022
19.
DarnonC.DompnierB.DelmasF.PulfreyC.ButeraF. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 119–134. doi:10.1037/a0012824
20.
DarnonC.DompnierB.GilliéronO.ButeraF. (2010). The interplay of mastery and performance goals in social comparison: A multiple goal perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 212–222. doi:10.1037/a0018161
21.
DarnonC.DompnierB.PoortvlietM. (2012). Achievement goals in educational contexts: A social psychology perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 760–771. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00457.x
22.
DompnierB.DarnonC.ButeraF. (2009). Faking the desire to learn: A clarification of the link between mastery goals and academic achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 939–943. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02384.x
23.
DompnierB.DarnonC.ButeraF. (2013). When performance-approach goals predict academic achievement and when they do not: A social value approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 587–596. doi:10.1111/bjso.12025
24.
DompnierB.DarnonC.DelmasF.ButeraF. (2008). Achievement goals and social judgment: The performance-approach goals paradox. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 247–271.
25.
DompnierB.PansuP.BressouxP. (2006). An integrative model of scholastic judgments: Pupils’ characteristics, class context, halo effect and internal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 119–133. doi:10.1007/BF03173572
26.
DornbuschS. M.GlasgowK. L.LinI. C. (1996). The social structure of schooling. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 401–429. doi:10.1146/annurev .psych.47.1.401
27.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
28.
DweckC. S.LeggetE. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
29.
ElliotA. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In: ElliotA. J.DweckC. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford.
30.
ElliotA. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
31.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.72.1.218
32.
ElliotA. J.FryerJ. W. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In ShahY.GardnerW. L. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 235–250). New York, NY: Guilford.
33.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH.A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628
34.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2*2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
35.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–628. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613
36.
ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156. doi:1040-726X/01/0600-0139$19.50/0
37.
ElliottE. S.DweckC. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
38.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. doi:10.1037/a0026054
39.
GabrieleA. J.MontecinosC. (2001). Collaborating with a skilled peer: The influence of achievement goals and perceptions of partners’ competence on the participation and learning of low-achieving students. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 152–178. doi:10.1080/00220970109600654
40.
GrahamS.GolanS. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187–194. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.187
41.
GrantH.DweckC.S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
42.
GuimondS. (2001). Epistemic authorities in higher education: The relative influence of peers, faculty and courses on attitude formation and change. In ButeraF.MugnyG. (Eds.), Social influence in social reality (pp. 211–223). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
43.
GuimondS.PalmerD. L. (1996). The political socialization of commerce and social science students: Epistemic authority and attitude change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1985–2013. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996 .tb01784.x
44.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.TauerJ. M.CarterS. M.ElliotA. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
45.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.TauerJ. M.ElliotA. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 562–575. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562
46.
HarackiewiczJ. M.DurikA. M.BarronK. E.Linnenbrink-GarciaL.TauerJ. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105–122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
47.
HullemanC. S.DurikA. M.SchweigertS.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An Integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398
48.
HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science .1177067
49.
HullemanC. S.SchragerS. M.BodmannS. M.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/a0018947
50.
HullemanC. S.SenkoC. (2010). Up around the bend: Forecasts for achievement goal theory and research in 2020. In UrdanT. C.KarabenickS. A. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 16A, pp. 71–104). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
51.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgments: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
52.
JuddC. M.McClellandG. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
53.
LichtB. G.DweckC. S. (1984). Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of children’s achievement orientations with skill area. Developmental Psychology, 20, 628–636. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.20.4.628
54.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.TysonD.PatallE. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 19–70.
MeeceJ. L.AndermanE. M.AndermanL. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
57.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
58.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77
59.
NichollsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
60.
PansuP.DompnierB. (2011). A bidimensional scale of scholastic value: Social desirability and social utility, two dimensions of personological judgment. European Review of Applied Psychology, 61, 31–41. doi:10.1016/j.erap .2010.08.001
61.
PekrunR.ElliotA. J.MaierM. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi:10.1037/a0013383
62.
PintrichP.SchunkD. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
63.
PoortvlietM.DarnonC. (2010). Towards a more social understanding of achievement goals: The interpersonal effects of mastery and performance goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 324–328. doi:10.1177/0963721 410383246
64.
RosenbergS.NelsonC.VivekananthanP. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294. doi:10.1037/h0026086
65.
SenkoC.HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. doi:0.1080/00461520.2011.538646
66.
SmedingA.DompnierB.MeierE.DarnonC.BaumbergerB.ButeraF. (2015). The desire to learn as a self-presentation tool among adolescents: Paradoxical effects of mastery goals on learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
67.
ThorndikeE. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29. doi:10.1037/h0071663
68.
UrdanT. (2004). Can achievement goal theory guide school reform? In PintrichP. R.MaehrM. L. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 13, pp. 361–392). Stanford, CA: JAI Press.
69.
UrdanT.MestasM. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 354–365. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.354
70.
UrdanT.SchoenfelderE. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331–349. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003
71.
UrdanT.TurnerJ. C. (2005). Competence motivation in the classroom. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 297–317). New York, NY: Guilford.
72.
UtmanC. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 170–182. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4
73.
VansteenkisteM.SmeetsS.SoenensB.LensW.MatosL.DeciE. L. (2010). Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 333–353. doi:10.1007/s11031-010-9188-3
